T-72s were exceptional tanks in their time.
I haven’t done anything for you to say this. You’re just either ragebaiting or genuinely crying.
There’s a reason nobody good says RU tanks are good. Armor isn’t meta. Its only nice to have when you don’t sacrifice in so many aspects it makes the tank utterly miserable.
2 Likes
Guess we’re going with ragebaiting
Russian MBTs aren’t the best and nobody said they were, but their armor does do a lot for them.
People don’t hit your UFP anymore. I guess the side ERA can save you once in 20 times on T-90M.
Their armor makes them just about ‘playable’ because they can’t get quickly killed by autocannons and bad players often fare badly against them.
But they’re just bad tanks.
Tanks that rely on enemies being bad.
Yeah and my grandma was kinda hot in her time
Their armor always causes the opponent to extend their reaction time and react slower by needing to find and hit the weakspots. You will and DO have people miss the weakspots plenty, and you also don’t need them to miss the weakspots for the armor to already have had an effect in slowing their reactions.
Every single Russian MBT can be killed by a fuel tank explosion. They all suffer from the same weaknesses and issues, such as the flywheel, driver’s hatch, and lower front plate.
Plenty of weaknesses to abuse with ease if you just get good at it.
I mean, it better be?
It was brand new back then. Would be awfully embarrassing to spend all that time on the vehicle only to have it be obsolete the second it enters service.
I don’t waste time going over arguments that’ve already been had before.
1 Like
nothing to do with what I said
I disproved your claim. A lot to do with what you said I think.
Duh.
Convenient thing to say when confronted with an argument that you don’t have an answer to.
No.
Its a reliance on him being slow. Relying on others’ mistakes does not make for a good tank. Also, this isn’t like mid tier, where it takes time to aim for a weakspot. Top tier NATO tanks have 40-20 or 40-40 gun handling (most of them), and it allows you to aim for a weakspot within a fraction of a second.
In a NATO tank you can often just position yourself to not get hit. Why rely on him being bad when you can avoid that entirely.
This difference in reaction time is really not noticeable either.
1 Like
No, it always has an effect. You would die quicker and have less time to react in most nato MBTs. This is always in effect and can’t be countered.
Humans have limits.
And what is said argument? I’m sure it has been discussed in different threads about a billion times.
You’ve also proved my point by talking about people having to extend their reaction time to kill a Russian tank.
Earlier I said Russian tanks rely on enemies being bad at the game and you’ve just agreed to that with your comment.
1 Like
No. Not logical.
If anyone is ragebaiting it’s you bro.