Thanks for calling me a bot, appreciated, anyway, I don’t feel comfortable speaking about air because i don’t know enough about it. It’s called restraint, you should try using it instead of coping about russian bias.
I don’t know anything about naval because it’s the most boring and useless addition to the game and I wish i could uninstall that part of the game so it wouldn’t take up my disc space.
Do you remember how the exhaust blocked the thermals on the BMP-2M until Merkavas got added?
Do you remember how the Soviet autoloaders were artificially nerfed until recently?
It’s called convenient since it always means that you guys can perfectly choose the arguments you want to engage with. Really nicely halfs the valid examples for you so there’s 0 reason to broaden one’s knowledge or read into things.
No I don’t remember some random ass bug from forever ago which is nowhere near the same as actively programming fakes.
You mean the thing Gaijin fixed instantly to best possible values once there were proper sources available without any BR changes while everyone else is stuck with non optimal reload rates for balance purposes?
Getting called out for trying not to talk about stuff I know nothing about sure is an experience. Please consider buying a one way ticket to Switzerland/Canada, depending on your continent of residence.
It’s not a random ass bug, it was confirmed multiple times that they weren’t planning on doing anything about it. That is until Israeli Merkavas came out. Maybe it’s Mossad secretly running Gaijin, who knows.
You mean the values that got changed after 8 years of being wrong and still aren’t close to the best case scenario (which is around 4s btw) so everybody is stuck with non optimal reload rates for balance purposes?
If you were truly advocating for realistic reloads you’d be advocating for 20+s reloads when moving and reload resetting upon hard impacts on manually loaded tanks. The 5s reload while falling off a cliff at 70kph is the most unrealistic reload related thing currently in game.
Ofc you are, because conveniently that’s all of you. Half knowledge but talking like the big Bois.
Ok let me spell it out for you. Bmpt belt modeled as 2, more work than one. Kh38mt added instead of just not, more work for gaijin. LMUR lofting correct compared to just copy and pasting the values from pars and spike that came before, more work for the devs.
This is not Gaijin being classically lazy, this is actively putting in work to make russia artificially better.
Fat lol for the 4 secs. It literally got changed install once a proper sources were there. Everyone else is sitting at what their are partially despite proper sources.
I’m not, you’re once again making things up in your head. Just complaining about that change from the profiting side is conpletely ridiculous
I’d like you to read this where Stona states that Gaijin has been aware of these cyclograms for a long time.
You’re talking about how some things are made up and unrealistic yet when I bring up unrealistic reload times while we’re discussing unrealistic reload times I’m somehow making things up in my head?
Can we please not “play” sides? Or at least until the GRU starts paying me, I’m not gonna do this for free… (Saab and other manufacturers are also welcome, please contact me via my email.)
This one thought is especially jupiterean, who would’ve thought that working on new content requires work
this is not unique to BUK. at least that ones missile trucks can operate autonomously.
Ever having faith in Gaijin is a blunder.
bruh
theres a few members of this forum who should be prime hires for WT, saw one guy that redid the xray of panthers to be much better. Theres actual talent that could make things much better.
I agree that there shouldn’t be things unrelated to the topic here, I also think that questioning one’s biases is inappropriate and I should try to disprove that, preferably with data and not vibes
SEPv4’s only in-game improvement would’ve been afaik gen 3 thermals (heh), but it’s not needed as there’s gonna be/or there already is, SEPv3 mod 2 with gen 3s installed.
I don’t think Gaijin will model the 2A8 accurately at all tho, so the v3 mod 2 could be a good counterpart, but if they lock in and model the 2A8 as it should be, well…
And apparently the cyclogram alone wasn’t enough, hm? I know resding the entire post is hard work.
Yes you are, because I am not advocating for realistic reloads, whatever that would even mean for manually loaded tanks. I was just pointing out that using the recent massive buff as an example how russia gets treated unfairly doesn’t make a lick of sense.
? Only one tree is profiting from balancing via selective realism, this is not playing sides, it’s a fact.
It’s an example but I guess the concept is novel to you?
It’s a ragebait post anyway, who cares
I was waiting for that one. Statshaming is the absolute classic when the botniks are out of actual arguments.
I am aware and it’s fine not knowing something. It’s just insanely funny, because that happens every single time with this topic and it’s very convenient that those guys can never engage with half the points. It can be a fact and convenient at the same time.
Just because mockup exist doesnt mean it will perform like this.
We dont know how seeker performs when its installed on missile nor we have data about how KH-38MT actually perform in the first place because it’s a MOCKUP design.
Stop trying to justify one of the most broken additions in to this game.
Basically this… the first problem is that he(she?) is not the only one, and the second problem is when Russian is gone, they will find another “scarecrow” and the cycle will begin anew…
You can interpret whatever you want but if something doesn’t belong at the highest BR then it just shouldn’t be there instead of artificially bringing it there (or bringing the others down to the same level)
Germany and Italy don’t have a highest BR heli simply because they don’t operate one irl and Gaijin is not stepping in to make up anything for them. I don’t see why anyone else should be treated differently.
