Now watch as I quote some random logical fallacy instead of adding some basis to my initial claim, look who’s the midwit now 👀
A logical fallacy ?
Just cough up some counter evidence mate, this whole discussion is pointless because all you’re doing is running circles around the original subject, being corruption affecting quality in a certain nation’s military
Evidence of what ? That thing based on nothing on feelings of “expert” you can’t pretend that statements without proofs is objective thing.
This is what I mean

moment
Oh dear, according to said index the country I’m from rates an 88/100 (2nd in the world), whereas Russia scores a 22/100 (154th in the world, and 4x worse)
Maybe that’s why you are so happy to deny the legitimacy of CPI
You are aware that expert opinions and „feelings“ are a pretty standard set of data commonly used in statistics? Not everything can be pulled from completely objective data that why statisticians sometimes have to do a Direct survey
So on what it’s legitimacy is builded ?
That doesn’t make CPI or other corruption indexes objective
The fact that it’s a recognised metric for most notable anti-corruption organisations, and used as the metric to judge public sector corruption globally
It doesn’t have to be to be relevant
This sounds like problem not a proof.
Then this not better than cult.
Seems you upset the weeb femboys.
Seems my 70€ was well spent, successful ragebait off of a profile image alone xD
Dude says im using fallacy and starts appealing to authority that is something
Ragebait ? I don’t think so, im just observing.
You realise this whole ‘midwit’ shtick makes you look like a redditor than before, just drop it mate it looks silly. I argue in logic not semantics
No it’s just a rage bait and it worked on you
