There you go
Guess what is hard to balance and thus has limited loadouts? Abrams and 2A7 for example, which do not have more powerful rounds because it would powercreep the sht out of a ton of tanks.
Yeah I know? They do the same with the early MIG 29s, limiting loadouts is not new or unique
My point is, they do this for every vehicle across many BRs. Asking for everything to be historical and expecting the BR system to handle it is a garbage idea.
Where’d you get this from, I’m curious
Yeah they limit loadouts a lot. They pretty much never make stuff up, except for one nation.
It’s a difference
Especially since one is entirely negative and the other one entirely positive lol
If you look at its HP/T figures, and then time its acceleration, you’d notice that it doesn’t accelerate like the HP/T would suggest. This issue is also present on Leclerc, BMP-3, 2S38, and Type 10/TKX.
1 Like
Rather keep it that way to not buff the TKX anymore
Necrons has already posted many examples of other nation’s vehicles having completely made up figures.
1 Like
Thanks
30mm ammo usually does not chain detonate, therefore the BMPT is actually modelled better than, say, the Marders. I agree that the Marders need a buff.
Do we have any proof they shouldn’t?
The JAGM does loft.
Not an air player but where can I find some proof?
I believe it’s the 27SM with the double rack engine tunnel racks? Or am I missing something? Again, not an air player.
Also, the 38MT is a seemingly real prototype? There’s been more proof of it’s existence than it being a fake, made up missile
1 Like
Yeah in his nigh infinite wisdom he posted examples that are entirely not the same as the ones I posted, are found everywhere he even gave prove to that, they are not even made up they are literally just how the game works and I don’t even know what half the stuff he wrote is supposed to mean, because there’s 0 description or connection to the points I made.
???
You say only Russia gets made up figures, and when someone gives you examples of other nations getting this treatment, you say its irrelevant?
Perfect so the BMPT gets specialized treatment for some reason.
We have literally less proof that they should than for every single other AGM in the game, no matter of spike, pars or jagm. JAGMS loft a bit but nowhere near to what they should.
There’s a radar spreadsheet in the relevant threads.
Maybe? But there’s literally 0 proof for that rack on the SU30
There literally isn’t. It’s just impossible to proof a negative
Because he didn’t make a single point where something is made up. Read his comment.
He just made up points where I am apparently fine with double standards.
You’re telling me you don’t understand what “SEPv2 having a LWS from a rare prototype” means? Point me to something that’s unclear to you, I’d like to explain it
1 Like
? Rare prototype means tested, means it’s fine to be in game. Ergo not made up.
Don’t @ me just because you don’t know how additions work
Good, that means T-80B thermals aren’t an issue then? Also, can we talk about the missing Podboi spall liners from, say, T-72A?
Edit: also, wtf does “don’t @ me” mean??? we’re on a forum??? the entire point is to @ each other???
1 Like
They aren’t. Necron entirely made up that I take issue with that.
Sure we can, spall liners should be on all vehicles that have them
It means that you don’t have to make a comment towards me just because you don’t understand how and why things are added in this game.
Ight, so just to clear some things up: The only made up thing (outside of air, that’s not my domain) you pointed out so far is Kh-38MT, correct?
1 Like
Nah the belt of the bmpt is still made up. And the loft of the LMUR in comparison to pars, spike and jagm is also made up. (For ground only as per your specs)
Ah yeah and let’s add Iglas vs stingers as well