Russian Teams Steamrolling NATO - Top Tier is Broken Again?

Also LMUR being somehow faster than their published stats and carrying more than officially seen carrying, top tier ground sim is literally ending in 5 mins top from half the team being wiped by LMUR’s and KH38’s. Extremely balanced when combined with magical force fields that make targeting helis only possible with SACLOS AA.

1 Like

There are photos of seeker on display, also it’s modular missile you can which seekers between each other.


The seeker on the left in Izdeliye 65MT the one from Kh-38MT

It’s export DM53 with minor changes.

They exist and VKS use them but on Su-35S, it was pointing out to gaijin with classic response “Primary source…”

hm??

double pylons for r77 is real but gaijin is too lazy to add the su-35 cus they probably think it would be too op so they gave its weapons to su30sm.

give us a picture of 6 kh38mts on a su30 please

Capture points, and limited spawn points says tanks with anti-tank guns are the primary determining factor for winning matches.

This is why people claimed Soviets had a 70% win rate, because they had no CAS during that time, and their opponents were both less skilled and spawned CAS which can’t capture points as well as being spawn point inefficient.

MBTs are THE meta in ground. 100 - 150 spawn points first spawn.
IFVs are even 100 SP while being less effective.
IR AGM CAS is hilariously expensive, especially now that 6 frags is even less likely than ever before.

Unfortunately, it’s just stupid that 2 jets which never ever used double racks get them in game

1 Like

only kh38 in game should be 6 kh38mls on su34

I don’t see a fully armed ready to fire missile on here, or any document stating it was test fired at least

you missed the DM73 part

I can’t find any plane named Su-35S in the russian tree… I’m probably not looking hard enough though

1 Like

yes , you have to prove they dont use them

Did i say something about integrating it with planes? No i only said the seeker is real, so don’t try to be rude

well they should have just added the su35 instead of adding the su27sm/30sm with the addition of rafale/eurofighter. but they can rename the su27sm to su27sm3 and its missile count would match with irl missile count cus it gets 2 extra pylons irl (not dual pylons but u get 2 extra r77s in both the cases).

2 Likes

bro did i write something that offends you or what? I’m only trying to have “normal” conversation

IR Hammer with 13km of lock range isn’t realistic.
I don’t know where you get that from.

No, we learned about cancellation documents in classes.

Huge blow to all manually loaded tanks, which happen to be the best ones in the game.

Not worse than a 2nd best AGM in the game that’s proven to be fictional.

Moot point as RU isn’t the only nation with DIRCM.

No they don’t.

Not a single source stated if they’re talking about average or max G load.

Everyone complained about turret baskets not going to everyone but they still went with it.

Yes it is as it makes the weapon be a complete work of fiction.
IR Hammer is yet another example of WT going full WoT mode, thanks for admitting.

that looks a lot different from the other image people claim is a 38MT

its almost like both are mockups built by two different companys

2 Likes

Ye it would be much better than current one

Present some sources, prototype rounds/missiles with brochures stating their described capabilities.
I know you can’t because those don’t exist, unlike 38MT.

Give us a picture of 16 JAGMs on 64E, I’ll wait.

1 Like

Can you sent here that picture? I’m a bit curious that photo

it has to actualy exist as a program and more than a couple of mockups looking for export customers for it to be cancelled

there have been multiple