That’s a laser one
nah, people are saying that that is a lens at the bottom and the thing on top is a bearing
to me it just looks like they through together something that looks electronic and called it good enough
It being mentioned in a 2024 brochure definitely means the program exists.
Your eyes are deceiving you.
The compensation with the LOAL mechanic is realistic.
If half your crew is dead, that’s quite conditional
We went over this for far too long, i’ll let you spin around on the issue alone if you will
Yes they do
It’s basically some obscure principle invented by the devs at this point, and on no missile would you advertise an average load. A customer doesn’t care about such technical details
going full WoT is indeed an issue, let’s go realistic
KH38 removed
AASM seeker fixed to 1.5km with LOAL
If it doesn’t sound good to you, sorry not sorry, that’s how it goes in our physical world.
it does not at all, it confirms that kh38me is a program but there is nothing to prove that a MTE version has ever been in development
no they do not, gaijin just ignores them because they dont fit with there NATO cant make anything better than russia logic
1 Like
This is Kh-38ME, with laser seeker
the same as on many photos from MAKS
Do you have proof that AGM-65D is compatible with AGM-65E and B pylons?
I do, and they’re older signaling compared to Kh-38s.
There is no proof outside not having a thermal compatible display in the cockpit for thermal viewing, that you cannot use an AGM-65D missile on an AGM-65B era aircraft.
It hasn’t been tried, but electrically there is nothing stopping you.
It’s the same way that AIM-9B aircraft didn’t have to be upgraded to use AIM-9Js. 9Ls are a different story cause they changed coolant standards too much.
Su-35 has Kh-38s.
Su-30SM is allegedly at or above Su-35 standards for the avionics system with no proof to counter the manufacturer’s claim.
So even if Su-30SM was proven incorrect, Su-35 would still have Kh-38MTs when added.
Mind you Kh-38MTs haven’t been the meta in months. They’re still okay to decent, just not meta.
I also have proof that 16 JAGMs are compatible on 64E, because the signalling is similar to AGM-114 which the manufacturer has proved.
The laser one has a grid, uses a different translucent head, and isn’t angled downward.
idk thats what all the people who were ignoring all evidence and claiming 38mt exists were saying
1 Like
AGMs don’t have LOAL modelled, so they all suffer from that.
My point still stands.
And when the condition is met your performance drops off of a cliff, as taking 20-30s to reload isn’t something you’d want to have.
Glad we can agree IR Hammer in the game is a work of fiction, and a proven one at that.
Not the same angle. Try again.
Nor do Gaijin cares what you think manufacturers would or would not advertise.
It’s literally your guesstimation against theirs.
We have proof AASM has fictional seeker, unlike for 38MT.
Once you find a proof we can talk, so until then IR Hammer is the true work of fiction here.
doesnt matter by gaijins standards
They are being used in VKS on Su-34 in current war, so why would they remove something which is in service(I’m talking about Kh-38ML). Kh-38ML/MT should be removed from Su-25SM3 and Su-30SM. And MT from entire game
2 Likes
Read the full post.
Sukhoi AND Kh-38’s manufacturer both claim that Kh-38s are compatible with both Su-35 and Su-30SM.
Those Smin posts are entirely irrelevant to this topic and my posts as they address something entirely different.
I’d love to see an Su-30SM manual, but they are classified so that won’t be happening.
And much like France, Russia doesn’t equip full loadouts to their jets to show off loadouts.
MTE is directly being mentioned in the brochure.
Yes they do, it’s actually sad how some can’t see with their fully functioning eyes (I hope).
Your logic is also immensely flawed as we already have NATO stuff that is better than RU in the game.
If your logic was so sound as you think it is, DM53 wouldn’t be performing better than 3BM60 and many other cases being true as well. Try different arguments, this is honestly embarrassing to read.
That definitely isn’t a laser seeker.
they are relevant because they dont specify which sub variants of su35 or su30sm
as such they dont mean anything
that was exactly the reasoning behind stingers being artificially nerfed though, they said that because igla cant do that stinger cant either and we will ignore all evidence that it can
They made that statement as there was no concrete evidence that the specified G load is maximum or average.
look at the components inside the seeker.
No it’s not, even Su-30SM2 doesn’t have full avionics from Su-35S.
No it shouldn’t. Russian MoD and observers posted only photos with mockup of Kh-38M family on the aircraft. In service they don’t use other A2G missile than Kh-31PM.
1 Like
lmao, no they didnt they decided to ignore sources including some that clearly state average G loading because of their biases
it’s the same missile on the same display, on the body you can see the name Х-38МЭ