T64A shares the same speed as a T-72A. 7.1 secs
T-64B(V, technically) shares the MZ loader, which is 6.0 secs
T64A shares the same speed as a T-72A. 7.1 secs
T-64B(V, technically) shares the MZ loader, which is 6.0 secs
Museums aren’t the most trust worthy source of all time… they get many things wrong.
For example there’s one in Russia that has su25 on display with imposssible loadouts
Relict ERA was unveiled at the 2015 Victory parade, which featured the T14 Armata, and T-90M.
Ngl getting the Armata at 12.3 would be sweet.
those values are at an angle, flat on they provide much lower protection, they do overperform flat on, but they dont provide 200ke and 600ke flat on.
Relict was quite literally designed to fight KE far greater than K-5 and still have good Heat protection.
The stats for the newest Malachite would be interesting to see, as that’s primary role is to stop KE.
Relict was quite literally designed to fight KE far greater than K-5
Doesn’t meant that it works against “ERA bypass” methods.
What the hell are you even talking about
Relict was quite literally designed to fight KE far greater than K-5 and still have good Heat protection.
yes, but its mechanics relies on the angle of attack, at 0º they would not provide any more protection than the thickness of its plate against ke, against CE should also be lower like on the case of k1 and k5
That saying “its designed to do x” is a pretty worthlesss statement on its own
I just hope for 13.7 air premiums.
It just has stronger explosion.
Just wish USA tested it… or smbd else trustworthy
Just wish USA tested it
Is it somehow not 3rd gen ERA?
Kontact-1 > Kontact-5 > Relikt > Monolith/Malachit
What is with the T58 and other USA vehicles getting their true reload, but, Russian auto loaders are capped? I hope that the leak is true, and the reloads are getting fixed, but bug reporting it with documents keeps getting labeled as “not a bug” what’s going on here??
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/trxH1z4EEHCc
Relict came out post m829A4 though no? So it’s effectiveness against said ERA may not be as good.
No.
Did it? Where did you get the late introduction date from? Most sources cite a mid 2000s introduction date for Relict
I guess it may have been 2006-2008? It’s hard to say, many sources I have seen are all over the place.
I don’t recall seeing them using it on anything pre 2015 though.
Even sources online say it debuted in 2015 on the T-14 Armata / T-90M
So I do find it hard to believe they already had a shell developed for an ERA never seen.
there is pic of relict produced 2013, so even earlier. stop coping lmao
You know, it’s called a discussion, but when you bring up that stupid “coping” nonsense, you make yourself look like a complete fool whom has lost the discussion/ argument.
you are coping.
that is fact, sorry.
it has 0 connections to losing anything.
Well i mean by the time they are seen in a parade or something intelligence agencies probably know about stuff like this for quite a while. And the contract for the M829a4 was awarded in 2011 so that would kinda track as a reaction to a 2006-2008 introduction. Additionally heavy ERA is not really a new concept so id guess everyone expected russia to upgrade their kontakt 5 at some point