If the SepV3 were to come would we see the M829A4 dart that can pierce ERA with no problem like Relikt ERA or all ERA in general?
ERA perforation is something that is missing from most shells, like the L27A1 and DM53. Its not modeled.
as for the M829A4. Loadout is always a balancing decision.
So maybe, but probably not.
7 Likes
dang would be so cool to see darts doing something other than drivers port or lower plate but here is to wishing
3 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
my aim is completely fine i was curious if we were ever gonna receive a dart that can UFP a Russian/Chinese tank
American MBTs are generally the oldest in the game. The M1A2 Sep V2 will turn 20 years old next year. Meanwhile, the Germans, Soviets, and other tanks are from 2019-2021. And the Gaijins continue to ignore the US top-tier with every update.
3 Likes
You literally have 829a2 which is one of the best top darts currently, I genuinely don’t know what your issue can be except an aiming issue
8 Likes
And the top abrams variants are still the second best mbts after the 2a7s and the strv122s. A new model is not needed.
4 Likes
Are you sure about that?
2 Likes
Why would it come with A4 without all other tech trees getting equivalents?
Also BVM turret is weak, and T-90M’s breach as well as side armor turret and hull is obviously weak.
USA has the best MBTs in the game for a reason.
1 Like
Saying this while Leopard 2A7HU, Leopard 2A7V, Strv 122B+, Strv 122B PLSS, Strv 122A, TKX and Type 10 exist is wild.
9 Likes
TKX fires an inferior round, has inferior armor & gun laying characteristics.
2A7V and Strvs have inferior mobility despite their mobility over-performing according to Swedish trials.
Of course I put 2A5+ slightly above Abrams for having better turret armor, but that’s really it.
The hull armor is mitigated by <500 meter range engagements being commonplace.
1 Like
By an unnoticeable amount- while having more than twice the hull KE and being fully coated in spall liners.
By… 19mm? That won’t be making any difference in Top Tier.
On the other hand, it has a whole full second faster autoloaded reload (not affected by crew status or fired) and it doesn’t have the interior cramped with damageable modules such as FCS, hydraulic pump or a turret basket horizontal traverse that occupies the whole fighting compartment. Not enormous vertical drives or trunnions that act as such.
Worse turret, but better hull- wouldn’t say it’s worse, just differently distributed.
Abrams withstands better shells in the turret, but won’t withstand even 9.7 shells in the hull- while TKX will withstand up to 3BM60 in the hull and turret, but nothing beyond that on either.
This is something no one can, could or will ever agree on. A tank having a 66% frontally pennable surface area vs just 33% is a huge difference, even at close ranges and particularly on the move. Each second, each fraction of a second counts- the time it takes a 66% pennable tank to aim at the 33% tank’s weakspots while the 33% tank needs just to fire in 66%’s general direction to achieve the same or better results.
9 Likes
Am not gonna lie,but TKX gets penned anywhere by anything,sure sometimes it trolls and bounces bad shots,but the Abrams bounces a lot more. M1A2 is probably best top tier tank,with 2A7 coming second. I used to think 2A7 was best,but the armor isnt all and the added mobility and reload speed of Abrams makes it superior.
Relict can protect against M829A4
3 Likes
[Citation needed]
2 Likes
Literally what the manufacturer reports
Do you have a verifiable source that specially designed Anti-(KE)ERA penetrators would fail to pen relikt (something which has proven itself poorly irl) or is this just copium?
“The manufacturer reports” which one? Relikt manufacturer or M829A4 manufacturer? And since manufacturer (not military) reported this, it surely should be allowed to be reposted on forum, yes? Or are you mentioning things that are intended to be kept secret?