I mean we can go into a game right now and test it out , su27sm just completely dies due to a lack of instantaneous turn rate , and r73s cannot compensate for that at all
1 Like
This bit here
control surfaces are being actuated accordingly when in the correct plane.
“Bang bang Actuators” can only be in one of two states, and so at some point must by definition transition between them all to way to full deflection.
Combined with an Open loop system that obviously does not take into account the rate of rotation (open systems do not incorporate feedback) only the true position.
They are effectively Always pointing in a constructive (to varying degrees over the rotation) but non-optimal direction, which averages out over a roll cycle to be correct. Thus why the Pull is averaged. As seen with “Figure 9.” from the prior excerpt(s).
The use of both Proportional Actuation and a Closed loop Schema (takes a number of things into account) allows for the Deflection of the Guidance fins to respond in sync with the rate of rotation, and relative position though a cycle to maximize the produced net force in the commanded direction. As evident with “Figure 6c & -6d.”
My only games are in the BVM from the time 27K was their best CAS IIRC. I’m grinding tech trees, I don’t really care what happens at RU 12.7 as I’m not even using their selling point, KH-38 slingers.
Keyword is most, pay attention.
My point of Stingers being fine against planes at their BR still stands though.
1 Like
I mean I don’t know what kind of projection it is when USA reload rate is like 1 sec faster then all other loaders for no reason (not USA biased btw ) and the abrams turret cheeks and unpennable, also please give me a source for the era or aa overperforming please , I would be happy to read that
1 Like
But but Russian bias
3 Likes
Sure, add me and let’s do a few, i’ll take the SM (i don’t have typhoon)
Ope, looks like you don’t either…
What I wrote didn’t mean that the deflection was perfectly proportional all the time but thanks for clarifying
Human loaders could reload even faster than 5.0, and 5.0 is only possible with ace top level crew (which beginner players tend not to have on their click bait). 5.3 with expert, and the slightest crew damage takes that up to well over 7 seconds (higher than T90M)
Either way rate of fire is not the meta. Bouncing rounds is, it gives you a massive opportunity to kill or at least pen the enemy tank, which on an Abrams means gimped or frozen reload.
T80s are far more likely to bounce rounds especially from beginner players than the other way around, they’re therefore far superior.
- ROF didn’t make the Abrams perform any better
- Armor buff made Leopards into such a menace that the devs hardcoded the MM to pair GER with RU
Flyer plate ERA overperforms in at least one way, and that’s the fact that its effectiveness doesn’t decrease as the angle of impact approaches 90 degrees.
2S38 is op? You never played it before?
2 Likes
I rly dont need to play it
If it was just me u maybe be correct but there is so many ppl that think like me and just look at that
auto canon with 250 pen that have good thermals and lws oh and dont forget the annoying proxy rounds
Why its 10.3, when hstvl is much higher?
The first abrams is 10.7 and it top round is no more then 300 pen if im correct and its an mbt!
2s38 is broken skilless clasic russian bias at its finest
You have not reached 10.0. How can you know either of those vehicle are unbalanced ? Tell me , how can a person who have not played that BR , have not played or even owned those vehicle can talk about vehicle balancing
1 Like
Yeah cause they can’t kill an big boxy IFV that barely have any armor. Have you considered aim better and stop sucking ? Maybe watch the map ? The flank to avoid getting flanked ?
1 Like
Ofc it has no armor its a light tank wtf is this dumb argument?
2s38 is better at everything then even 11.X light tanks exept maybe in mobility so why its 10.3?
U probably think that the chines missile carrier with 1200 pen at 9.7 is balance right?
Cuz it has no armor
And its not big at all+wallet warriors bush this think like its a christmas tree
That a skill issue , even if the thing is bushed you can easily kill the thing ? It doesn’t require weakspot pen to be killed , why the cry about bushes ? Bro now blaming P2W , as if the thing is a small IFV
1 Like
Let’s actually turn this into a list of Russian vehicles that need a BR change, because while I agree the 2s38 is a bit much for 10.x, at the same time things like the T-72B are underwhelming and should move down, I’m fine with the BMP-3 moving a step down and being “replaced” with another BMD-4 in a later update too, also, I’d switch the Tunguska and Strela around as well.
The problem isnt to kill the thing when i see it
The problem is that it has the best fire power in this br with good thermals (gen3) mobility and lwr and its aa as well.
It can spot u way more easily and dont forget it has unmanned turret so its even stronger in a hull down position.
Fox has no armor too so why it was so op when it was added?
God its like im talking to a level 20 wallet warrior
I bet u has the 2s38 and u just dont want it to go up in br
I dont agree tanguska can even go up in br its better then the tor
Also i think t72b is fine where it is
This doesn’t make sense, fox have way better profile compare to the 2S38. It is strong at 10.3 but in no world it is OP. Hull down is not much of a problem if you just , you know , hit the thing ? It mobility is mid at best , the problem is still it size and it gun handling. And the AA ability is barely matter in ground , when you can strafe it ? It is the amount of skillless take that make the 2S38 an unstoppable beast , not the vehicle itself is broken. Also letting a big boxy IFV spotting you first then that either on you or your team letting the flank open. And any IFV could have done the same anyway, it is not a special case for the 2S38, that is a no brainer take. 2S38 could go up but listing those problem and act like 2S38 is the only one having all these is just peak skill issue moment.
Hard disagree on the Tunguska, post-missile physics rework it’s never been good at really anything other than anti-heli stuff.
T-72b suffers from no reverse gear, no thermals, and having a weak armor profile. Granted everything is more or less one shottable around the 10.x area.
1 Like
So far, my experience with China is limited to this lineup;
But even now I can tell China is, and will be, my favourite Ground nation in Top Tier (talking exclusively about ground vehicles, no clue about C*S or helis).
As far as I can tell from Al-Khalid I, and assuming ZTZ/WZ/VT-4 offer a similar experience, China is literally, simply put, a better Russia.
Can you imagine Russian tanks, but with NATO-like reverse speeds, neutral steering and generally better mobility overall? That’s what Chinese tanks are.
Sure, bit worse gun handling and side armor, but the significantly better mobility makes up for it in my opinion.
And just wait till all the Chinese tanks get their missing spall liners once and for all. I can’t fathom how Gaijin still hasn’t added them with the extremely detailed and comprehensive bug reports proving their entire interiors should be coated in these.
I literally can’t wait to get ZTZ-99A- but I will, because I want to grind the tree properly. First, I will get TOR-M1, or even just PGZ04A at least (currently researching). Then, I may either continue the ZTZ line (currently on ZZTZ96A) or advance more on the VT-4 line, which I left at M41D. I don’t know which tank line I will go first for, but I know for sure, I need a functional SPAA first.
Apparently, TOR-M1 was meh at 12.0; but, now that it’s 11.0, it fits my 11.0 grinding lineup quite well, and I imagine it will be much better down here at 11.0 than it was at the same BR as Pantsir.
2 Likes
You haven’t played the HSTV-L either.
I’ve played both, and the HSTV-L is wayyy better. 2S38 is a troll vehicle so people mald when they get killed by it.
2 Likes