Yes they where…
The T64s when first designed were plagued with reliability issues, the auto loader being one of said issues, unless the tank museums wrong.
Engine issues, transmission issues as well as auto loader issues are registered on the military trails as such.
It had less issues than 72, especially regarding engine&transmission.
Tank museums could be more than wrong, especially if those are propaganda-spread ones.
imagine if Gaijin remove the KH38MT due to fake just to add the 59. That would be really funny
gaijin wont do that since the Kh-59 is TV only
and it will be useless unless they model MITL
Hope they add the agm 84 slam
Would be a good reason to model it
NATO AGM that does actual damage? Don’t be ridiculous.
But honestly if these leaks become true then that premium SU30 will demolish USSR winrates
What on earth is that take, if we abide by the same logic, the type 10 should get it’s 1.5-2 second ripple fire mode sustained for it’s whole ammo rack
Oh! We´ll get the M113 Zelda! Awesome news!
Aren’t those the remotely controlled M113’s converted into bombs they are using in Gaza?
My bad. It seems I got the name wrong. Zeldas are apparently the remote controlled ones. Thank you.
Google it mate.
T72 Had less.issues mechanically becuase it wasn’t designed to be as technically advanced.
The T64 had a plethora of issues one of which was the unreliability of its engine…
Generally the Bovington tank museum isn’t really propaganda based…
T64A shares the same speed as a T-72A. 7.1 secs
T-64B(V, technically) shares the MZ loader, which is 6.0 secs
Museums aren’t the most trust worthy source of all time… they get many things wrong.
For example there’s one in Russia that has su25 on display with imposssible loadouts
Relict ERA was unveiled at the 2015 Victory parade, which featured the T14 Armata, and T-90M.
Ngl getting the Armata at 12.3 would be sweet.
Relict was quite literally designed to fight KE far greater than K-5 and still have good Heat protection.
The stats for the newest Malachite would be interesting to see, as that’s primary role is to stop KE.
Doesn’t meant that it works against “ERA bypass” methods.
What the hell are you even talking about
yes, but its mechanics relies on the angle of attack, at 0º they would not provide any more protection than the thickness of its plate against ke, against CE should also be lower like on the case of k1 and k5
