Jokes on you, i vastly prefer standard R77s over amraams
1 Like
R77 is dogwater to use, theyre extremely limited in the effective range leaving you short armed in long range engagements.
R77-1 sort of remedies this from what ive seen mentioned.
R-Darter has entered the chat.
“Someone mentioned dogwater Fox-3s?”
Again as any experienced player will tell you like @_Renzo it’s due to the US being on both teams, specifically for the longest time.
Once the F14 dropped there was almost always USA on both teams.
In comparison not as diverse.
They have one good mbt at.top tier in the BVM while several subpar T72 model variants.
They have no top tier light bar if you take the sprut or the bmp2m which aren’t exactly great in comparisson to stuff such as the HSTVL.
In my hundreds of games with them, id say they’re extemely lack luster, between gun laying speeds, mobility issues as well as pathetic survivability they aren’t good.
Ah yes, whataboutism of R-Darter neglects R77 beeing dogwater.
1 Like
R darter on the grip ive done fine with tbh , better than my 29smt
Which Is crazy, because apart from 27sm and 30sm, every other russian plane at top tier Is worse than their american counterpart
You have about as much experience using both as my Labrador. E.g. None.
You might want to have a little think about pontificating about things if you’ve had zero experience at top tier, using the very weapons we’re arguing over.
Lmao what ? You might want to clear your eyes and check that again.
1 Like
My mistake and I retract the above comment. Wrong Ghost of TelAviv…
If there was any chance of it not being sufficient do you not believe there would have been a crash program to develop a solution?
There was less than 5 years between M829A2 and -A3.
M829A4 is still rolling out and there is no evidence that even considers the existence of M829E5.
and besides
Doesn’t seem like Relict is considered an issue. -A3’s IOC milestone was reached in 2003, Relict entered service ~2006, -A4 turns up in 2014, its introduction wasn’t rushed.
So, doesn’t mean they don’t have sensors, Kinematic ranging and Kalman filters most certainly exist and Angle only contacts have been able to be shot at for neigh on 6 decades at this point.
Do you remember what happened with the TOW-2B? The wholesale removal of the S-13DF, Stingers being “similar” to the Igla, Su-25 surviving 21 Stingers.
I mean R darter has served me better but maybe due to being fired from a gripen.
I have the same experience.
1 Like
Gripen is the key.
I’d always rather take 6x AIM-9s than the waste of space that was the Darters on the inner pylons - simply due to the Gripen’s ability to beat up anything at shorter ranges.
They are forgiving to use for new players, but forgiving doesn’t mean good tanks.
Their skill ceiling is just way to low to be considered good.
The tow2B was not something i was actually aware of.
The stinger thing was pretty stupid.
F5C still does survive wild hits.
Or maybe you all are just coping big time and theyre not nearly as bad as you pretend they are
Yeah handheld tech tree as i said before
1 Like
Nah that would be Germany or Sweden at top tier.
Russian tanks are only forgiving in the sense that they punish nad enemies.
Yeah sweden and germany are totally handheld, because of literally one vehicle that Gaijin has done their absolute best to nerf as hard as possible.
Reserve is race cars with autocannons, the bulk of the tech tree is high pen APHE from stock unlike US, their captured premiums all work better by not having to face said ammunition and Leopards have never not been excellent vehicles
Germany Ground is as handheld as it gets
1 Like