Their armor always causes the opponent to extend their reaction time and react slower by needing to find and hit the weakspots. You will and DO have people miss the weakspots plenty, and you also don’t need them to miss the weakspots for the armor to already have had an effect in slowing their reactions.
Every single Russian MBT can be killed by a fuel tank explosion. They all suffer from the same weaknesses and issues, such as the flywheel, driver’s hatch, and lower front plate.
Plenty of weaknesses to abuse with ease if you just get good at it.
I mean, it better be?
It was brand new back then. Would be awfully embarrassing to spend all that time on the vehicle only to have it be obsolete the second it enters service.
I don’t waste time going over arguments that’ve already been had before.
1 Like
nothing to do with what I said
I disproved your claim. A lot to do with what you said I think.
Duh.
Convenient thing to say when confronted with an argument that you don’t have an answer to.
No.
Its a reliance on him being slow. Relying on others’ mistakes does not make for a good tank. Also, this isn’t like mid tier, where it takes time to aim for a weakspot. Top tier NATO tanks have 40-20 or 40-40 gun handling (most of them), and it allows you to aim for a weakspot within a fraction of a second.
In a NATO tank you can often just position yourself to not get hit. Why rely on him being bad when you can avoid that entirely.
This difference in reaction time is really not noticeable either.
1 Like
No, it always has an effect. You would die quicker and have less time to react in most nato MBTs. This is always in effect and can’t be countered.
Humans have limits.
And what is said argument? I’m sure it has been discussed in different threads about a billion times.
You’ve also proved my point by talking about people having to extend their reaction time to kill a Russian tank.
Earlier I said Russian tanks rely on enemies being bad at the game and you’ve just agreed to that with your comment.
1 Like
No. Not logical.
If anyone is ragebaiting it’s you bro.
You can say this all you want but reality is a lot more obviously against you.
Why does the BMPT have a separated belt. Why do the LMURS loft as the only AGMs. Why does a PESA get a faster scanrate than modern aesas. Why do the SU30s get fake missile racks. Why is the kh38mt in the game
1 Like
Let’s also not pretend that Russia is alone in having major difficulties getting new arms procurement going.
- The Abrams wasn’t meant to serve beyond 2010, yet here we are with the SEP v3 being expected to serve into the 2030’s.
- Countries are hesitant to purchase Leopard 2’s due to Germany having atrophied their arms production industry.
- The US Navy’s shipbuilding is and has been in utter shambles for decades now. They’ve canned yet another frigate replacement recently.
- The NGAD and nGAD (or whatever they’re choosing to call the navy program nowadays) is massively behind schedule and potentially being cancelled.
- F-35 Block 4 is around a decade behind schedule.
- M10 Booker just got cancelled, which means the infantry still hasn’t got it’s MPF solution.
- Britain’s AJAX program is in shambles from what I’ve read,
- Challenger 3 program seems like an awful lot of money and effort just to create an MBT only on-par with a current/previous generation Leopard, and it’s still going to be produced in very limited numbers.
- FCAS seems like it’s years and years away still.
- German Tornadoes are serving well beyond their intended lifespans, and readiness levels/upkeep are through the roof apparently.
- Canada is taking decades to select their Hornet replacement, a platform which is so old they’re apparently limited to very low G’s due to airframe fatigue.
Etc.
etc.
No, it means I’ve given you answers, you’re just not happy with the answers given.
I’m not obligated to repeat myself.
2 Likes
Die quicker? Not the right wording. I would say that someone who rushed their shot really badly would have a chance of nonpenning.
But again, you got shot, and it quite possibly could’ve been a scenario a NATO tank could’ve avoided entirely.
This doesn’t apply to T-90M/B3/BVM, but other RU tanks have abysmal gun handling and thus NATO tanks with their superior GH and chassis-snappiness definitely react faster.
You don’t play against vegetables. Most people you face will have a developed frontal lobe and a reaction time good enough to snapshot your weakspots.
2 Likes
Definitely not. Vastly overestimating this playerbase. I’m a top 5% grb player even and I still have to take time to aim for weakspots like everybody else also does
Difficulties in arms procurement is a nice euphemism for being poor since the 90s so arms procurement is a strain despite being a literal autocracy that owns the biggest arms manufacturers directly.
You quite literally didn’t engage in a single argument and instead made up some argument in your head that you won. But here’s your second chance, I’ve posted the same question just a bit above.
“Balance” 16x 179 vs 8x LMUR. LDIRCM Helis were a mistake yes. And before you go “oh but the Germans” They had the best heli pre-LDIRCM fnf, and Gaijin loves to flip flop the meta to make people grind new stuff out. Sorry, that’s just how it is.
Huh? I’ve never heard about this. I also don’t play air soooooooooo
Balance. If you say anything about the SM2 I will point you to the Rafale which griefed the entire top tier ARB bracket for 1 year.
Gaijin’s ground vs air balancing. Russia has good CAS but terrible tanks, while NATO has better tanks but worse CAS. This flip-flopped as well in the history of WT top tier.
2 Likes