All auto loaders either go one way or the other based on RNG.
Genuinely having used them for japan, france, china and Russia the carousels tend to detonate more in my subjective experience.
Though for China they have saved me a good few times.
This nonsense folks keep parroting (not you) that somehow russian auto loaders soak more is just frustrating.
All modules both soak and generate it, I’ve got a replay from tbe other night of my abrams soaking the damage to the turret basket and then me proceeding to turn around and kill both the STRF 40 BILL that hit me 3 times witb missiles and his bud in a leopard.
Only the 12.3 one and the 12.7 one to some extend lol.
Now you might say “but you are known to be hilariously biased against the Hornet”. Which would be entirely correct, but that doesn’t mean I’m wrong about the 14.0 Hornets being mid.
so with new update gaijin buff russian mbts reload pl gaijin nerf nato mbts for 10 sec min to be more balanced toptier + ad su30 plane in russian premium to all russian main buy this jet and with kh38 onlirate enemy ream more gg this really balanced and fair… afther 1 monts from update 70% of players play russia afther this update make to 80-90% min so gg
I disagree, with russian tanks getting their unrealistic best case scenario reloads, I think the abrams should get its best case reload of 3.5 seconds, and that we need CBU105 immediately
TL;DR since you cannot argue with logic, and have gone back to “nu uh” arguments, I don’t see a reason to continue debating with you, your wrong, and continue to be wrong.
He literally pierced the bulkhead to the ammo storage, you can see it in the hit cam, so no, I still disagree.
Look closer, the door gets clipped as well as the ammo
A lot of cases when I get hit people complain “the auto loader ate it!” But they also don’t realize I’m bring like 12-16 shells merely to avoid exploding, so often the shell goes through the empty spaces which are however many mms thick for the clasps to the shells, which wouldn’t generate tons of spall.
I rarely say I’ve never seen a worse argument, but this takes the cake.
You want the automatic loader, which is typically good for 3000 continuous rounds, known for having a 6.0 sec reload… to be slower…?
Okay, T-58, HSTVL, RDFLT, all need mass nerfs then due to your double standard.
And even in the “best case” scenario for loading for an abrams, which would be a lap load.
Then they need to add:
If the loader is hit with the shell in his hands, it acts like ammo and can detonate.
Driving any speed over 15 mph increase load time.
Driving over non flat terrain increase load time.
Receiving non penetrating or penetrating hits shakes the tank, therefore knocks the gunner off balance, giving an rng value to increase load time.
Since the ammo bulkhead isn’t automatic, and a button press is required, it is rng if the loader missed the button, further adding to increasing the load time.
swinging the turret will make the loader come off balance, further increasing the load time.
I could keep adding, and that would to apply to all manual loaded systems, +/- some aspects like challys not having blowout panels.
Or, simply, they give true reloads for everything. Make manual loaders such as abrams 5.5 secs.
T-72s, T-64A, and T-80B stuck with their 7.1 sec load time.
T-80Us or any given the MZ loader, given their 6.0 sec
Things like leo2a7 going from 6.0 secs to 6.25 or 6.5 secs.
Which as an example, greatly balances the scales for everyone.
The fact China and USSR have been left behind the NATO powercreep for so long is weird.
Especially when USSR and China have tanks of chronically average armor.
You’re willingly blind. The shell goes from one side to the other without piercing the blast door. Again, blowout panels not working during reload because the blast door is open was added so many years ago. It might even have been added back in 2018 with update 1.81 Valkyries alongside the IPM1. You were just ignorant of a game mechanic that exists in the game, simple as that.
And if you’re so convinced I’m wrong, find someone in your squadron to test blowout panels during reload, then post the video here to prove you’re right.
I think they are just coping. The T-80s are just decent now so this reload buff will be nice for them while also very likely not having a massive impact in overall MBT balance.
Although I find it ironic that the T-80s get a decent reload buff but the arguably worse T-72s and T-90s at top tier get either nothing or a whole 0.1 second reload buff.
I feel like the t64s might need to move up with this buff but will have to see about how top tier changes, because now t80s will out reload the average Leo which is effectively a massive nerf for 2a5 and 2a6
Oh I take nearly 30 rounds in the abrams. I think the blowouts work up to 40.
The T-64s sound like loud lawnmowers as is. They’re somehow louder than an abrams.
I like how you didn’t respond to the reloads I mentioned.
Like there is a literal document that proves the mz loader loads as quick as 6.0 secs if not quicker
The chinese mbts should get one as well by all means.
The 7.1 second reload is their major flaw imo , tbh they all should if one gets a buff most carousel loaders should.
Wait what is the buff? All carrousel loaders are gonna reload faster?
The leopards will ve fine ive, they have better rounds as well as depression, turret traverse etc.
T64b would need to be 10.0 finally .
I take only 20 due to meaninf theres less to blowup , if at all.
