Serious Balance Issues with Russian Vehicles in War Thunder

Shouldn’t this be 6.5 because the carousel can’t have 2 darts next to each other and is staged as being 6.5 seconds to accommodate for the space in shell by not being able to physically fit 2 darts next to each other?

I’m okay with dropping all t series from 7.1 down to 6.5, but with no long term effect that can reduce reload, I think 6.5 is fine. Every manually loaded tank goes much higher above that number when the loader is lost.

I don’t really think a manually loaded tank, even those OP Leo’s should fall back to like 8-9 seconds when they lose a crew, but you go down to 6.0 for example if the buffs you want are given, but there’s no way to ever reduce this speed and impact the load speed.

“Hmm yes it looks the same size to me so it must be the same size”

Angle, perspective, zoom. Tons of factors. Why don’t you line them up in a custom and come back to me with your findings.

M1128 should be slightly higher but both are huge in comparison to other lights.
In hull down spots M1128 is much harder to spot due to it’s smaller turret.

I didn’t touch the camera between the previews :) It moved a little on its own but not significantly.
Stryker has a massive silhouette in comparison to the 16, though maybe that thin MG mount is taller on the 16, it’s not significant
Things are so simple when you’re not biased, give it a shot

I still think it should get its correct depression angles.

Ah yes, looking at objective facts is bias, makes so much sense now.

Wait a minute though… you’re saying something contradictory to literal facts and using evidence that is subjective only to fit your narrative… what’s that called again? Oh yeah! Confirmation bias.

If you preview the F-16 and Su-27 they appear to be the same size, although that is not the case. Unless of course you say they are based on your own evidence you made up, then I’m just being biased.

3 Likes

You’re saying something contradictory to literal facts and using evidence that is subjective

“Don’t trust your lying eyes” said the russian main
Cope and GIF

If you preview the F-16 and Su-27 they appear to be the same size

oh no no no no ayaaa

I have 0 Russian vehicles other than the reserve ones lmao

You are openly and flagrantly lying because you know you can get away with it by spewing insults when you’re in a corner. If you believe the Type 16 is smaller than the M1128 that’s fine, just don’t go lying about it. The rest of us will take the 5 seconds to prove you’re wrong.

1 Like

I guess it’s not that big of an issue with adaptive suspension.

ezgif-5-8ef1b34971

Same process for this gif
Just rename this thread to commies taking massive Ls

1 Like

F-16 and Su-27 are not the same size tf u mean

1 Like

He’s trying to say that I’m using forced perspective to compare Stryker and Type 16 when it’s just Preview A, then preview B without moving the camera at all.
Absolutely desperate
Watch him say this is AI or photoshopped

Reread what I said very closely

Keyword there is appear.

1 Like

image

First page of Google

They should just rename this thread to people being incapable of typing something into a seachbox

1 Like

Well with the advent of not being able to reload period, with auto loaders being super easy to break now, I don’t think it’s quite fair.

Those game screenshots don’t mean the tank is bigger in game!
Just look at these Wikipedia numbers!!

IRzx

This is it… The cope singularity

edit : ru mains found this offensive lol

2 Likes

Wait wait wait, I can mess with the suspension on the Stryker? I didn’t know that(don’t play US anymore), and is an acceptable work around if so.

Still though, I shouldn’t have to, it should be able to aim down as it can in reality.

1 Like

Again, line them up in a custom. You will be surprised.

Better yet, why don’t you bug report this huge issue you found. Show us all how the bug reporting managers reply to that.

2 Likes

Yes you can, they added it a bit ago.
You can bring the nose of the vehicle down so you get a fair bit of gun depression.

2 Likes

With it also acting as armor, it was a net neutral addition and changes my opinion not at all… buut, I see your point since there’s no nato equivalent other than crew change stopping reload.