i love how the russian auto loader work as spall liner direct hitedd the ammo and only yelow… but nato spall liner spalling gg…
2 Likes
that is nice, though I must say, I do extremely well with the mk3 compared to how I thought I would.
Think its because its 11.3?
The uhm auto loaders on the leclerc and type 90s do the exact same thing dude
My man, realistic Abrams would reload faster than it does now. In fact, realistic reload would be a massive buff for NATO. Tanks like the M60 would go from 7 seconds reload to ~3 seconds ace. Same for all Leopard 2 and 1 with ~3 seconds reload ace.
The only autoloaders that are reliably faster than humans in the real world are the bustle rack autoloaders found on JP tanks and the Leclerc. Or the fastdraw prototype system on the Abrams. Other than that, you really need to get into big caliber like 140mm for the inferior carousel autoloader design to outspeed a human.
1 Like
As I said previously, fix the gap. Instead of 5.0 secs, make it 5.5 secs, it makes it a much more fair field. And that’s still being in favor of the US. If I was to say make it any higher than 6.25 secs, then it would be more factual based on average reload time is roughly 6.25~ secs.
But if the M1s got a 5.5 sec, and the T-80s were corrected to 6.0 secs, then the only issue would be things like the Type 90, which would likely see an increase in br.
Talk about yourself more. People don’t agree with your falsehoods
Wearing absolutely no gear, he was able to pull off (his first reload was the only true one) in 5.0 secs. Now add all the gear, helmet, Kevlar, etc. it slows down.
Before you say “but his other reloads were quicker” yes they were. But he knew the tank was going to fire, and he left the blast door open. He’s not feeling the shock of the cannon, or any internal vibration from it firing. It’s a training simulation, and not a true to life one.
Dog, the auto loader was in game a full year before the turret baskets, talk about double standards.
Spall is determined by the residual penetration.
Firing M774 from that angle will make it go through a decent amount of armor.
1 Like
Since when France isn’t in NATO ?
Super wrong, soviets were completed with it in the 1960s, nice job looking up a loaded question.
It’s about 0.28 secs per shell pass over, nor does gaijin model that, where the shells are staggered. As I stated previously
It’s not like the other side is doing well. Abrams and Leo’s have been lost in very high numbers, drones suck for all sides.
Seems like you don’t actually know. You’re just assuming. You know what they say about assuming right?
Looks like a spec of spall hit ammo, not your shell, hard to tell at this angle. I can say for certain, using any shell against Russian ammo is an instant kill shot
Guess to reiterate the root of why alot of people hate the turret basket.
Any hit to it 7/10 times disables your ability to defend yourself. (Hitting engine and basket together usually) Along with its ability to produce spall, taking out your gunner and commander.
The auto loader disables your ability to reload, but does give you the ability to defend yourself if you haven’t fired. terrible if your in a fire fight with multiple enemies (Shooting one after another), but great if your traveling between positions. (Also consuming spall, leading to any non one shots to do only damage to the auto loader.
We know the t series is more susceptible to being one shot, and being a generally worse performing tank overall compared to the other nato tanks.
On the other side though
Nato Tanks (Specifically abrams) with the turret basket tend to “Suffer” (Mentally) A bit more as its still usually a death sentence whether you survive the first hit. (And the feeling of knowing you cant do anything kinda promotes the feeling that nato tanks are worse then t series)
(I just hit the t72B and working on the t80 rn. Definitely died more to one shots, But definitely killed more when not one shot)
1 Like
Cause lot of us are at the point where playing nothing but top BRs makes us progress in our tech trees.
wach closely a lott spall hitted the ammo and eated it only yelow afther the ammo has passed with 0 damage but in nato mbts the spall liner afther is penetraste is spalling gaijin logic… " Community Bug Reporting System "
or russian tanks barrel cliping in hull not problem" russian mains no report this issue … to ad +1-2 grane to - depression " Community Bug Reporting System "
this is fk true… only leopards and abrams have turret basket:D
Gaijin double standards:
Someone is upset that I mimicked the previous meme, writing it off as “off-topic” when it is very on topic.
1 Like
- The auto loader doesn’t eat spall, it does produce spall.
- The gun is typically knocked out along with the loader.
- Driver, loader, engine hits are very common in t series, or rather drive, then ammo and your dead.
1 Like
“Super wrong, soviets were completed with it in the 1960s, nice job looking up a loaded question.”
Try reading a history book - preferably one not penned in the USSR…
For the record: The Soviets were late to the party with ERA like they were with Composites. Regen steering. Thermals. EO Fire control systems. Hell, they were using a clapped out variant of the T-34 V-2 diesel engine until recently - in fact it’s worse - they STILL do. We’re talking about a technology base about a full generation behind that of the Chinese and the West in almost every military technology.
They can’t even work out how NERA works to this day (see Gaijin’s inability to model it correctly).