What lobbies are you playing?
Yeah man, you can double tap with the Agm-179.
People keep saying the warhead is inaccurate too. But its not lol, a bug report went up a while ago, and got denied because another user in the comments proved that the implementation is accurate of the 179’s warhead Kg.
The bug reporter Moderator didnt even say anything and just pointed to the USER’s comment
2 Likes
Na server top tier 11.3 isreal, 11.7 japan, 12.0 germany?
Ive managed to survive a few LMUR hits as well tbh usually folks send two just to make sure.
Good practice and all that
Yet it’ll be Gaijins faults again somehow
1 Like
Hey i’m in those same lobbies, this is cope
If you consolidated all the Leo2A7s as one, and then the leo2A6s as a second.
I think those 2 as categories and abram Sepv1/2 are way better, also spread out across multiple nations than any russian tank as well lmao.
1 Like
Your experience vs his, i rather take his word for it.
1 Like
The K/D of the AH64E also support those claims…
1 Like
@An_Pigeon
If theyre so bad then why do the T80 and 90 have the second and third best KD of all major 3 12.0 tanks?
No it doesnt. The 64Es stats include only post update games while the MI28 also has pre update…
Possibly because they watch this guy lol thats why they cant see anything else from any other pov
Z-10ME also has better K/D compared to Mi-28NM… and it’s stats are also (better) before the update…
0.04 more kills per death and 0.13 less kills per spawn with 150000 to 416000 games. Im speechless
Also nice goalpost move towards the Z10 there
Ill bet on the human factor since in June-July stats T-80/90 not in top 3.
Yes they are? The T80 is. But the precise ranks dont matter as much. Whats important is that for all the whining about how bad they are they seem to have very little problems to perform similarly to their US/German counterparts bar the 2A7
I find that the funniest aspect of the whole thing.
‘OUR TANKS ARE SOOOOOO BAD!’
‘Oh No - our Air can’t wipe out half the enemy team - it’s SOOOOO BAD!’
‘LMURS are REALLY HARD TO USE!’
I kid ye not - you could gift the average RU Main an ‘I Win’ Button and they’d still continue to argue the toss with everyone on the forums as to how hard-up they are. With the current Kh-38/LMUR combo making an utter mess of top-tier the best they can come up with is something along the lines of mumbles reverse speed.
Well that doesn’t give answer the June stats when something interesting appeared in US tech tree and T-80/90 stats dropped
Im top of the team most my games now, brought my kd in under a year from 0.65 up to a 1.0 mate.
There isn’t any cope just experience of thousands of games.
Not seen its KD also are you using stat shark cause almost all 3rd party sites aren’t that relevant/ useful.
Seeing as the Mi28 has had a better KD from before said missiles were introduced.
As well as this, i said in my experience, which signifies this is not a statistically backed point, just a talking point of ancedotal evidence.
Sheer volume of the vehicles being used tends to artificially inflate numbers.
Combined with recent additions for russia current KD is influenced by folks heading there to grind.
As well as this, how do they have the 2nd and 3rd place when last i looked the Leclerc, 2a7, 2a7HU, and strv122 were all higher?.
Yup when something new / interesting drops.people flock over to get it. Then go back to what they enjoy more.
Russian tanks are solid middle field, nobody says they are bad, with exceptions of course, which you find in most tech trees.
Nobody ever said that, you are making things up just for the sake of it.
Yes it does? June was the new SPAA update obviously this tanks the performance of countries that heaviliy relied on CAS supremacy
So it’s clearly shows tank performance without heavy CAS influence ? Youre not disproving me