I mean it lives all the shell types of the SovetSky with ease. It’s legitimately like winning the lotto if you hit the ammo and it detonates.
Like post 7.3 ground, how German shells magically don’t explode after getting destroyed, the scharn has a odd tendency to take absurd amounts of damage to its magazine, with shells hitting it 7 or more times with no detonation.
Not sure if I have clips of that anymore, I can look, but no promises, I was pretty pissed, so I clipped it to bug report it, but gaijin hates me lol, so they label everything “not a bug”
I think a dev server C-5 should’ve come on the F-18s, but the F-15E should’ve gone to 14.3 if they wanted it to have it. Right now, I think the EFT and Rafale should go to 14.7, with the EFT getting more accurate C-5s, and the F-15E should be 14.3 with 120C-5s. For Russia, they should get the Su-30SM2 at 14.7.
It’s not as good as aim-120s, but I’d hesitate to call it bad. The Su-30 is the only non 120 carrier I see doing BVR at the start of the match, so it can’t be that bad.
The Su-30 can BVR, but typically only when the opposition decides to keep flying at the R-77-1, I wouldn’t say it’s good past… idk 12 miles though. Aim-120 I could probably squeak 16 miles out of if I’m lucky.
I think the Su-30sm is merely better than other Soviet counter parts for 2 big reasons. Radar refresh rate, and turning ability. Otherwise it might as well be a heavier Su-27sm
My favorite trick is force a turn fight, turn AOA limits off, and flip, lock an R-77-1 and launch.
The F-16 was certainly better, especially the aim-9m equipped one.
You’re legit crazy if you think the F-15E/I wasn’t. The E got buffed the day it came out or second day, matching the engine output of the I. They are still
I’m pretty sure the fastest plane in WT acceleration wise for an afterburning aircraft And possibly top end.
Show me you know nothing, by not telling me. Sheesh
Wouldn’t F-15 be all inclusive then? And F-15A was still quite good.
These kind of blatantly misleading comments really make me wonder why I continue to put up with you. You undersell anything USA related. Even if it’s got all the stats to back it up.
Weren’t you also defending the T58? If so, that aged very poorly.
it was a one trick pony, it was worse for dogfighting and close ranges than many other planes when it was added but apparently ARH missiles that you can kinematicly dodge are an insane concept for warthunder players, especially with 100m multipath
no?
it very much was not, gripen was much better in a dogfight and su27 was a better missile bus
both of them were worse than mig 29 and mirage 2000 on release for air rb or sb