And what does spall do? Nothing? Then why it does destroy other modules perfectly fine, but does not trigger ammunition blowout while being the most sensitive thing?
as i said: i don’t have any problem with Gaijin adding other AGMs that aren’t Kh-38.
im tired of NATO mains crying cuz Kh-38MT is too OP so since i play Russia then let’s make it fair for everyone.
KH38mt is too op. Yes that’s a fact. Mach 2.2 bomb, that gives barely no time to react or intercept. And it’s guaranteed kill just due to insane TNT value, even indirect hit is enough.
Meanwhile historically eurofighters had brimstones with ground radar, ok that’s too much, then give imaginary IR seeker, like MT is. But no no, that would be too op. Lol it can’t overpressure, slow as hell. It’s HEAT warhead so it’s not powerful either, you need to launch few to have an effect. Limit to whatever number, 6 or 8 maybe.
As always double standards.
3 Likes
Dude, NATO mains are complaining, because Gaijin literally made up a weapon just so russian CAS can be the strongest in the game not „just“ because it’s op
Meanwhile nato players have to borderline commit high treason just to get sources that gaijin deems good enough for changes
7 Likes
yeah germany finally get a tank with some hull protection… but russia get this protection from 11.3 br:D
2 Likes
they got Kontakt 5 from 10.3 on T-72B, not talking about only way T-72/T-80/T-90 survive(edit: tank something) because of Kontakt-5 and Relikt
Haven’t you just killed the crew (which means the whole tank) in that shot, but you’re still crying about the ammo not detonating?
Ok, show it.
Cus we’re talking about the MT, which is a mock-up, and Gaijin has refused non-functional mock-ups before for other nations, so the same standard should apply here…
We in fact have info on the purposed Kh-38MT seeker and… it shouldn’t even be able to see a tank from anywhere beyond 2km’s’ish, but in WT it can from 10km’s out, lmao.
1 Like
Could you name 1 thing that the T80U/BVM, any ANY T72/T90 has over their NATO counterparts?
NATO AGMs are bad compared to Kh-38s, that doesn’t mean Mavericks/Brimstones are bad missiles.
btw now multiple nations are getting SPICE 250 and other IR guided CAS weaponry (hell naw, JAS39E has 16 SPICE 250s), so i think that’s the Gaijin’s response to the “complainments” about the Kh-38MT.
1 Like
1: Extra Plates which can only be seen in the CDK which results in less spall which goes into the Ammorack.
2: wierd Bugs which make them stronger:
Like, Commander Cubola not having Collision…
ERA beeing that broken that it can completly catch a Tandem charge…
1 Like
it says the Kh-38M was developed as a “universal AGM”, made to use different seekers, included SAL, IR and ARH.
russian tanks suck, the only good thing of them is their CAS.
1 Like
The issue with it being a “universal AGM” is that there’s zero proof besides mockups that the IR (and the ARH/GNSS seekers if they were in game) seeker head existed…
2 Likes
yeah but u know how Gaijin works, if something is capable of using something but has never been proven, it’s enough for them to add it (even if im completely against that opinion).
Yeah ofc in a game mode where tanks are the baseline every agm is good.
But the KH38MT being a lot better than the competitors is only part of the problem, the main complaint is plain and simply that it doesn’t fulfill the standards that additions to the game should have.
It might be but we’re still comparing Mach 1 release max, low yield warhead gliding coughin baby’s to a Mach 2 huge warhead hydrogen bomb.
2 Likes
have never played GRB with Mavericks, but i used them in the F-15I against AI targets and they can’t get a lock at 20km and don’t make me talk if u’re looking through a cloud…
NATO has always had/preferred quantity over quality… or at least that’s what Gaijin thinks.
That’s not the Kh-38MT
There being a “universal carrier” doesn’t matter when the version Gaijin implemented doesn’t exist, better yet, where did they even get the idea all Sukhoi’s can carry 6 of them? They’re limiting the amount of bombs on the Tornado SLE because “there’s no proof” but somehow Russia isn’t a case of that, lmao.
5 Likes
go make a topic about NATO carrying better things than the ugly Mavericks or AGM-179 having lofting and i will for sure give u a +1. WT is not just Russia and the day i will end my grind for the russian tech tree i will want to grind another nation (and i have been grinding other nations), so i would like to see other nations getting OP things too.
i just play Russia for fun, not cuz they have the best things, and i’m completely against unfair and unjustified superiority.