There you go, first game into t80 driver port. Shell went through frontal layer of ammo in the rack, then through the second layer. Just yellowed. Funny enough all the ammo he had was there.
You can keep your opinion for yourself, it’s waste of time discussing that anyway.
Source?
They aren’t wrong but atp expecting gaijin to be historical with Russian (and basically anyone’s) loadouts is just wishful at best unfortunately…
L27a1 does i believe, but maybe not i could be wrong
Even if they lose 2 its game over lol
The APFSDS round clearly goes over top of the ammunition.
You unironically presented me with a perfect example of what I described earlier:
Metal autoloader shouldn’t be eating spall like its made of thick enough stuff to stop artillery fragments but also not generating spall like it’s too thin to generate spall from a moderately degraded KEP flying through it.
You can’t have both. One or the other but never both.
Turret baskets generate spall last I checked. Autoloaders and the associated metal firewalls/carousel covers do not.
You are blind, aren’t you? Can’t see all the red dots scattered over all of the ammo? From the bottom to the top. LOL.
It doesn’t exist, tho?
Unless you mean AS A MOCK UP, then I guess.
it exists, i even showed a picture of one of them in a museum from a reliable website.
Kh-38 is real, MT is technically a mockup, and sadly that’s enough for Gaijin.
Spall =/= APFSDS rod.
but not enough to buff nato vehicles even with plenty of documents supporting it
And what does spall do? Nothing? Then why it does destroy other modules perfectly fine, but does not trigger ammunition blowout while being the most sensitive thing?
as i said: i don’t have any problem with Gaijin adding other AGMs that aren’t Kh-38.
im tired of NATO mains crying cuz Kh-38MT is too OP so since i play Russia then let’s make it fair for everyone.
KH38mt is too op. Yes that’s a fact. Mach 2.2 bomb, that gives barely no time to react or intercept. And it’s guaranteed kill just due to insane TNT value, even indirect hit is enough.
Meanwhile historically eurofighters had brimstones with ground radar, ok that’s too much, then give imaginary IR seeker, like MT is. But no no, that would be too op. Lol it can’t overpressure, slow as hell. It’s HEAT warhead so it’s not powerful either, you need to launch few to have an effect. Limit to whatever number, 6 or 8 maybe.
As always double standards.
Dude, NATO mains are complaining, because Gaijin literally made up a weapon just so russian CAS can be the strongest in the game not „just“ because it’s op
Meanwhile nato players have to borderline commit high treason just to get sources that gaijin deems good enough for changes
yeah germany finally get a tank with some hull protection… but russia get this protection from 11.3 br:D
they got Kontakt 5 from 10.3 on T-72B, not talking about only way T-72/T-80/T-90 survive(edit: tank something) because of Kontakt-5 and Relikt
Haven’t you just killed the crew (which means the whole tank) in that shot, but you’re still crying about the ammo not detonating?
Ok, show it.
Cus we’re talking about the MT, which is a mock-up, and Gaijin has refused non-functional mock-ups before for other nations, so the same standard should apply here…
We in fact have info on the purposed Kh-38MT seeker and… it shouldn’t even be able to see a tank from anywhere beyond 2km’s’ish, but in WT it can from 10km’s out, lmao.
Could you name 1 thing that the T80U/BVM, any ANY T72/T90 has over their NATO counterparts?
