My god. Your initial comment was about the 64e, no mention of the z10 whatsoever so yeah your goalposts moved.
My standards are consistent. Your reading comprehension isnt
you need skill :)
Once again to remind how funny this thread is,
“Russian teams steamrolling nato teams” meanwhile russia teams getting paired with nato teams is literally part of the game. Lol
1 Like
Wait so the Abram’s 5 second reload isnt accurate?
If only Gaijin decided to actually fix tanks that aren’t doing well, instead of just going “oh this tank isn’t doing well statistically, here have a 5 second reload” everywhere.
2 Likes
Maybe, because most USA autoloaders are autoloaders that move with the elevation angle of the breach because they are oscillating turrets.
Most Russian autoloaders (if not all) don’t move with the elevation and in real life would need their barrel set an exact angle, this movement id calculated in the reload of the tank because of the lack of this feature in Warthunder
3 Likes
…Would you like to back that one up before I point out the absolutely bottomless supply of evidence showing sub-5 by-procedure reloads, or after?
4 Likes
It’s not accurate. It can be 5 sec but eith many IFs irl. Otherwise it’s 5s autoloader
How come
Pull, big warhead
1 Like
Because they’re the second best arh missile close range
1 Like
no, if anything its slower than it should, there are mountains of evidence for abrams to have 3-4s reloads for at least a few shots
you mean like how the M1128 striker has engagement time used for reload despite every source stating it has a faster reload than in game?
2 Likes
Technically it is slower in game than IRL.
1 Like
Is Relic somehow not “3rd gen” ERA? Or am I missing a step somewhere?
Kontact-1 > Kontact-5 > Relikt > Monolith/Malachit
I’ve provided a source that claims success against 3rd Gen ERA.
I don’t mind it not going though at longer ranges(2km+), but at ~800 meters or so it really shouldn’t be having issues, let alone at Point Blank.
And we know that the US has been provided captured T-90s
It is known that M829A3 revised the tip’s design, and increased the Stiffness of the penetrator’s main body in comparison to A2.
And yet it would be another in the long line of reports that Gaijin just sit on and do nothing about.
They could also have spent the effort used to model Turret Baskets for the M1, effectively and fix other modeling issues. but no even though there are numerous acknowledged reports, none of them have been touched.
5 Likes
Gaijins own interview with an Abrams crew member says faster than 5 LMAO
So unless you have an Aced, full leadership and loader crew skill, you don’t even have a combat qualified loader, on a 105mm Abrams
Regarding M829a4 Northrop Grumman came out back in 2024, stating M829A4 was designed to defeat 3rd gen reactive armor.
Sure buddy… with you it’s allways someone else’s “reading comprehension” or “follow the discussion”… just take the L as @llSolitairell-psn told you and be done. At this point you’re turning in to a meme.
2 Likes
the captured T-90A that was spoted in Texas, dont use Relict.
Claims are good, but do they have any actual test data?
Russians claimed that Arena M APS can deffeat top-attack munitions, but nobody beleaved them until couple of weeks then they put up a video testing it againts Javelin.
Fair… but against what? K5? If that so, OK… everything else is just speculation, this is my point.
Yeah, absolutly agree… but unfortunetly fixing bugs is not profitable like adding new (premium) stuff.
1 Like
Wouldn’t happen to know where to find this video?
It’s not the original video, but one from RedEffect’s chanel