How do you arrive to the conclusion i was talking about NERA ?
I said NATO ERA, the one on the side skirts of Leclerc, Challengers, Abrams and what not
becasue i had a similar conversation before
No, they werent.
Also, you cant really repair AZ in field, but you can with MZ.
I am aware how Relict is supposed to work i just find it a bit questionable that a vastly smaller ERA would provide much better protection against kinetic AND chemical rounds. Like kinetic makes sense since that it whats its supposed to do and AZUR is an urban warfare kit but being so much better at both?
Heh fair enough
Still, as H_ngma_ specified, having paper thin side ERA with more resistance to kinetic AND chemical compared to a literal brick is quite non sensical
2 Likes
Yes they where…
The T64s when first designed were plagued with reliability issues, the auto loader being one of said issues, unless the tank museums wrong.
Engine issues, transmission issues as well as auto loader issues are registered on the military trails as such.
1 Like
It had less issues than 72, especially regarding engine&transmission.
Tank museums could be more than wrong, especially if those are propaganda-spread ones.
imagine if Gaijin remove the KH38MT due to fake just to add the 59. That would be really funny
1 Like
gaijin wont do that since the Kh-59 is TV only
and it will be useless unless they model MITL
Hope they add the agm 84 slam
Would be a good reason to model it
NATO AGM that does actual damage? Don’t be ridiculous.
But honestly if these leaks become true then that premium SU30 will demolish USSR winrates
2 Likes
What on earth is that take, if we abide by the same logic, the type 10 should get it’s 1.5-2 second ripple fire mode sustained for it’s whole ammo rack
Oh! We´ll get the M113 Zelda! Awesome news!
1 Like
Aren’t those the remotely controlled M113’s converted into bombs they are using in Gaza?
My bad. It seems I got the name wrong. Zeldas are apparently the remote controlled ones. Thank you.
Google it mate.
T72 Had less.issues mechanically becuase it wasn’t designed to be as technically advanced.
The T64 had a plethora of issues one of which was the unreliability of its engine…
Generally the Bovington tank museum isn’t really propaganda based…
1 Like
T64A shares the same speed as a T-72A. 7.1 secs
T-64B(V, technically) shares the MZ loader, which is 6.0 secs
Museums aren’t the most trust worthy source of all time… they get many things wrong.
For example there’s one in Russia that has su25 on display with imposssible loadouts