Sea Harrier, Gr Harriers, AV-8A/AV-8C, and AV-8S discussion about flight performance

Still waiting on the F15QA camo in war thunder for my F15I

Shar > F-15A

1 Like

In effect yes.

It’s responsible for two things, It Slaves the Missile Seeker to the selected Sensor’s (Radar / IRST / HMS / HMD etc.) look angle if a target is being tracked / switchology is correct.

VTAS -1

Otherwise it synthesizes a program to get the seeker to scan in a pattern that effectively increases the FoR of the Sidewinder around the boresight, the pattern used depends on the Airframe & Sidewinder Variant in question.

1 Like

I’m also fairly sure it has an even higher heat signature, because I’ve been able to lock it almost headon using PL-2s.

I think that the treatment of the harriers is unfair, but I highly doubt it is out of malice. Gaijin is too smart to make their premium vehicles (for multiple nations) unusable. Plus, with any buffs the Av-8A/C/S would go to 10.0+ and Gaijin may not like that.

1 Like

Agreed I doubt its out of malice, more incompetence. Bit like HESH

1 Like

Original modeling being bad/full of placeholders. I agree, a lot of it is to do with limitaitons both now or when they were introduced or a lack of information on introduction

But it feels like a total lack of ongoing support for any of them. Things like the Sooty Exhausts, FRS1/FA2 HUD, heat sig issues (even a basic bodge fix using the F-117 code), SRAAMs, etc. I think there is a lot they could do, but just… haven’t. I know there are a LOT of vehicles in War Thunder, but a few feel like they get updates every other week and others its every other year and some of these fixes would probably take them a few minutes as its likely a single line of code that needs changes (like the sooty exhaust)

5 Likes

News from this morning.

Time to climb and VIFF were both rejected. There are videos attached to the reports to prove they are under performing.

1 Like

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

Not just unfair it’s just them bullying it basically lmao.

1 Like

Slightly out of the main topic I guess,
While putting the new F-5A with AIM-9L on 11.0 as an event vehicle.
Keeping SHAR FRS.1 with broken FM on 10.7(Early)/11.0 feels like nothing but pure malice to harrier lovers. I guess.

At this rate, I think I am not gonna make it for spading FRS.1(Early) :|

Of course, I know it can’t be lower due to AIM-9L though…

1 Like

Rejecting stuff that says its performing worse in game then IRL…

good job gaijin

1 Like

They didn’t even give a reason. They just said their tests were close to manual. I employ anyone to try get within a minute of that time lol.

Hint: it’s not possible, gaijin is pulling stuff from their rear end

If I were a famous war thunder YouTube creator I would ask people to make spam reports.

I see so potentially it needs a bigger zone.

Just want to remind everyone that when Gaijin had the “Supersonic” update they really gave the UK a SUBSONIC Jet…

5 Likes

Ah, javelin, one big beauty, which flies slower than F-86A and has a higher BR than it. (was the same, was still meaningless)

I loved that plane ‘before I saw her in WT’

1 Like

The scimitar as well the rudder lock up is a PITA. IK its realistic but how realistic is it based on the pilots notes ect.

By that note every Bf109 should lock up really bad too same with some USSR planes.

yep

Don’t worry I have provided the proof necessary to get that fixed;)

Just noticed Gaijin didn’t even get the basic Harrier physical model correct. The aileron is flush with the flaps in game and that’s not correct.

Air break should auto deploy when gear is down.