Well with the advent of not being able to reload period, with auto loaders being super easy to break now, I don’t think it’s quite fair.
Those game screenshots don’t mean the tank is bigger in game!
Just look at these Wikipedia numbers!!
This is it… The cope singularity
edit : ru mains found this offensive lol
3 Likes
Wait wait wait, I can mess with the suspension on the Stryker? I didn’t know that(don’t play US anymore), and is an acceptable work around if so.
Still though, I shouldn’t have to, it should be able to aim down as it can in reality.
1 Like
Again, line them up in a custom. You will be surprised.
Better yet, why don’t you bug report this huge issue you found. Show us all how the bug reporting managers reply to that.
2 Likes
Yes you can, they added it a bit ago.
You can bring the nose of the vehicle down so you get a fair bit of gun depression.
2 Likes
With it also acting as armor, it was a net neutral addition and changes my opinion not at all… buut, I see your point since there’s no nato equivalent other than crew change stopping reload.
I think it’s fair to think that Gaijin models the size of vehicles accurately.
They’re not going to be off by 1.5m in length and 26cm in width. If they were, someone would’ve noticed it already, and it would have been fixed.
4 Likes
Good to know, already got them key binds stuck from Japan so I’m good. This didn’t use to be a thing as per the last time I played US and used strykers. So thanks for that tidbit.
2 Likes
Yeah I wish it was a thing when I played M1128, it would help loads.
1 Like
They physically can just fine, only 3BM60 has this, theres nothing wrong shootinf 3BM60 and 3BM46 then cycle repeats.
Except game doesnt really model it so 6 seconds.
No, currently 7.1 and 6.5 sec reloads of T-64/80 are just made up reloads Gaijin did.
1 Like
So what’s your point, don’t trust your lying eyes? The GIF is AI?
It’s clearly bigger in game. I don’t believe for a second it would look different in a battle, sounds like pure cope.
Please I don’t know how much more I can laugh at you guys
Please do inform us how your eyeballs are a more credible source than every other available source on on the internet (I used Wikipedia because it lays it out in a format that’s quick and concise).
Or better yet, spend your time typing up a bug report on this issue you found.
“Cmon guys it looks like it, im always right and nobody can convince me”
2 Likes
I believe that your gif is taken from a different perspective due to the size difference that the vehicles have. The Type 16s camera will be zoomed out more, and will make it seem smaller than it is.
I don’t get your point here. The Type 16 is larger IRL and in game.
1 Like
Or better yet, spend your time typing up a bug report on this issue you found.
So we went from “the tank is bigger!!” to “that’s just a bug!! it doesn’t count!! you’re still wrong”
The spinelessness is crazy
I’m saying that since you are so confident you found an issue you should take initiative to fix it. Read what I say and don’t misconstrue it.
The Type 16 is bigger, it is you who is coping if you believe it is smaller than the M1128
4 Likes
But Stryker is wheeled.
2 Likes
I see what you’re doing, you’re gonna pretend you were talking about the IRL measurements all along (even though you don’t know for sure what it includes and excludes on either tanks, and accused me of messing with the image somehow)
do you have a source for this because I’m quite sure I’ve seen the thread Don here where it was discussed and the logic used to discuss why it was 6.5 was a thing because those darts couldn’t be stacked together.
If it indeed the case that you could put 3bm60 and 46 next to each other, and rotate between the 2 rounds with no issue then I don’t see why we couldn’t lower it… but if you take only 60, it should be that. But if they can make it auto switch between the 2, I’ve got no issue with 6.
I distinctly remember a thread about it this and giajin did it because they don’t model carousel rounds as loading so this is how it was done. If that’s what you mean by they made it up, then sure I agree with you… but seemed like a good compromise since there isn’t a ladder actually working.
I’d be curious to retouch this subject for anyone that’s fuzzy about these details that I know have been said in another thread. So do you have a source on that one at all?
You know you are wrong, doubling down on it makes you someone who argues in bad faith. Insults do not add to your argument. Arguing against objectivity does nothing to make you more credible. Only some edgy dude in his own world who cannot accept reality.
Please, line them up in a custom. If you are so confident than prove all of us wrong.
1 Like
If they buffed the auto loader health some, and make it so based on the level of damage, it slows down, that would be nice.
But yes the 26~ sec repair time for the auto loader, THEN having to reload… is just pure cancer.
If they did what I mentioned previously, and then fixed the reload speed. I feel like it would be a very well balanced tank