Thx !
That’s the only real problem in there.
1 Like
So thats your entire takeaway from my comment?
Yes ?
Bias remains to be unseen.
2 Likes
perfect then i can at least be sure that every discussion with you is an utter waste of time and effort.
2 Likes
fictional missile is much worse than extending lock range for a seeker to compensate for no LOAL like it was made for
not really, just randomly adding missiles to a plane that already had a lot vs adding a proposed aircraft (and nerfing it so it wasnt the best plane in the game when added)
more erroneous on MI28 because both the US and chinese ones IRL have more turrets and better angles
forgetting about the massive a historic nerf to all aim120 fin AOA which russia is the only tech tree not effected
also forgetting that they doubled the number of LMURs on the MI28 compared to what every source shows it as being able to use
Friend, this shouldn’t be a static value but dependent on circumstance. 5 sec with ammo door 24 7 open and stationary first few shots i can liv| with. But not 5sec robot on nuke battery
Look i remember even reading one of those reload videos on yt commentaries. The tanker said how they only fire and reload stationary and how the fatigue builds up after 5-8 reloads.
Its a big immersion and balance problem with huge Schwarzenegger reloaders. Machine spirit
Hammer with a 13km lock range seeker is fictional.
Japan never had that F-16 so it’s entirely fictional.
3 Likes
Just like trying to prove bias.
2 Likes
it was buffed to compensate for not having its 70km LOAL range
maybe you should learn to actually read
My dude, youre missing the point of my comment. I was not trying to find similar examples. I was trying to show that to find counterexamples for russian bias you need to pull examples from multiple other trees which is the aformentioned bias.
yes, and my point was even when you find those counter examples, they are significantly less compelling examples than the russian ones
POINT lock exists for a reason.
Something being proposed doesn’t warrant anything.
yeah that is the second part but such direct comparison often ends in purely subjective opinions. I wanted to stay as objective as possible to avoid precisely the discussion youre having with Motorola rn
Can we not do this discussion again?
which one again?
T58 probably
1 Like
Cool that posts get removed here, no reason whatsoever.
2 Likes
The reason was probably the completely unnecessary Stinger/Igla discussion
This entire thread is unnecessary (as so many others like it) since there is a general Bias thread: [Discussion] Balance, Bias, Matchmaking and Battle Ratings - #1406 by zweigelt83
But for some reason creating a new Russian bias thread every other day is fine.
5 Likes