That is my only conclusion as well.
2 Likes
11.0 sounds about right as its only got a 15km radar range, at least it won’t have a seeker that only cares for friendlies and scout drones like CVRT Stormer, as for the ADATS it’s so high because people kept using it as a tank destroyer. Will certainly be a one of a kind in the game as the only missile launching SPAA similar to it in-game would be the improved Chaparral
I find the Stormer a more effective Anti-Tank vehicle :D
1 Like
lol Unprecedented.
Why are you comparing Rapier to Imp Chap?
its very good as wrecking IFVs but I mostly use it to scare away helis and ruin SU25 players bombing runs
1 Like
I see.
1 Like
The problem is Israel just made a giant leap in SAM systems, from the Machbets and Chaparral, to Barak 8 missiles and then to the Iron dome. Patriot is not a viable system to implement in WT, same as the iron dome, and the SPYDER is not even used by the IDF. Even tho i would love the SPYDER to be in the game i also agree its too powerful.
We could get the MIM-23 Hawk carriers, but its still not a viable long range high manouverablity missile.
XD comparing M163 to a Gepard? wtf is wrong with you?
1 Like
Straight from Gaijin: “All-in-all, the ZSU-23-4M2 should be a good alternative to the already familiar rank VI Shilkas in the game just at a lower rank.”
Don’t ask me, I’m just responding to Alvis.
1 Like
Rank =/= BR; thanks for proving your previous posts wrong.
Rank 5 BRs BTW:
You’re the only one with any posts comparing them.
I ignored that cause I was giving you the courtesy of you likely made a mistake including it.
For anyone suggesting the US doesn’t have options for its SPAA gaps…
5.3-5.7: M114A2. 20mm Hispano-Suiza autocannon, similar to SUB-I-II and AMX-10P.
8.3: General Dynamics XM246. 2x 35mm cannons, same as Gepard/Type87SPAAG/Itspv but on an M48 chassis.
9.3-9.7: AN/TWQ-1 Avenger. 4-8x Stingers and an FN M3P .50cal on a Humvee chassis.
7 Likes
Great list
3 Likes
@iMatty01
I see you came to defend Soviets again.
Rank V goes to BR 8.0 minimum.
8.0 =/= 7.3.
ZSU-37-2 is rank V.
All the Russian main arguments being shot down by me.
Are you trying to say it won’t be rank V, or am I misunderstanding you?
It will be a Rank V SPAA, most likely at 7.0-7.7.
The likely BR for it is 7.7.
People claiming 7.0 cause that’s the lowest BR at rank 5 is a trash take when rank V goes into 8.0 as the minimum maximum.
They have to be Russian mains begging for an OP SPAA.
People are just guessing what BR it will be at, accusing others of being RU mains because of their prediction is confusing, and shouldn’t be done.
Clearly they have a reason to think that it would be 7.0-7.3, but you need to disprove that instead of claiming they are biased towards Russia.
bro tried to sneak Germany FlaRakRad as viable 💀 (yes it is, but compared to other nations spaas is a joke, FlaRakRad just have 2 missiles and the range is the same as all Nato spaas, ITS OK, Its not an OP Beast like Pantsir with x6 missiles + Cannons)
idk why you are putting Germany in the same bag as Russia like if Germany Spaa was OP or something, Russia is the only nation with the most OP Spaa with better range missiles and all that shi.
i do agree OSA will be kinda weird because i doubt the OSA its gonna be better than the FlaRakRad so it will just be there on the tree. Interesting addition if you ask me, doesnt bother anyone.
we need the better version of FlaRakRad
1 Like
One of the reasons can be because the nations did not have any SPAA to be added. That is becaus eof teh reason of doctrine and the incoperation of the nations airforce as part of anti network.
In case of america they are so delussional thinking that they will always have airsupiority and they dont need to SPAA to begin with. So the US army did not invest in any SPAA and did not buy any. Delvop and reasarch , yes, buy and use no. So for US players at least one or wtwo players always have to spawn in a jet and be always on CAP. All other nations are stuck with guys sitting in spawn area watching a green screeen and wait for dots to show up.
1 Like