Warrior is incorrect, should be 75 km/h.
Oh boy, here I go nerfing again. It better be powered traverse this time.
At least it’s powered.
Also, it’s been reported that Scimitar Mk 2 should have Gen 3 thermals which will give it something over the Warrior. It could also get the APFSDS round, which again, will give it something over Warrior.
1 Like
The Scimitar Mk2 should have a better thermal sight (for the shooter and driver) since the Scimitar Mk2 is from 2012 and the Warrior in the game would be from 1991.
1 Like
I know, gotta tell the tech mods to stop declining those reports. Lol.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/jrK21g0asTED
This is the latest one.
2 Likes
The Warrior in game is from 2003-2005, because it has both BGTI and MILAN.
But yeah the Scimitar 2 should have TVD2 because it has the same sight as Warrior (BGTI).
1 Like
Then it wouldn’t be bad to give Warrior the Milan 3 since according to the dates it would be the one he should have in 2003.
On the other hand, it would be interesting if they added this Warrior as well.
1 Like
The UK didn’t buy MILAN 3. It needs a new firing post to use the EOIRCM feature. By the late 1990s when MILAN 3 was developed, we were already looking to replace MILAN, so had little incentive to upgrade it.
More cost effective to continue using MILAN 2 missiles with UK-built K115 warheads.
MILAN only remained in service as long as it did because TRIGAT was cancelled, and there was a reasonably large inventory of missiles to run down.
2 Likes
It’s not, it’s an upgrade over BGTI and a different upgrade path
Should have the Catherine-MP Third gen sensor
4 Likes
But I imagine they’d at least have the tandem version of Milan 2, right?
Scimitar mk2 uses m-spire which is Catherine MP
1 Like
+1 on that report. Wonder who did it
5 Likes
Don’t worry, I do the same thing when it’s one of mine. Though I’ll bite my tongue when someone shares one of my Scribd links, shouldn’t have used my real name there. It’s linked to my FB.
1 Like
It doesn’t get apfsds, there was a program to make it have apfsds but that program was canceled
Not for now anyway, though the program got to the classification stage of the round getting a L number, so it wasnt so much the program was cancelled as the order was at that point. The rounds existed, were fully tested.
IIRC Smin stated that they will wait and see how the tank does then decide if it needs it.
I am just sad gaijin mods decided Scimitar 2 is the only CVRT that never put spall liners in, apparently.
6 Likes
Somebody who causes right trouble most of the time I think :P
2 Likes
Unfortunately that is just their way of saying no.
Almost never actually get said buffs when they say “we’ll wait and see”
im sure certain people would disagree. but haters gonna hate.
All CVRTs will reign supreme
5 Likes
Ugh, the problem is going to be the XM800T, which with the 20mm APDS and the stabilizer is a nightmare for any vehicle without a stabilizer, mainly thanks to the devs and their obsession with making maps for CoD or CS, but in tanks that should be fighting at more than 1000 meters (the distance that would be good to use the Scimitar).
2 Likes
Almost there :3
AAAAAA so excited for new Scimmie :3
3 Likes
That ItPsV squad sitting right behind the next corner.
Spoiler
(I mean good that this thing is getting buffed, but FCS that completely deletes gun handling from a vehicle just from recieving a singular MG burst or arty shrapnel still makes it almost unusable)