I don’t see “guarantee kill missiles” being written on them on shows, so your point is moot.
1 Like
If you are going to have some input at least use the correct airframe.
Gaijin will add the Ka-52M probably before the end of year and players will be trying to justify it can hold 16 (maybe it can we have no proof)
However this discussion is regarding the LMUR in game and not on other platforms.
Mi-28 and so far no one even the manufatire of the helicopter, Russian sources can refute that it can carry more than 4
Ingame they are
It’s also more weight, more fuel and if you don’t anticipate the need to engage with that many targets why carry them.
You just gave yourself the answer why you don’t need 8 LMUR’s then, congratulations.
Or is it just the case for the Americans ?
2 Likes
Ok to summarize
AH64E: we know that it can carry 16 hellfires, we know that the JAGM is backwards compatible with the Hellfire launchers, we have brochures that it can carry 16 JAGMs, we do not have a picture of 16 JAGMs.
MI28: we do not have pictures of 8 LMURs, we do not know anything specific about launcher compatibility, we have brochures insinuating that i can carry only 4 (?)
Did i get that right?
3 Likes
Not at all, you are trying to justify why US helicopters havent got 16 missiles loaded up
During the Gulf some carried 16 Hellfires for attacks on SAMs etc, but the majority carried fewer for greater mission flexibility.
Guess what the manual says can carry 16 Hellfires
Not what the Mi-28 load sheet says regarding LMURS. Gaijin have allowed this for “balance” something they throw around when they dont want Russia to fall behind.
I’m talking about JAGMs on an air show. Please follow.
2 LMURs are lighter than 6 Vikhrs.
That’s why they kept RU without FnF for years, definitely not fallen behind.
1 Like
If ChatGPT is to believed, this is an official US Army training website, which i don’t know is true or not.
Yes.
But it doesn’t matter what we know, but what the developers know is important. The developers don’t tell us which sources they use and that’s why we can’t make a report based on the fact that this load-out does not exist in the sources known to us. We need to provide a source where the load-out proposed by the developer will not be possible.
Whether it’s good or bad doesn’t matter, it’s just how the rules work for players.
it does look as terrible as the other US Army presentations weve seen in this thread lol
But the website that comes up in image search looks sketchy as hell
Strange that the Kamov can carry fewer, when it has a greater payload
Website is called ODIN, here is the link. As said, i don’t know it or how authentic it is, i just asked ChatGPT and let it verify it a few times and it said it is an offical US Army page…
https://odin.tradoc.army.mil/WEG/Asset/d77ab8582866066fb807f0f9a26ffba8?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Looks like ChatGPT didnt disappoint this time
But holy moly, youd think the US would find some room for a couple professional graphic designers in their 890 billion dollar budget. That stuff looks horrid
I also saw it beeing used in other WT threads when i was browsing, so people seem to know it.
Yea, thats why i also was very sceptic at first lol.
Chat GPT is horrible, it’s also strange the US is using the outdated name for the missile
When Kh-39 has been widely adopted now it is out of the testing phase
Its sometimes but that website looks pretty legit. It uses the right domain and it looks similarly horrible to all the other US army stuff weve seen so far
