only kh38 in game should be 6 kh38mls on su34
I don’t see a fully armed ready to fire missile on here, or any document stating it was test fired at least
you missed the DM73 part
I can’t find any plane named Su-35S in the russian tree… I’m probably not looking hard enough though
1 Like
yes , you have to prove they dont use them
Did i say something about integrating it with planes? No i only said the seeker is real, so don’t try to be rude
well they should have just added the su35 instead of adding the su27sm/30sm with the addition of rafale/eurofighter. but they can rename the su27sm to su27sm3 and its missile count would match with irl missile count cus it gets 2 extra pylons irl (not dual pylons but u get 2 extra r77s in both the cases).
2 Likes
bro did i write something that offends you or what? I’m only trying to have “normal” conversation
IR Hammer with 13km of lock range isn’t realistic.
I don’t know where you get that from.
No, we learned about cancellation documents in classes.
Huge blow to all manually loaded tanks, which happen to be the best ones in the game.
Not worse than a 2nd best AGM in the game that’s proven to be fictional.
Moot point as RU isn’t the only nation with DIRCM.
No they don’t.
Not a single source stated if they’re talking about average or max G load.
Everyone complained about turret baskets not going to everyone but they still went with it.
Yes it is as it makes the weapon be a complete work of fiction.
IR Hammer is yet another example of WT going full WoT mode, thanks for admitting.
that looks a lot different from the other image people claim is a 38MT
its almost like both are mockups built by two different companys
2 Likes
Ye it would be much better than current one
Present some sources, prototype rounds/missiles with brochures stating their described capabilities.
I know you can’t because those don’t exist, unlike 38MT.
Give us a picture of 16 JAGMs on 64E, I’ll wait.
1 Like
Can you sent here that picture? I’m a bit curious that photo
it has to actualy exist as a program and more than a couple of mockups looking for export customers for it to be cancelled
there have been multiple
That’s a laser one
nah, people are saying that that is a lens at the bottom and the thing on top is a bearing
to me it just looks like they through together something that looks electronic and called it good enough
It being mentioned in a 2024 brochure definitely means the program exists.
Your eyes are deceiving you.
The compensation with the LOAL mechanic is realistic.
If half your crew is dead, that’s quite conditional
We went over this for far too long, i’ll let you spin around on the issue alone if you will
Yes they do
It’s basically some obscure principle invented by the devs at this point, and on no missile would you advertise an average load. A customer doesn’t care about such technical details
going full WoT is indeed an issue, let’s go realistic
KH38 removed
AASM seeker fixed to 1.5km with LOAL
If it doesn’t sound good to you, sorry not sorry, that’s how it goes in our physical world.
it does not at all, it confirms that kh38me is a program but there is nothing to prove that a MTE version has ever been in development
no they do not, gaijin just ignores them because they dont fit with there NATO cant make anything better than russia logic
1 Like
This is Kh-38ME, with laser seeker
the same as on many photos from MAKS
Do you have proof that AGM-65D is compatible with AGM-65E and B pylons?
I do, and they’re older signaling compared to Kh-38s.
There is no proof outside not having a thermal compatible display in the cockpit for thermal viewing, that you cannot use an AGM-65D missile on an AGM-65B era aircraft.
It hasn’t been tried, but electrically there is nothing stopping you.
It’s the same way that AIM-9B aircraft didn’t have to be upgraded to use AIM-9Js. 9Ls are a different story cause they changed coolant standards too much.
Su-35 has Kh-38s.
Su-30SM is allegedly at or above Su-35 standards for the avionics system with no proof to counter the manufacturer’s claim.
So even if Su-30SM was proven incorrect, Su-35 would still have Kh-38MTs when added.
Mind you Kh-38MTs haven’t been the meta in months. They’re still okay to decent, just not meta.
I also have proof that 16 JAGMs are compatible on 64E, because the signalling is similar to AGM-114 which the manufacturer has proved.
The laser one has a grid, uses a different translucent head, and isn’t angled downward.
