Like they are currently doing for RU - with introducing wonder weapons like the BMPT and Kh-38MT.
While you and others are defending that - basically saying ‘Well yeah, they don’t really exist like that - but its fair’.
If one side gets weapons/platforms that are unrealistic - then the other side needs them as well.
If Russia is going to continually get this kind of treatment - then yes, like reality - NATO should crush them with its air assets. If balance isn’t going to be maintained for the sake of pro-russian sympathies - then NATO needs it unbalanced weapons and doctrines as well.
No - I stated that if Russia is going to get its bullshit weapons on the ground that it never produced or executed on than NATO air power should be reflected as it is in reality. Completely obliterating all Russian opposition.
That’s quite literally the logic you are trying to argue for them on the ground side.
You don’t get it both ways - either both sides get unbalanced weapons that ruin the game flow, or neither do.
so yes, basically making them dominant in everything so Russia becomes the only useless nation instead of Russia being the only good nation and every each other being the useless ones.
imma tell u something: i own Leopard 2A4M and T-72B3 “Arena”. both are my only toptier tanks rn for both Russia and Germany, and i honestly prefer the 2A4M over any other tank ingame.
i also haven’t died against LMURs and Kh-38MTs that often, something that doesn’t fit with ur opinion of “Mi-28NM and Su-30SM2 everywhere!”, and when i played T-72B3 “Arena” the first time, it was plagued with other T-72B3 “Arena” from the ENEMY TEAM, cuz the amount of people playing with it was so much that the matchmaker needed to join soviet tanks in both teams so the matchmaking time was shorter, and it was honestly skill-based cuz russian tanks are NOT OP.
i would honestly prefer any NATO tank over the russian ones, i would prefer to fly EF-2000 with SPICE 250 or Rafale C F3 with MICA-EMs than Su-30SM2 with 5 Kh-38MT (if u use the T550 pod) or a 3t glide bomb in a fat plane, i would prefer to fly Eurotiger with PARS 3 LR, cool electro-optic station position and maneuverability than Mi-28NM with the same amount of missiles and LDIRCM which only works if u get near the battlefield.
The KH-38MT is OP because of how they implemented it, the thing doesn’t exist to begin with and if it did it wouldn’t have been able to target ground targets like tanks it would be a bit more akin to the ASM-2 (Which has so many issues in its model despite being something that if they fixed would be a pretty good cas weapon)
The T90M and BVM are yes exceptionally trolly and along with the small weak spots actually reliable weak spots created by this trolly armor do very well in a lot of maps where they are often just being put face to face against other tanks with little flanking allowed, so basically unless its a leopard you have the advantage. So I guess its more the maps and current meta that favors them as they can suffer on longer ranged maps.
The SU30SM2 is easily tied for top jet in the game against the Rafale. The only Reason the Rafale is top tier is because of how insane MICAs are. The SU30SM2 radar allows it to maintain hard locks while in the notch against all other missiles making it pretty much the best jousting plane in the game, and with a high missile count and great thrust it can dictate the battlefield extremely well, and in ground RB it has the best air cas in game on it while retaining a decent sized ATA loadout.
The MI-28NM is just broken like every other LDIRCM heli in the game, but is taken a step further by the lmur being the only properly lofting ATGM in the game and getting overpressure (which all this missiles should at this point heat or not they have enough explosive mass in them to rip things into small pieces)
Everybody has OP stuff but to try and argue this stuff isnt all that good is strange because it is, and it reflects in game.
make a bug report or smth, or ask for Gaijin to remove the +4 LMURs of the Mi-28NM.
if they are THAT good then there’s no need of carrying 8 cuz u can still do good with 4, and i agree with it getting nerfed.
The SU-34 does not have a better ground loadout the only difference is you swap the 3k bomb for 1.5k bomb, but unlike the SU-34 you can still retain a full CAP loadout with this of better missiles.
Multiple reports have been made for the Lofting on the ATGM’s gajin has had very few responses to this In the case of spikes and pars they accepted it like two years ago the hellfire’s even further back than that then they never actually touch it, just keep saying “we are working on it”. In the new american missile they either deny it for not enough information or they say that it is working, or my favorite when you provide them with the evidence they say “data mining is not allowed”.
Fr, NATO tanks deserved their turret basket, they were too good without it while russian tanks had the most comparable thing to a turret basket but…WAY more lethal.
there might be a reason why i (not the greatest player), can average a 100 kill to death difference on my clickbait, but only around 40-60 on my T90M and T80BVM
I did need to write that - because of people like you trying to obfuscate and avoid that fact in a literal discussion about balancing said tree that the particular tank is in.
Only one ‘just typing shit’ here is you. Comparing the T34, Ostwind II, T29, T30, E100 and almost everything else on that list to the point I made - at least those require thought to play to some extent and can be countered.
Only two tanks on that list that you can consider remotely close to the toxicity that the BMPT injects into this game is ADATS and the T58. Both of those still require a brain to play somewhat effectively while the BMPT does not.
KH-38MT is relevant because it again goes to what ‘balancing’ looks like for the RU tree from Gaijin’s perspective. Clearly that’s just pulling shit out of their ass to support their biases. We don’t need more make believe russian wonder weapons infecting the tree because people want to cry about problems that don’t exist or aren’t as severe as indicated.
You can deflect and whine as much as you want. My points still stand and are correct.
We all know the BMPT is overpowered, but because im not praising you and making you everlasting king for saying this it means i disagree with you there?
Every US vehicle starting with T/XM is a prototype, but i guess when russia has proto vehicles in its PREMIUM/EXCLUSIVE section its not okay.
Make a specific thread for the KH38MT as you love bashing it in a thread NOT ABOUT it so much.
You just chose to ignore that you have two BMPT’s that are still completely and utterly overtuned?
The problem with them is not just one particular thing, it’s many things.
You have to aim carefully to take these out unless you have around 600mm pen, if it comes at you from the front and the lower plate is obscured your only option is to shoot one of the optics.
If you shoot any one of the guns, the other gun and missiles still operates.
Shooting the missiles doesn’t cause any damage to the tank from the explosion and the guns still operate.
If you shoot and hit the ammo, it is modelled in 4 separate parts and doesn’t cause any blowout or chain reaction, it just cooks of 1/4th of your ammo.
The crew is pretty well hidden so you can’t do any harm by just shooting the turret.
Taking out the normal BMPT is easier due to the bigger gunner optics in the front, though it has 5 crew members instead of 3.
The reactive armour panels on the side has caught me a fair few times as well, you have to aim for the panel lines so you shoot between the panels but might be more of a skill issue.
From just you needing the think about where to shoot these and them just needing to aim in your general direction and start blasting you’re already at a massive disadvantage.
If one of these finds a hull down position against you there is no winning, only running away.
Part of the problem is probably Gaijin code for the ammo as well to be fair. From the damage and penetration values of the ammo, the ammo should probably not be as effective as it is?
