Watch out, he might call you a commie
2 Likes
Congrats on almost understanding the point I was making
Bit pathetic then isn’t it?
1 Like
Its not bad cuz u do 1 shot everything
U have decent mobility
I put exepert crew on that and i was having fun
It has no business being at the same BR as Tiger II (H).
Not mentioning the mobility unmanned turret ? Also this guy is just throwing random insult , why are US le weak russia le best people always like this. Peak funny
1 Like
Why not? It can pen the turret easily and it can op the entire crew
Sure tiger 2 is bit better bcuz the hull armor but it cant op tanks and bave worse reverse
Pros and cons
IS-2’s pros:
- more HE filler
- slightly more angled pen
- 3km/h better reverse speed
- 1.3 HP/t more
- 12.7mm MG
cons:
- much longer reload
- worse gun handling
- much worse gun depression
- 5km/h worse top speed
- worse armor
- worse optics
- less/worse smokes
- giant cupola
- worse ammo compartmentalization
- no neutral steering
I think it’s pretty obvious who’s a lot better.
2 Likes
-Worse gun handling
-Worse reload
-Worse armor
-Worse shell
All of that in exchange for a mediocre upside of being able to pen the turret face of the tiger 2. Which if you didn’t know , you could just angle your turret
1 Like
Typhoon does even better with fullreal and is more responsive with them then su27sm , and while having superior closerange missles going 1-4 is vile
Totally…Its only 0.3 BR better than a Bradley or Desert Warrior. Sadly Russian players abused the BMP 2M for so long they think their IFVS/Light tanks are at a fair br.
1 Like
I think the real question you need to start asking is not how much the darts can go through, but also HOW much better is ERA getting and do you believe it.
You need to be convinced that a dart can pen, but inherently believe the plates to be an honest assessment of their capability. You only question the one.
I still find era to be incredibly low tech, it’s the most economic answer to tank armor and seemingly not the most effective.
How much better can you make flying plates hitting a dart to destroy or degrade it and how large do you think these generational leaps are. Armor is much easier to defeat, and is normally always playing catchup.
As new as one could call a new apfds. We’re still just putting fins on a long rod with a tip.
It’s probably material sciences more than anything else, but we’ll never know.
Welllllll, a big scenario is peaking and I can use the heatfs round to sometimes blow up the styler based off where it hits and how the turret sits. If memory serves, the round would be much more likely to glance the top of the turret and what is there I think may still have the CE protection to stop it, but don’t quote me on this part.
I think this whole discussion is a bit silly to watch, but if you’re behind a hill. I’d probably rather be Japan for defense and Stryker for offense. From what I remember playing as one and against the other.
How is a 9m superior at close range esp a dogfight bro get serious
1 Like
It sure is but I know you’re doing your very best
Hey man , if you want an English tutor I can hire one for you
1 Like
NERA and ERA have their own pros and cons.
NERA:
More expensive
Bulkier
Typically can only sustain 1-2 hits
Safer for nearby troops
Typically better against APFSDS
FAR heavier
ERA:
Cheaper
Smaller (typically)
Better against HEAT-FS
Easily replaceable
Lighter
Dangerous for troops within 5 meters
Both have room to improve
For awhile composite was ahead of the game.
But ERA’s explosion, and metal plates degrade the incoming round, not just the plates
Nera’s pros can basically be summed up as mostly better, and safer but heavier and more costly.
Era is cheap and works lol
But I agree.
I still don’t think it’s as good as what’s reported and time will tell. I think darts do much more damage than newer era protection wants to admit as possible.
Like I said, how much more advanced can we get slinging plates upward. I don’t think these generational leaps are that large because of how far they’ve come already.
That’s just my own opinion though.
1 Like