Oh, have we reached the end of arguments and now look at K/D ratios?
Maybe my K/D ratio is so bad because I play it aggressively or I’m just a bad player?
Who knows?
That doesn’t change that Russia has ATGMs that you can fire on the move, I think even the AFT has to stop and had it’s turret rotation nerfed ss well.
I’'m currently playing the event with the russian 6.7 lineup, because it is quite honestly, disgustingly good.
And btw, the Turms-T still sits at 10.3, even though it has better protection, better TVD and better reload than the Leopard or the Ariete at 10.7…
And last but not least, the 10.3 lineup of Russia in general is exceptionally good and it seems to have missed any attempts of BR increaes for the TURMS, the SU-25 and the 2S38 while it’s counterparts in other TTs did go up.
Whether that’s russian bias on Gaijin side or simply hand holding that is required to keep the premium russian players happy is a different discussion.
Anyways, the fact is that russian vehicles in the higher BRs are undertiered and the teams still fall apart easily unless they get bolstered by smaller nations where the player base is significantly more experienced.
AFT09 is fine, and still one of the best vehicles in the game. Still nukes everything with ease, apart from the couple of tanks with APS. I have a BMD4, but I’d rather use AFT09 any day. Please don’t bring up the Turms because I looked at how you’ve done in that, also. The supposed bias isn’t helping people in the Turms, I guess it’s just the players and how they play, right? Not that other nations have competitive vehicles, also? Anyway, I don’t suspect we’ll see eye to eye much, because you’ve wasted over 1000 battles in a ZTZ96A premium, in a nation tree that is rich full of good vehicles at all BRs. If you need some home work, just take a look at what vehicles that Soviet 10.3 has to face before going on about bias - especially some of those German vehicles sitting around that BR.
Oh and btw, the BMD-4/M at 9.3 with a fast firing APDS belt, IRST, 2nd Gen Thermals and ATGMS at 9.3 is…very, very questionable.
If you compare that to other TTs, you would have top look at the 10.0 Bradley or the 10.3 BILL just to find something almost as good. Granted, the Bradley and the BILL get APFSDS rounds, but they also lack the sheer mobility of the BMD-4/M.
So if you wanted to level the playing filed and put the BMD-4/M on a fair level ground, you would have to start at minimum 9.7, maybe even 10.0.
But that would of course mean, that it would see uptiers into 10.3 and 10.7 more frequently than the downtiers into 8.3 it currently can see.
And fun fact, I did buy the BMD-4M and run it in a 10.3 lineup and it performs really, really nice. So my view is based on experience.
Do you know that saying: “A picture is worth a thousand words” ?
I don’t even bother shooting ETs at MAW-equipped UFOs in ARB, which is yet another handholding addition that boost their situational awareness basically for free.
Indeed.
Your Pantsir won’t ever hit a decent pilot in the UFO and you’ll be relegated to shooting down his 18 missiles with your 12 SAMs.
And you’re driving Gripen which is clearly an inferior vehicle to the UFOs. Their job is that much easier as they can actually detect Pantsir’s radar and have MAWs.
You forget something important here, it’s called “personal preference”.
I prefer more modern vehicles, with agility, good optics and a more modern battlefield.
The ZTZ96A(P) is a fantastic vehicle and helps farm SL and RP, but I also played the QN506, which is excellent for killing helicopters.
The rest of the Chinese TT is…including Rank 4, russian and american vehicles. Excellent vehicles by itself, but already present in the American and Russian TT, so nothing really unique at the time I was grinding it out.
The rest after that is rather frustrating to play, especially when the tanks barely reverse…
Anyways, as I mentioned, it’s personal preference and the ZTZ96(P), WMA301, QN506 and PGZ04a make an excellent lineup for grinding most of the Chinese TT.
Come on bro, but you’re saying that USSR tanks are under-BR’d, despite many of them not even being able to reverse. I do agree about QN506, I get slapped in it, but it’s fun taking out any helicopters that appear.
I, as in me personally, don’t like the lack of reverse speed.
That doesn’t mean they are bad, that is simply a feature I like and value that the russian tanks don’t have.
But then again, I did serve on a Leopard tank and therefore prefer mobility over protection :)
I don’t know i mean i saw people with many sources say Eurofighter actually can do that plus right now CAPTOR M on it still kinda underperform and the most Gen4.5 have MAW not just Eurofighter try to get gen4.5 it not gonna be easy.
Unlikely there only two possible that you can see such mad man that gonna shoot 18brimstone at one pantsir
1.The people who really hate Pantsir
2. Me
I doubt they’ll transition from pulling 15G to -8G and then back to 15G in a matter of seconds in real life.
I think the devs said they’re working on CRAPTOR-M so the fix is bound to come soon.
Don’t get me wrong, Rafale is very strong, but I think EFT is the stronger one.
By doing that you’re getting rid of the nuisance, so that you can farm free kills on Su-34s.
I think most people moaning about Pantsir actually spawn in a premium Tornado or something like that.
Makes sense - can only imagine all that anti-Russian propaganda being fed into you about how rubbish the Russian gear is and so on, and how wonderful the Nato gear is. This whole conversation chain started because you stated, and I quote:
But the simple fact is, you won’t be able to produce a list of USSR/Russian under-BR’d vehicles without recognising that the other trees have equally strong and even stronger vehicles available to them at each of those higher BR ratings. My looking at your profile was never to stat shame you at all, I’m not out to shame anyone or judge anyone just from that, but I expected your claim to be backed up with vehicle performances that would demonstrate that there may be balance issues to be seen, which I didn’t. And any notion that Russian players just need to ‘git gud’ to take advantage of their gear is quite laughable when each nation has their fair share of good, average, bad and terrible players. Each nation has their fair share of players who play aggressively, defensively, with care or without care. Especially the major nations. This whole topic is just a Russian-bias whine, without much evidence of substance.
