idk thats what all the people who were ignoring all evidence and claiming 38mt exists were saying
1 Like
AGMs don’t have LOAL modelled, so they all suffer from that.
My point still stands.
And when the condition is met your performance drops off of a cliff, as taking 20-30s to reload isn’t something you’d want to have.
Glad we can agree IR Hammer in the game is a work of fiction, and a proven one at that.
Not the same angle. Try again.
Nor do Gaijin cares what you think manufacturers would or would not advertise.
It’s literally your guesstimation against theirs.
We have proof AASM has fictional seeker, unlike for 38MT.
Once you find a proof we can talk, so until then IR Hammer is the true work of fiction here.
doesnt matter by gaijins standards
They are being used in VKS on Su-34 in current war, so why would they remove something which is in service(I’m talking about Kh-38ML). Kh-38ML/MT should be removed from Su-25SM3 and Su-30SM. And MT from entire game
2 Likes
Read the full post.
Sukhoi AND Kh-38’s manufacturer both claim that Kh-38s are compatible with both Su-35 and Su-30SM.
Those Smin posts are entirely irrelevant to this topic and my posts as they address something entirely different.
I’d love to see an Su-30SM manual, but they are classified so that won’t be happening.
And much like France, Russia doesn’t equip full loadouts to their jets to show off loadouts.
MTE is directly being mentioned in the brochure.
Yes they do, it’s actually sad how some can’t see with their fully functioning eyes (I hope).
Your logic is also immensely flawed as we already have NATO stuff that is better than RU in the game.
If your logic was so sound as you think it is, DM53 wouldn’t be performing better than 3BM60 and many other cases being true as well. Try different arguments, this is honestly embarrassing to read.
That definitely isn’t a laser seeker.
they are relevant because they dont specify which sub variants of su35 or su30sm
as such they dont mean anything
that was exactly the reasoning behind stingers being artificially nerfed though, they said that because igla cant do that stinger cant either and we will ignore all evidence that it can
They made that statement as there was no concrete evidence that the specified G load is maximum or average.
look at the components inside the seeker.
No it’s not, even Su-30SM2 doesn’t have full avionics from Su-35S.
No it shouldn’t. Russian MoD and observers posted only photos with mockup of Kh-38M family on the aircraft. In service they don’t use other A2G missile than Kh-31PM.
1 Like
lmao, no they didnt they decided to ignore sources including some that clearly state average G loading because of their biases
it’s the same missile on the same display, on the body you can see the name Х-38МЭ
Not a single source explicitly stated the G load was average.
Present me with one and I’ll change my mind.
there is also further out images that show it has a sign for MLE infront of it
38ME being the marking for a family of modular missiles that are meant to be exported.
That isn’t the laser seeker.
heres a pretty good rundown on how stupid it is
1 Like
and there is no evidence that it is a functional IR seeker like you claim
And i might know why gaijin decided to add Kh-38M to Su-30SM, the same brochure which we all know had caption saying something about future integrations. There was Su-25, Su-30MK etc and gaijin probably thinks that if older model could or was proposed to carry them so the newer one can do the same
Also pylons for Kh-38M family are the same as those for Kh-29 missile AKU-58AE so technically Su-30SM can carry them on the same pylons as Kh-29 but we don’t know if VKS integrated missile with the aircraft. Is that logic stupid? Of course it is. Do i agree with that? Of course not.
it also doesnt matter because its not enough evidence for its addition
