0.04 more kills per death and 0.13 less kills per spawn with 150000 to 416000 games. Im speechless
Also nice goalpost move towards the Z10 there
Ill bet on the human factor since in June-July stats T-80/90 not in top 3.
Yes they are? The T80 is. But the precise ranks dont matter as much. Whats important is that for all the whining about how bad they are they seem to have very little problems to perform similarly to their US/German counterparts bar the 2A7
I find that the funniest aspect of the whole thing.
‘OUR TANKS ARE SOOOOOO BAD!’
‘Oh No - our Air can’t wipe out half the enemy team - it’s SOOOOO BAD!’
‘LMURS are REALLY HARD TO USE!’
I kid ye not - you could gift the average RU Main an ‘I Win’ Button and they’d still continue to argue the toss with everyone on the forums as to how hard-up they are. With the current Kh-38/LMUR combo making an utter mess of top-tier the best they can come up with is something along the lines of mumbles reverse speed.
Well that doesn’t give answer the June stats when something interesting appeared in US tech tree and T-80/90 stats dropped
Im top of the team most my games now, brought my kd in under a year from 0.65 up to a 1.0 mate.
There isn’t any cope just experience of thousands of games.
Not seen its KD also are you using stat shark cause almost all 3rd party sites aren’t that relevant/ useful.
Seeing as the Mi28 has had a better KD from before said missiles were introduced.
As well as this, i said in my experience, which signifies this is not a statistically backed point, just a talking point of ancedotal evidence.
Sheer volume of the vehicles being used tends to artificially inflate numbers.
Combined with recent additions for russia current KD is influenced by folks heading there to grind.
As well as this, how do they have the 2nd and 3rd place when last i looked the Leclerc, 2a7, 2a7HU, and strv122 were all higher?.
Yup when something new / interesting drops.people flock over to get it. Then go back to what they enjoy more.
Russian tanks are solid middle field, nobody says they are bad, with exceptions of course, which you find in most tech trees.
Nobody ever said that, you are making things up just for the sake of it.
Yes it does? June was the new SPAA update obviously this tanks the performance of countries that heaviliy relied on CAS supremacy
So it’s clearly shows tank performance without heavy CAS influence ? Youre not disproving me
You appear to have convenient amnesia. Something of a common theme. Scroll up and look at some posters comments if you need help.
“The are games when I want to try the new LMUR on my Mi-28 end as a los or killed just after take of by a cap/ARH SAM”
“R77 standards are also dog water to use man need to use then like slightly longer range R73s.”
" against what, su27sm? With few weakened R-77s? Or Mig29smt with barely any compete-able multirole loadout"
Now, please do continue to tell the class how hard it is to play RU top tier…
Is this also available in english ?
Funny that i only see threads complaining about Russia and not the other way around.
2 Likes
An I win button, US air since the F14 onwards has largely been this.
The us ground trees extremely diverse as well as thr german one.
Acting as if RU is better is just obtuse.
The tanks are pretty gash
What? The performance dropped (marginally) because russias performance dropped in general thanks to the new SPAAs but if you believe this thread than the performance of russian tanks should be orders of magnitude worse than the Leoprards and abrams, because theyre oh so much worse. Yet the difference is not that big (the 2a7 being the exception)
You may have never heard of this, but in a simple study conducted spontaneously by some players, we found that when the Soviet or Russian win rate is low, they try to add new powerful vehicles to the existing tech tree, aiming to ensure that the top-tier Soviet win rate does not fall below 40%. However, unfortunately, this has plunged the environment into an irreversible cycle of errors. When everyone experiences Russian vehicles, they all crave sitting in aircraft and pressing the spacebar to launch missiles, making instant defeats a common occurrence. As a result, they cannot guarantee that the top-tier Russian win rate will be maintained at the level they desire, which in turn prompts them to add even more powerful weapons.
Thats it i am finaly convinced of Rusian bias, thank you for the enlightment.
I quoted the poster word for word to avoid the accusation of rearranging people’s words.
“Sorry, but No. That is gross exaggeration.
Yeah, btf, for tha last 3 days I havent played wt , but before that I played mainly US top tier ( i grind the AH-64E) and I haven’t experience any “steamrolling” from russian team… quite the opposite. The are games when I want to try the new LMUR on my Mi-28 end as a los or killed just after take of by a cap/ARH SAM”
If that causes you difficulty then that’s a you problem. =)
Then why does USSR Air top tier perform better than US Air from 12.3 upwards?
And USSR is not diverse?
They are fine
Cool, so you found a guy who is clueless, that strengthens your argument bro.
One of the rare times you felt really smart typing that i bet.
Oh look flag abuse again, guess have to involve the mods.
Look chaps! We found a live one!
Do carry on and don’t let me interrupt…