I didn’t say it’s a bad tank, it’s actually my best performing one. I say that there are not so many good Abrams players around and your data proves it. The chinese Abrams is the only one with positive WR atm, does it say that statistically it is better than the others? It just says that good players utilize it better than the others and this applies to every tank in the game.
1 Like
The T-72B3M is too strong for 11.3. The T-90A is literally NOTHING compared to it yet that sits at 11.0.
I don’t know why they moved it down from 11.7 after the decompression
You are insane. T90s has broken 3d model which is hard to kill. All T series tank has 6 second reload. Russians are op. Unlesss you play againts skilled players since there is masive weak point at bottom of tank.
1 Like
More than enough with that broken model like BMPT…
It has a lot of drawbacks that other 11.3s don’t have.
The acceleration is decent but the top speed and especially the reverse speed is lacking.
The gun depression is pretty bad.
The reload is pretty bad compared to the 5s reload of the IPM1 and the 6s reload of the Merkava Mk.3.
The only good thing about it is the armour, though like I said previously:
You can definitely make it work, and I think any lower and it may be too good, but it’s definitely not OP.
Well the T-90A is 0.3 BR lower than it and gets the better turret armour at the cost of acceleration and side RELIKT ERA. I think that’s a reasonable trade-off.
Also the T-90M could go to 12.3 and if that isn’t enough, I wouldn’t see a problem with it going to 12.0… though I would really like if top tier got decompressed even more (at least to 13.0) so that such tanks don’t have to face 11.0s and 11.3s.
1 Like
The effectiveness of an MBT shouldn’t be measured by it taking a hit or two before dying, it should be measured by the effect it has on the opposing team.
Just sitting somewhere taking hits is barely relevant to the outcome of a battle, in contrast, reaching powerpositions quickly, dominating sight lines, scoring multiple kills and securing caps is FAR more useful.
This is what I mean when I say: ‘inexperienced players can be easily identified by them overrating the importance of armour’.
Happens to all tanks:
Only because the BMPT is broken.
Not because the T-80BVM, T-90M, T-72B3A, etc. etc. are better than their opposition.
Uhhh…
Should I be worried?
Is there medication involved?
I try to keep myself to ranking stuff which I have some experience with, that’s why there’s a bunch missing and why there’s BR gaps.
There’s a few in there that I don’t own so that’s why I’m also fully open to people pointing out if/why they disagree with the ranking.
1 Like
Yeah basically.
I personally think the T-72B3M is 2x better than the T-90A.
The T-90A might be able to go to 10.7 tbf.
The T-72B3M is just much snappier, faster, and has overall better hull armor. The difference between it and the T-90A shouldn’t be 0.3 of a BR, that’s all lol.
What are the reasons
I mean, you can definitely do that. I don’t disagree with your rankings but it just goes to show how overtiered the T-72B3A, Ariete AMV, and T-90M are.
You may want to ‘experience’ them first before ranking but I assume you are knowledgeable enough to know what would be good and what wouldn’t be based on GRB and Tourney METAs.
That being said,
5 KPS is very much possible depending on how you look at it…
Yeah exactly that’s why the armata will not be added in 3 years but much earlier. Fighting the newest gen of western mbts in a „T90 but they finally reached the new millennium“ is not gonna be a lot of fun.
Shit like that is btw why I have 0 confidence that the T14 will not be broken on release
2 Likes
2x better for better side armour, acceleration, and gun handling (with a hint of extra gun depression)?
You still have the same hull armour, same awful reload, worse turret armour, and awful reverse speed.
If it had the T-80’s reverse speed then it would definitely be 11.7 or even 12.0 (considering the T-80UE-1 is at 12.0 with a worse dart and hull armour for better top speed and acceleration).
I think the T-80UK (which is 11.7) is generally better off just because of the mobility – even if it means sacrificing the gun handling and better round.
Well, the Bhishma is a T-90A with only 3BM42, so I’d assume not.
1 Like
My point is that the T-14 Armata as it is on paper is way better than anything else there is at the moment. They shouldn’t add it until other countries develop something equal and that might not happen for years.
5 KPS is only achievable in a squadded cherry-picked spawning type of playstyle, or just camping (ie you wont win). There’s just too many factors to make a 5 KPS realistic at top tier. 4 KPS is like the upper limit.
Well, what’s your definition of ‘Top Tier’?
Wouldn’t be the first time.
Also fat lol towards the equal
I’d say like 11.7-12.7, but 11.3 might also count depending on how you look at it.
Now of course there are probably a few players who are just that good, but its a VERY small percentage.
