this is not unique to BUK. at least that ones missile trucks can operate autonomously.
Ever having faith in Gaijin is a blunder.
bruh
theres a few members of this forum who should be prime hires for WT, saw one guy that redid the xray of panthers to be much better. Theres actual talent that could make things much better.
I agree that there shouldn’t be things unrelated to the topic here, I also think that questioning one’s biases is inappropriate and I should try to disprove that, preferably with data and not vibes
SEPv4’s only in-game improvement would’ve been afaik gen 3 thermals (heh), but it’s not needed as there’s gonna be/or there already is, SEPv3 mod 2 with gen 3s installed.
I don’t think Gaijin will model the 2A8 accurately at all tho, so the v3 mod 2 could be a good counterpart, but if they lock in and model the 2A8 as it should be, well…
Tbh i played with the 2A4M and i honestly don’t feel it’s “unfair” that they have turret baskets.
Imo it’s a fair nerf for the NATO superior tanks.
And apparently the cyclogram alone wasn’t enough, hm? I know resding the entire post is hard work.
Yes you are, because I am not advocating for realistic reloads, whatever that would even mean for manually loaded tanks. I was just pointing out that using the recent massive buff as an example how russia gets treated unfairly doesn’t make a lick of sense.
? Only one tree is profiting from balancing via selective realism, this is not playing sides, it’s a fact.
It’s an example but I guess the concept is novel to you?
It’s a ragebait post anyway, who cares
I was waiting for that one. Statshaming is the absolute classic when the botniks are out of actual arguments.
I am aware and it’s fine not knowing something. It’s just insanely funny, because that happens every single time with this topic and it’s very convenient that those guys can never engage with half the points. It can be a fact and convenient at the same time.
But have they re-added the adjustable suspension from BMP-3 that allows the tank to gain additional gun depression?
That’s basically the only thing I would want for the 2S25M
Just because mockup exist doesnt mean it will perform like this.
We dont know how seeker performs when its installed on missile nor we have data about how KH-38MT actually perform in the first place because it’s a MOCKUP design.
Stop trying to justify one of the most broken additions in to this game.
Basically this… the first problem is that he(she?) is not the only one, and the second problem is when Russian is gone, they will find another “scarecrow” and the cycle will begin anew…
No. As far as I know, this is a feature of the prototype/early BMP-3, and it hasn’t been present on production vehicles for a long time.
You can interpret whatever you want but if something doesn’t belong at the highest BR then it just shouldn’t be there instead of artificially bringing it there (or bringing the others down to the same level)
Germany and Italy don’t have a highest BR heli simply because they don’t operate one irl and Gaijin is not stepping in to make up anything for them. I don’t see why anyone else should be treated differently.
Its not ur NATO doing better, maybe doing 518 games equal to ur BVM games then check back with the stat please.
Both Germany and Italy (well maybe not as much for Italy) had Helicopters with FnF missiles before anyone else… and as for the Japane/Britain/France (and the same way Japan/Sweden go for fixed wing CAS) they will get they’re “supplement” in due time… just becous they had it before anyone else (along with Israel), they will have to wait a bit longer.
Exactly and back then they were the top br helis and no one else got made up stuff just so they have top br equipment as well. They just had to wait until Gaijin added real equipment with the same capabilities.
I don’t se anyone asking for a made up stuff here… the OP want a minor reload speed increase with is 50/50 reasnoble. By “50/50” a mean - its nice to have, but we can live without it.
The problem I see is the constant “russian bias”/russophobia that falows such threads, comming from the same people that haven’t even touchet a USSR/Russian vechicles in game.
The problem is not OP asking, the problem is that the made up stuff to facilitate top BR competitiveness is already there.
And your argument is completely moot. You don’t need to play russia to see and call out selective realism, its a fact that literally doesn’t change.
lol.
Italy can have Spike ER2 for its D Mangusta already + AW249
So can Israel and France but that’s not the problem.
Problem is neither of those helicopters does have LDIRCM which is main selling point of top tier helicopters.
Lack of ldircm > any spike/pars buff. Unless it man in the loop ofc but it’s 101% impossible.
First of all, this is literally selective favourable treatment for a single vehicle (or well 2 but they’re both BMPT’s so whatever)
And 2nd of all, wanna give a source for that claim?
BMPT doesnt have blowout panels, no IM/LOVA-ammunition (not that its modelled in-game to begin with) and the ammunition-feed isnt separated from the crew compartment whatsoever.