The T64 auto loader was historically worse than the 72s no? But if it got a buff to the reload they would likely be moved up.
The 64B especially
It’s the most annoying thing about the damn Chines mbts dude, it just makes them feel as if they can’t be played as fast as other top tiers.
Well, the M1A2T will entirely solve the issue. And serve as a fairly good test case for Higher BR’s too.
We really are just getting copy and paste now lol
Yep a whole lot of T-series tanks are getring a reload buff.
Although the Chinese reload buffs are a bit of a joke lol.
Yeah I just seen it there man lol 6 seconds, VT4A1 6.66 and the ZTZ’s get to sit at a whopping 7 !! wow
lamo,cm502kg=LUMR
no.
Maybe they were worse, in terms of reliability or safety, but they definitely were faster
NERA dosent stand for NATO ERA
NERA stands for Non-Explosive-Reactive-Armor
thats why those pannels are so thick
Why shouldn´t the T64 be louder? The Abrams isn´t particulary loud for a tank.
He might be talking about actual ERA tho, like the AZUR ERA blocks which are absolute chonkers but only offer 450mm chemical and 20mm kinetics protection vs the T90Ms paper thin ERA which offers 600mm chemical and 200mm kinetic
iam not to knowledgeable about ERA, but isnt the ERA on the T-90 from 2010+?
and they arent to thin either
ik it isnt one from the front but the ones in the damage model are literally floating 30cm above the upf
The vacuum machine is already one of the loudest engine in the game lol
Neither am i but isnt the T90Ms ERA just Relict, which would be 2006ish in introduction?
Its more about the side which seem super thin compared to the ones on the Leclerc and some Challengers, maybe the model of the T90M is just horrible in game (which wouldnt surprise me). But i think its somewhat justified to question 33% more chemical protection and ten times the kinetic protection on a smaller ERA block
on the side skirts after you stock grind them you get different ERA
cant give you the stats since i have none of the tanks that get that skirt ERA
But those ERA are not the ones my values from above are from. I took the ones i can see which are the stock relic
those values are at an angle, flat on they provide much lower protection, they do overperform flat on, but they dont provide 200ke and 600ke flat on.
yeah idk
iam not really in the mood to dive into an ERA rabbit hole rn and look at different ERA’s
all i know is that relict basically throws a metal plate into the direction of the round
They were worse for their reliability and such irl.
Yeah thats my point man not the speed, just a general discussive point.