Oh no, rusians lie in their documents? Oh, that one never happened before, ah shucks!
not like lying, but rather just wrong
but yeah, that’s basic
The rusian propaganda/military overestimation/assesment etc. Works on a simple principle of every hardcore authocracy.
BS by a thousand farts. A little overestimation here, a little missed detail there - repeat 500 times and you’ll get yourself an “analogueless” weapon of complete domination wherever you seek to dominate whatever you seek to dominate. Kinda how genie wishes work you know. A fast, tank with a powerful cannon and armor that your enemies doesn’t have, but it dies if a fly sneezes nearby, frying all the crew in the process. A fast firing, cheap autocannon with powerful round, but it never hits the target. A heavily armored helicopter with all the modern systems and sensors, but it can’t sense ATGMs and stingers.
You see what I’m saying.
1 Like
Refer to my answer here, the technical document is correct from a mechanical standpoint.
100% the cycle goes
Russia is strong best army best hardware 1
Russian kit is used in a war and found be poor 2
Russians convince everyone, it’s export versions vehicles it’s poor deployment it’s using them incorrectly and Russian equipment is infact the best 3
RUSFED announce new super models T-14, Su-75 and S-500. 4
NATO analysts believe that Russian super weapons are a threat and we need to take Russia seriously! 5
Return to step. 1
In every conflict that has involved Russian hardware and NATO/Western hardware Russian hardware has lost decisively.
The fact we have people who believe the T-72B3 is a superior tank to a CR2 when Russia have lost 1000s of them.
6 Likes
theyre right, superior single-use rocket
3 Likes
‘That’s not an ammo explosion - lemme show you what a REAL ammunition explosion looks like!’
T-72 designer, probably.
1 Like
I mean mediocre armor, mediocre gun handling, mediocre firepower, mediocre mobility.
I don’t see anything good about it besides it having an APS.
Honestly afther they changed the reload from 6.7 seconds aced to 6 seconds aced and especially after they changed the reload again to 5 seconds ace the Merkava Mk.4s have become quite fun.
Only sad part is their fun strengths keep getting nerfed.
True, but an abrams with 7 seconds reload would have one of the worst firepowers of any NATO MBT while being average at everything else.
IT has good mobility man, arguably better than arbams bar in reverse, which is 17 rather than 36?
The armour is also quite nice , the issue is the surviveability of the damn LFP leaves it open if you over extend.
The Chinese round ain’t that great at all yeah.
Mines are still 6.3 I think, one is expert other is just a level 100 crew.
Looking forward to the MK4 tbh, as well as getting the raam sagol.
Yeah ; but for it to have a 7 second reload others would also need a reduction. So leos 6.5 for example, etc etc
2 Likes
Btw this means rate of fire with target acquisition and observation included. Not the mechanical value in sterile conditions like abrams tankers)
Kind of self defeating argument for you)
1 Like
Wait until you find out how they measure NATO rates of fire for documentation.
1 Like
Yeah the Mk.3s also got buffed from 6.7 aced to 6 seconds aced, which was much needed.
6.7 ace reload at 11.3-12.0 was just pure pain though back then.
1 Like
Top tier is indeed broken,dying at airfield to the SPAA shouldnt be a thing. But it is,i died to CLAWS.
1 Like
it did not, the idea was tested during WW2 by Australians
there are no pics other than the one that shows a clearly mockup missile on the airframe, and as such the image does not confirm anything
ah yes, the matte black painted seeker is obviously a real missile
every russian IIR seeker we have seen has a reflective cover over the seeker, which is very obviously missing here and replaced by matte black paint, hence the seeker is very obviously fake
eh, thats what they used for the M1128 despite lots of evidence that it isnt the autoloader speed, so I dont see why they shouldnt use that for russian tanks too
what other seeker heads are you talking abt ?
images of LMUR, the other kh-38MT mockups etc.
all of them have reflective glass over the seeker