Trying to argue the difference between a manned and unmanned turret is stupid, the type 16 is more visible in 90% of scenarios than a striker is, especially when hull down or peeking a ridgeline due to it having a low profile turret, and the reason they perform poorly is due to the players not the striker itself
4 Likes
About time, maybe take a break from wt, i don’t think the game or it’s community suite you
1 Like
Watch out or I might say water is safe to drink, what will you drink then?
I never said that you were wrong by saying it is taller. I just explained why I initially disagreed.
Sorry for misinterpreting you.
Look in the mirror.
Do you really have to be this hostile and insufferable?? Who hurt you??
5 Likes
“If I told you to jump off a cliff, would you?” type question 😂
Seriously though you have plagued this thread for far too long so feel free to take a break simply because i liked his comment, making us a part of an anti ‘ExcaliburSniper’ hive mind
3 Likes
Watch out, he might call you a commie
2 Likes
Congrats on almost understanding the point I was making
Bit pathetic then isn’t it?
1 Like
Its not bad cuz u do 1 shot everything
U have decent mobility
I put exepert crew on that and i was having fun
It has no business being at the same BR as Tiger II (H).
Not mentioning the mobility unmanned turret ? Also this guy is just throwing random insult , why are US le weak russia le best people always like this. Peak funny
1 Like
Why not? It can pen the turret easily and it can op the entire crew
Sure tiger 2 is bit better bcuz the hull armor but it cant op tanks and bave worse reverse
Pros and cons
IS-2’s pros:
- more HE filler
- slightly more angled pen
- 3km/h better reverse speed
- 1.3 HP/t more
- 12.7mm MG
cons:
- much longer reload
- worse gun handling
- much worse gun depression
- 5km/h worse top speed
- worse armor
- worse optics
- less/worse smokes
- giant cupola
- worse ammo compartmentalization
- no neutral steering
I think it’s pretty obvious who’s a lot better.
2 Likes
-Worse gun handling
-Worse reload
-Worse armor
-Worse shell
All of that in exchange for a mediocre upside of being able to pen the turret face of the tiger 2. Which if you didn’t know , you could just angle your turret
1 Like
Typhoon does even better with fullreal and is more responsive with them then su27sm , and while having superior closerange missles going 1-4 is vile
Totally…Its only 0.3 BR better than a Bradley or Desert Warrior. Sadly Russian players abused the BMP 2M for so long they think their IFVS/Light tanks are at a fair br.
1 Like
I think the real question you need to start asking is not how much the darts can go through, but also HOW much better is ERA getting and do you believe it.
You need to be convinced that a dart can pen, but inherently believe the plates to be an honest assessment of their capability. You only question the one.
I still find era to be incredibly low tech, it’s the most economic answer to tank armor and seemingly not the most effective.
How much better can you make flying plates hitting a dart to destroy or degrade it and how large do you think these generational leaps are. Armor is much easier to defeat, and is normally always playing catchup.
As new as one could call a new apfds. We’re still just putting fins on a long rod with a tip.
It’s probably material sciences more than anything else, but we’ll never know.
Welllllll, a big scenario is peaking and I can use the heatfs round to sometimes blow up the styler based off where it hits and how the turret sits. If memory serves, the round would be much more likely to glance the top of the turret and what is there I think may still have the CE protection to stop it, but don’t quote me on this part.
I think this whole discussion is a bit silly to watch, but if you’re behind a hill. I’d probably rather be Japan for defense and Stryker for offense. From what I remember playing as one and against the other.
How is a 9m superior at close range esp a dogfight bro get serious
1 Like