Turret baskets disagree though. What was the time between the Abrams/Leopard turret baskets and the T-series? around 7 months?
That’s not pulled from backside. Kh38mt would be pulled from backside for example. Experimental and under br‘ed is something else
T series still dont have them
their drive damage models didnt really change much and are still tiny and hard to break
p sure autoloaders were modelled prior to turret baskets but that’s still an absolutely insane take for anything other than the Tu-4
1 Like
2 Likes
Yeah autoloaders were modeled because they had barely any downsides before that compared to manual loaders.
Iirc this was also still the time before Gaijin’s “oh this vehicle has poor performance? Here have a 5 second reload” spree, but I could be wrong about this part.
I rest my case against the LMUR then, the other 2 though are as close to fictional as possible
1 Like
Other 2… seekerheads might exist, but no official records they’re actually trialed. Gotta love gajin Russian fiction slop amirite
Pretty much all but the 9m317MA has been known to exist, KH-38MT has seen extremely little use in a current conflict, but yeah LMUR has been rather abundant
9m317a is know to exist, not ma. Compelete different missile
I think it’s probably been trialed but not in service
I did make a bug report. I’ll link it for you.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/N3mqCADyDKuZ
It was closed almost instantly. Seems like even though the documents are true, gaijin won’t give the MZ loader its true reload speed.
Sounds like a double standard eh?
1 Like
Longer than that, pretty sure the T series auto loader was modeled a full year before turret baskets came about
1 Like
For KH-38MT news sources in Ukraine we’re confirming its use, again, was very limited use though.
1 Like
lmao, you found sources so bad they didnt even work to buff a t80
it is not
38ML is but 38MT absolutely does not
2 Likes
I forgot how bad the br gap is for the Tu-4 vs the B-29 I can understand a 0.3 br difference. 1.0 br difference is a bit much.
Primary source on a 3rd party website is bad now? When on several sites it confirms the same data?
I’ll remember when you next poor argument comes up.
Gaijin won’t buff it because it will start another fire storm of “Russian bias” claims, because USA mains are bad at the game
1 Like
how
one has 12.7mm machine guns
the other has 23mm cannons
they both suck currently but the difference absolutely makes sense
Look it up bud. Ground news even had it
Not a 1.0 difference. That’s too much.
They share all the same characteristics bar the defense machine guns.
That’s why the TU-4 should be 7.3 and the B29 7.0