Sepv3

Challenger 2 is 1998. That is literally the tank we have at 11.7.

Challenger 2E is 2002 (1 of our 2 “12.0” tanks)

2F is 2004.

TES/OES (if they are even worth touching) is 2014/2016

BN is a 2018 Tech Demo

All versions of the Challenger 2 use the same everything at its core. Just with different things slapped onto the side. None of the ERA provides additional protection, the only upgrade of note is the engine from the 2002 2E or APS from the 2018 BN. Beyond those 2 points. Its a 1998 tank.

If the M1A2 Sep V2 which is a 2008 tank is just an upgraded version of the M1A2, then the Leopard 2A7V is just an upgraded version of the Leopard 2A5.

Comparing M1A2 (1993) with Leopard 2A7V (2021?) and claiming “US Mains suffer” is just hilarious.

What next? US needs M829A4 vs DM53 whilst deniyng DM73/DM83 from respective tanks?

But even the M1A2 (that is somehow at 11.7 not 12.0) massively outperforms most nations 12.0 tanks, let alone 11.7 tanks.

You guys keep talking about real life service dates completely ignoring that, in SEPv2’s case, NONE of the upgrades from 2008 was implemented.

The improved turret armor (side and front) wasn’t modelled.
The 2003 M829A3 wasn’t implemented.

The “2008” M1A2 SEPv2 is no different from the 1992 M1A2 in War Thunder beyond the thermals and the fact that it’s slower and heavier because you can’t take off the TUSK for some reason.

In War Thunder, functionally, U.S is still stuck in 1992. There is no “2008” tank because there is nothing 2008 about it.

2 Likes

In fairness of this. M829A2 + the Abrams 5 second reload gives it the best firepower in the game bar none. Sure the DM53/L55 combo gets a little more pen, but at the cost of a lower RoF. the A2 is more than enough though to pen any situation.

As it stands, they probably shouldnt have gotten a the 5 second reload buff and should still be on 6 seconds to maintain balance with most nations.

A more powerful shell… Would have been insane.

Of the Abrams still had a 6 second reload… what would it have for it?

What would be the point of it compared to the Leopsrds?

Quicker rate of fire is the ONE saving grace this thing has to sit at the same BR as the 2A7s and 122s.

You have a 2019 tank in your ground forces, don’t go on about in-game issues and inaccuracies because you disregarded those for the Abrams

Better shell, mobility and survivability of a lot of top tier MBTs.

Do we?

BN is 2018. is a tech demo

The CR3TD is also a tech demo that has no armour, no spall liners, no LWS, no ERA, no blowout panels.

It is a 10.0 tank with a top tier shell.

It is straight up weaker than the M1 Abrams at 10.7

Remove the DM53, it would instantly drop to 10.0/10.3

I am waiting for the Challenger 3 to actually be added to give us an equivalent to the M1A2 Sep V2 and Leopard 2A7

Still 2018, and still 2019. SEPv3 is long overdue

Then Sep V2 is still 2008.

Oh no. its 10 years older. Still outperforms it considerably because year isnt used to balance vehicles.

As it stands. Sep V2 and 2A7 belong at 13.0 not 12.0

Ok. So now you changed from using date and Britain suffers to justify US not getting any improvement, to talking about balance.

Still doesn’t change that US should get SEPv3

and if they added the Sep V3?

It would gain what? APS?

Woudlnt get M829A4. I doubt it would even get a better shell than the M829A2.

and US mains would still cry bias and demand buffs. Theyd do that even with the A4 shell

Im sure even with A4, theyd still demand reload buffs over 5 seconds reload

Better armor

Really showing your hate for US here. The Abrams would still undoubtedly have several severe inaccuracies and issues. But it also sounds a whole lot like Britain mains crying bias and demanding buffs for the CR2 despite getting a DM53 equipped tank

recent blog makes me think it's on the way next patch

For China

and it would still be penned by most shells Id imagine and we’d be back to square one, asking for more buffs.

The US is usually universally stronger in all theatres and yet they still cry for buffs.

F-16C getting Aim-9Ms… unneeded.
F-15A getting a BR drop… unneeded
F-15C/E both totally unneeded airframes at the time

Top tier air at the moment is the first time in about 3 years? that the US has been defacto meta and dominant.

And now with tanks. M1A2 is without a doubt, the second strongest tank at top tier right here right now and yet US mains want major buffs for it.

Take the M1A2, and remove everything. Armour, ERA, nerf the engine, etc etc and then increase its reload to 6 seconds.

If you would be happy with that at top tier. Then by my guest. But its no where near equivalent in performance.

CR3TD is the weakest tank at top tier. M1A2 is the second strongest.

1 Like

…survivability?

With a 350mm KE hull that precedes a fighting compartment where hydraulic pump, all crew members, turret basket, turret drives, engine and transmission are all tightly packed and more often than not destroyed in 1 hit, or 2, at most, with a finishing shot after a completely crippling one?

The Abrams may have good mobility and firepower, but they have practically non existent survivability and barely deficient armor.

2 Likes

MiG getting R27ER is A-OK though.

The F-15C was a perfect fit for it’s update. But you’ve said the Typhoon should have come with it so i really don’t think your that trustworthy. The E was only a bit much because it was justifiably demanded for it to get 229 engines after the F-15I got them

I rarely manage to one shot an Abrams, usually they survive the hit and then reverse behind cover to repair.

also, those issues though… apply to everyone else as well. The few times I survive a hit in a CR2? Im just as disabled, though I have never managed to reverse behind cover like Ive seen a few Abrams manage.

but its rare. Really rare. for me to tank a M829A2. Its high pen mean it can pen anywhere with ease

Feels like a few claim its only the US tanks that get disabled if a shell pens.

Bare in mind, the US had the F-14 with Aim-54 long before R-27ER…

It was not. F-16C would have been fine, at most maybe an F-18. F-15 dominated for 6 months uncontested.

That is not my statement. In the lead up to the F-15C MSIP II being added. US Mains told me that the Typhoon would only be added alongside teh F-15C MSIP II and that wasnt in game yet and therefore the Typhoon couldnt be added either…

Then the F-15E

Then the F-18E

Then it would have been the F-22. But thankfully Gaijin realised that was nonsense and added the appropriate F-15 counter

So…

They were wrong, someone telling you something doesn’t make it gospel truth. An F-15C late wouldve been more appropriate, or an F-15SA. The Raptor is still closer than an 80’s MSIP jet

But what else could have been added though. Give me options for Sweden, Germany, Italy, Britain or France that would have actually matched the F-15C performance?

Let alone the F-15E with those upgraded engines.

it was innevetiable