to be honest, all tank who use human reload should get a bar of fatigue where if you shoot 4 round it would increase reload by 15% and a other 30% after 8 round, until 10 round are shoot and it become a 9 sec reload. same with auto reload, need to take a lot of time to change from apfsds to heat or he, but also manual reload of t series. and also the round is in the canon then someone shoot autoloader but i cant fire is annoying
not how it works
without actual title page the “primary source” is worthless because there is no proof that it isnt edited or fake
so your source actualy is a blog post full of errors (I saw multiple in less than a minute of looking)
it depends on the tank, but on modern ones it should be more than 4
the position of the ready rack compared to the breach makes loading much less tiring than people think because its more of a process of controlling how the round falls than carrying it
also if they do this they should increase the loading speed of manual loaders, particularly for expert and ace crews because the current reload rates do not match IRL on many tanks
yeah i just gave a exemple, its okay if they keep it that way, i am just asking for manual reload of the t series, i found this that shows only the t72 and t90 autoloader but i dont know about the t80 one
tbf the one which would work with the autoloader broken probably would take almost as long as fixing the autoloader in game takes
and might not be possible with in game ammo loads because people normally dont have any ammo outside of the carousel
are you blind? because that was not in the bug report that you posted
Your correct they don’t match irl reloads, in game the manual loaded tanks load faster than the irl tank they portray.
If we are going that far, there’s a lot of other variables to consider, but rather than make annoying mechanics, they could just give things like the abrams a 5.5 sec load time aced, the T-80Us their 6.0 sec load time, then everyone is happy.
what are you on?
abrams expert crew should be around 5 seconds and ace even faster
also T80 will not be able to reload a second APFSDS that quickly because they can not be loaded next to each other
You are correct, apparently the title page didn’t upload, not sure why. But I just saw a bunch of other similar posts that all get labeled “not a bug” but have the same info. You cannot tell me gaijin is not artificially nerfing Russian vehicles
it would take around 9-12 sec and fixing it take at least 20 sec, but its depend of the crew points and ace/repair
Go look at previous videos I posted, all randomly picked. None go faster than 6.06 secs
SUPER INCORRECT. T-80BVM is the only one that has that issue, when only using 3BM60
In game right now, I believe with an expert crew it’s 32 secs to repair the autoloader.
you mean giving Mi28 twice as many LMURs as there is evidence that it can carry is an artificial nerf?
or how about its single DIRCM turret on the bottom of the airframe being able to dazzle multiple missiles above it?
or what about any plane in game getting KH-38MT despite no evidence any of them can carry it or it existing?
or maybe the current implementation of ERA that heavily benefits russian and chinese tanks?
3 Likes
and ive seen videos for sub 4 second, and given ace crew is supposed to represent the best possible crew it should get a reload closer to that number than average
You literally have provided no evidence to those claims.
Care to explain why the soviets aren’t the First Nation with ERA in warthunder? Despite inventing it, and being the first to deploy it?
Post said video then. Once again, you have provided 0 evidence
you guys are arguring about the wrong thing, russia is suffering a lot in light tanks missing / 12.7 with r60m against f18a / f18 spam in sim / fighter missing from 10.0 to 12.7 / APC missing
There’s a lot of BTRs they could add. Simple stabilized BTR-80s
Or the BMP-2M turret’d BTR-80
Etc
wtf are you on, all of those are simple facts and unless you have counter sources, show an insane amount of favoritism to certain vehicles
its pretty simple, they didnt, it was proposed and tested during WW2 by Australians