Yeah so its absolutely fine for the current meta? Thats like saying the F15E is actually better than the Rafale, because the F15E wins a high altitude 1v1
Again Russia players are not automatically better than other nations. As for why the british perform so much better, no idea the only theory i have is that the UK gets paired with France a lot and thats why they do better
“tech tree” being a common colloquialism for two vehicles
sure
whatever you say bud
No “tech tree” being an in game description for nation. Read the comments or let your keyboard rest.
Yeah it is fine for the current meta, just because the EFT is the better plane doesn’t instantly make the Su-30SM bad.
nation for two vehicles isn’t any less contrived
Do you have anything worthwhile to say or are you going to keep tripping over what words i used? Everyone besides you understood what was meant
I would argue that they are under preforming even worse in terms of fin AOA
But the current meta defines whats good. A good plane in a vacuum is useless compared to a good plane in the game
We all know what you meant and we all see the back-pedalling.
Since no one else complained and im not back pedalling but explaining the context to you id say youre the only one who wasnt capable of understanding what i meant
Dont worry, next time ill write a 3 line paragraph exactly detailing what i mean so the elementary school reading comprehension people can understand everything at first sight
In my opinion, simply improving the AIM-120 seekers would already be an excellent start. I was 5 km away in an F/A-18C against a Su-34 flying away from me i launched an AIM-120B, and after just two chaffs it completely lost track. It’s ridiculous when you think that not long ago, you could launch an AIM-120A from an F-16 at 40 km and still hit some unaware targets.
All I want is for my Swedish Tech Tree to finally have an SPAA that has more range than 12 km and Yes Im aware we have the EldE 98 but to be fair, its effective range is 6 km
Agreed
it is inaccurate though, its missing its fragmentation lining, and the blast frag effect that it should have
there should be absolutely no situation where a soft skinned vehicle survives a direct hit from it while it happens all the time in game
Theres no point telling me anything, glad to know and listened to what you have to say, respectfully i do not care until you bug report it and what the mods have to say for it. Until then its really not my issue.
Source it and bug report it, i will accept your stance in any circumstance if the mods accept it too, unless you were rejected from the bug report falsely, but other than that. Im going to ignore on how it should be implemented
LMAO, dont believe in reality and only what gaijan says is true
the reason they changed to this warhead for the AGM-114R was a significant increase in effect on soft targets such as AAs and soft skinned vehicles while in game it is significantly worse
as such it is factually inaccurate and significantly under preforming
Z10 is in the same place (by your stat criteria… if there is such thing) My goal post stay the same… your standarts are floating all over the place, when it suits you.
Do we have test, similar to those done in Sweden in the 90’s, with A3/A4 vs Relict? If not everything else is wishfullthinking/gueswork and marketing (from bouth sides, don’t get me wrong… every arms manufacturer will praise his weapont to be superior, no doubt about it). But telling with certainty that all those anti-era tips work against the new versions of ERA is just wrong.
If they do… make a bug report and ask to add them. I’m not against it.
Having played a lot of top tier nations, I can confidently say that it’s decently balanced bar reloads, and only Italy suffers.
Just like how the abrams reload is magically faster than it should be? Or how USA tanks that are auto loaded get correct loads but Soviet and other don’t?
Favoritism much??
Pretty ironic