Relikt
It’s ineffective on relikt you can’t get around it.
2 Likes
I simply don’t believe those claims, especially after the demonstration of said ERA in a recent testing ground located in eastern europe
1 Like
Relikt is literally made for this. It is literally one of the purposes it was supposed to fulfill
1 Like
So relikt is made to counter shells newer than it, which are designed to kill relikt… explain the logic in that lmao
2 Likes
Sep v3 came out around the same time as T90M
1 Like
I’m talking the rounds, especially DM73 which is very new
If that comes out I think the protections of relikt should be increased. Because relikt in game less protection compared to irl. Then maybe the newer rounds can like decrease 100mm off the relikt
2 Likes
To become even less accurate?
Honestly you’re lucky that Russian tanks get the survivability they do currently
Refer to the document I have provided above. Relikt ERA provides 400 to 500mm protection against kinetic rounds
2 Likes
m829a2 can already front pen k5 t80u
2 Likes
Already got the most powerful round in top tier, DM53 only beats it when fired from the L/55
1 Like
It’s only beaten out by the L/55 DM53
The shorter barreled Leopards have lower penetration by a margin, so yeah it’s the second best top tier round as it stands.
Finally someone who knows the vehicles.
The Abrams are some of the most well rounded and strong vehicles at top tier.
Everyone likes to moan about the turret ring as if other vehicles don’t have huge glaring weaknesses as well.
The get F all in the way of survivability mate.
They have high levels of frontal protection, even which isn’t that reliable considering they’ve got some major weakspots.
- Lower frontal plate
- drivers port
- turret ring is a shot trap.
- breach / top of the turret can also kill crew.
Do not confuse protection with survivability, one is the over all level of armour the latter is the ability to not be taken out by a penetrating round.
As a P.S I also have even up to the BVM and find the russian tanks absolutely damn miserable. I’d much prefer an abrams or even a 2a5/6 over them.
I’m referring to the common negation of post-pen damage
1 Like
so negate basically all armor? bias much…
Not really, since every tank at toptier can do the same thing to the Abrams already, aside from the turret cheeks. But anyway, I would much rather have Sepv3 for its armor upgrades and trophy APS its two years overdue at this point
61kmph is 7 kmph slower than abrams as well as accelerates slower.
The merkava mk4/3 goes 60kmph and is considered slow, challanfer 59 and is considered slow too
Not yet but it also is overall inferior armour wise.
Turret traverse and gun elevation speeds.
Hasn’t survived 3bm42 when I’ve hit it with it.
Nor has it surviced dm43
Good tank but abrams is marginally better.