Yes.
But it doesn’t matter what we know, but what the developers know is important. The developers don’t tell us which sources they use and that’s why we can’t make a report based on the fact that this load-out does not exist in the sources known to us. We need to provide a source where the load-out proposed by the developer will not be possible.
Whether it’s good or bad doesn’t matter, it’s just how the rules work for players.
it does look as terrible as the other US Army presentations weve seen in this thread lol
But the website that comes up in image search looks sketchy as hell
Strange that the Kamov can carry fewer, when it has a greater payload
Website is called ODIN, here is the link. As said, i don’t know it or how authentic it is, i just asked ChatGPT and let it verify it a few times and it said it is an offical US Army page…
https://odin.tradoc.army.mil/WEG/Asset/d77ab8582866066fb807f0f9a26ffba8?utm_source=chatgpt.com
I also saw it beeing used in other WT threads when i was browsing, so people seem to know it.
Yea, thats why i also was very sceptic at first lol.
Chat GPT is horrible, it’s also strange the US is using the outdated name for the missile
When Kh-39 has been widely adopted now it is out of the testing phase
Its sometimes but that website looks pretty legit. It uses the right domain and it looks similarly horrible to all the other US army stuff weve seen so far
Which Is almost a completetely different aircraft from Su27SM and Su30
You’re not.
Su27SM and Su30 can’t use double racks between engines since they physically cannot fit
how would you use LMUR’s on inboard pylon, when theres no launch interface?)
if you could mount on any 2 pylons you would mount on inboard because that offers less of an adverse affect on roll control, and less center of gravity shift when a missile is launced
I much prefer the m60a2
It’s quieter
It’s faster
It has better turret traverse
If firing HEAT the reload is rather quick, for super long range you have ATGMs.
LRF too with good a trolly armor
If is key part here
Well there’s your first mistake.
Dog, the CLAWs was able to hide on buildings, and aim-9x is pretty much a guaranteed kill…
The AH-64E has new Hellfire with IR and longer range, which also carrying more, and I’m pretty sure they are faster than LMUR.
Out of the 10 LMUR I fired at 10 km distance, I scored 1 kill. In an open Desert map, they aren’t all that op.
KA-52Ms and such can carry the LMUR too, but we don’t have an exact model of the KA-52 in game.
Dog, the LMUR has been doing much better than that. Back to back games of LMUR filling the kill feed. I think you’re downplaying a little.
Or using it at extreme ranges giving opportunities to escape it in one way or another.
The M60A2 has a 12 second ace reload for HEAT as well.
having a stabilizer + good APHE is amazing at 8.3. It used to be my consistent second spawn at 8.3 before they added the Object 140. Now that that is 8.7 the T-10M will likely become my consistent second spawn again.
NATO main tactics: pull the stat card a scream Russian main.
lol all I have been playing is USA or Italy, I have mostly stopped playing USSR due to other nations being better in every regard thanks to player complaints.
