Mostly just bad players weighing down NATO. Russia’s got all the sweats right now, but the BVM and T-90M aren’t that great compared to the Abrams and Leopard.
6 Likes
Gaijin stated years ago that this is literally the reason why the reload time is the way it is in War Thunder for T-tanks. So that it’s a middle ground to simulate different type of shells in the autoloader. They also said back then that it would change when/if they add the ability to choose how you want to load your autoloader. It was either Smin in the old forum that’s now dead, or bvvd himself in one of the Russian dev stream. Deal with it.
I’d be interested to know from where you’re pulling your ‘fact based’ 6.25 seconds average reload time for the Abrams when the Abrams crews I personally spoke to and the comments you can find online about this subject pretty much all point to 5 seconds being the average for good loaders. And 7 seconds being the absolute basic qualification.
1 Like
Again really bad examples.
-
Sachrnhorst was way better than every other ship at its br for the longest time, the SovetSky is not the same case. All those new bbs except the Yamato are pretty similar, all can one shot, all can be one shot.
-
Dude… you did not just say R-73s are better than aim-9ms… I’d take an aim 9m any day of the week.
-
Indefensible ERA? Care to explain? Because the way you’ve just worded it, makes it sound like ERA is useless.
F-14
F-16
F-15
F-18
All are / were top dogs on their release, especially the F-14 and F-15.
There was no equal in the skies for awhile.
T58 my man. I got a 4.0 kd in it, and it’s only going higher.
1 Like
The F18 was NOT a top dog on release. Gripen and Su-27 were/are better than the 15A
Uhuh.
Different row…which is kinda obvious looking at the space after indefensible
But its great to see that you also completely missed the point of the comment even though the explanation is literally in the first sentence
I was talking about the F-15E
F-15I was outright better
That is not how it works at all. Striking the ammo storage from the side mid enemy reload does not cause an instant knockout.
Deal with what? They never declared that’s how it works! You’re literally making things up.
Also, taking every clip I could find online, the average loader actually loaded in 6.76 secs or something, I did the math in a post a long time ago. The sample size was 20 loaders.
Why did I do this? I was sick of the bs the US mains come up with, with their sub 3 sec loads etc. even some guy claiming to be a tanker submitted a clip, and it wasn’t even a full reload, nor was it any quicker than 5 secs or at 5 secs.
You do understand people make up crap in the military to sound cool? I am a USMC vet, and the amount of crap I hear come out of peoples mouth is insane. Most were grunts or someone who did nothing, and came up with stories to make them sound cool.
Even so, the F-15E or I was top dog. Could outrun anyone, kill anyone, was a veritable jack of all trades
1 Like
It went fast. That’s about it.
Also, since the AIM-120’s are so gimped, it’s in a pretty horrible position now.
u are nitpicking whatever is favorable for your narrative. both us n chinese heli are overperforming just as much as the mi28 . adding 16xjagm-mrs when only 1 was tested irl ? su30sm is not the best plane in game.
Oh boy here comes someone else who doesn’t understand how naval works… alright what’s your point that I will show you your wrong about in my next reply?
Your arguments continue to be “you missed the point” when you hardly if at all explained your point. Or are you just out of points? Probably.
Well they are made to go on those quad launchers.
And the US/Chinese DIRCM should be better than the Mi-28’s but that isn’t the case, so it means that the Mi-28’s is more artificially buffed
he said mi28s were only seen/used with 4 missiles , going by the same seen/used logic only 1 was used irl.
Not really, because we know for sure JAGM can go on every one of those 4 quad racks
I never had a problem. Ngl I would take the F-15E over a lot of other fighters I own, except the Su-30SM, merely due to its ability to turn on a dime and IRST.
The F-15E can still catch that though, an launch an aim-9m if he’s playing stealthy like.
Aim-120s aren’t bad either, I had good performance with them, I haven’t used the aim-120cs though.
Agreed, against other similar fox 3 they aren’t bad, but they’re severely underperforming and blown out the water by R-77-1 and MICA-EM
AIM-120C is way worse at close range but a bit better farther out ingame, when it should be a straight upgrade because there is no way USAF is going to accept a sidegrade like that
1 Like
I swear to god at this point i dont know if my english is bad, your english comprehension is bad or russia players are just generally incapable of understanding a very basic argument.
What is so complicated about this statement? You count how many tech trees are represented in the examples on the left of the “-” then you count the amount on the right and then you notice a pattern. Its really not that hard to understand yet you people completely miss the point and instead nitpick the examples themselves instead of the purpose they serve.