Guess i must have missed the part where Brimstones have GNSS then?
So one top attacks, has higher TnT equiv., double the range and is on a platform with LDIRCM but people with similar skill will perform similarly?
yes
Spike
JAGM
PARS
LMUR
Same…
Phew im glad you added content creators which use specifically picked matches to make entertaining videos to proof your point, because otherwise someone might think that said point is…lets say its out there.
Also nice move to take SPIKE and PARS videos that are not even from the current update with the new AGMs
3 Likes
Well you moved the point from “skill to use” to “TnT equiv” and “range” so…
How does that change the targets set SPIKE and PARS are used against and they’re effectivness???
He specifically said LMUR Mi-28 the LMUR is significantly better both in travel time, ease and consistency of locking(PARS was also good when it was first added at lock consisteny) and kill chance than the PARS (partly due to the loft of the pars being incorrectly modeled). But you also need to consider the Mi-28 is a substantially better platform than the UHT in every sense (except maybe the camera placement which i personally like more on the UHT) flight model, anti aircraft capabilities (just the mi28 30mm cannon or a pilon of Vikhrs) compared to the lackluster atas missiles which is the UHTs only defence. Then comes flight performance, a Mi-28 warms up way quicker (faster climb) and is suprisingly similarly as maneuvrable as the UHT, also lets not forget the IRCCM the mi28 gets. Ive made my point. Yes a skilled player can do well in the UHT, but a skilled player can also do well in an allouette 3 at toptier, so that kind of point imo is invalid.
2 Likes
I mean that is true for some minor nations, but nations like Sweden, Germany, Italy and the US for example take about as much skill as playing the US.
Like seriously, if someone goes negative or barely even K/D in tanks like the Leopard 2A7s, Strv 122s, Abrams and T-80s than they should seriously rethink if top tier is something for them.
I agree, there are also enough bad russian mains with absolutely braindead takes.
If I see those I’ll also point them out.
3 Likes
I did not.
If you take 2 people of similar skill and one is in a platform thats just much more capable in every regard then that person is going to perform better despite not being more skilled. Therefore one is easier to use effectively
Evaluating their effectiveness without comparison is useless.
I’m confused…
Agreed except for the k/d part. In my opinion k/d is not a good way of seing someones impact on the match, think of all the support players out there (the few of them) that will scout enemy tanks, respawn aas till the cas thats been wiping out the entire team has been eliminated , decapping points when its needed, etc. I know ive had my fair share of games where I ended up with a negative or even k/d but still made a significant impact on the match. Id rather have a good teammate playing the objective than a braindead spawncamper with a good k/d that loses us the match.
4 Likes
Mi-28 excel only in terms of LDRCM and the chin mounted 30 mm cannon… mobility the UHT is way ahead due to been lighter
Saying PARS and SPIKE are effective based on a youtube video is already questionable but the real problem is that this statement is useless without having a comparison.
If my Baseline is that HOT3 is an effective weapon then PARS and SPIKE are going to be insanely effective for me. If my baseline is that LMUR is an effective weapon then PARS and SPIKE are going to look much weaker to me. They are effective as in “they can kill tanks” but if you want to tell how effective a weapon really is you have to compare it to its competitors
Someone has to go negative, otherwise noone would play…
5 Likes
Agree that a youtube video is not a valid agrument (due to editing/selective recording ect)… or it’s as much as a screanshoot of a post-battle socre (that are currently used). Bouth are outliers.
But using a video 3-1 months old, of a PARS and SPIKE doest change how effective they’re. One can achieve same/similar results with them, copared to the new missiles. Also I compere them to the current LMUR and JAGM… not to HOT3 or Falanga…
If you had played the UHT you would know this is not the case. At high speed perhaps the UHT is more maneuvrable. But the Mi28 builds up speed and altitude way faster than the UHT. But yes the Mi28 gets into the weird left or right roll when it builds up too much speed due to its weight. Also PARS vs LMUR again…
we talked about the platforms, right?
Ofc you can but you can also achieve similar results in a Leopard 1 as in a 2A7 but theyre hardly similarly effective.
My point with HOT was that “PARS is effective” is a subjective statement that you cant really discuss. Meanwhile “PARS is more effective than HOT, because it has more range and is FnF” is an objective statement that you can actually discuss. Thats why videos from before the update are useless, because they dont offer that comparison you need to get into an objective discussion
I actually prefer beam riding or laser guided munitions nowadays with the exception of the LMUR xD. Its just more consistent for me.
1 Like
I discussed only FnF missiles… if adding HOT, Leopard 1 or 2A7 help you’r poin, fine…
How, when again I’m comparing FnF missiles… ? Did they changed anything to the SPIKE/PARS since the last update? If not… what is the problem to compare them, with videos from the last update… back then they’re ware used against the same MBTs/SAMs/light tanks… where is the problem?
Are you dense? Where do you think the ammo goes?
1 Like
Can you at least pretend that you care to understand the point im making?
You are not comparing. These videos are not comparison videos they are entertainment videos. I am comparing.The Leopard 1 and HOT examples were just meant to explain to you why comparison is important for an actual discussion.