it has been to all reasonable standards
with absolutely no compelling evidence that it exists and only images of two mockups
Nor should IR Hammer get any compensation for fixing it’s comically overperforming seeker.
Asking for a completely new mechanic just because one part of your missile has been nerfed (legitimately) doesn’t hold water.
Once 38MT is proven to be fake then removing it could be a possible option to ask for.
On the other hand, 1.5km lock range on the Hammer is pretty much set in stone at the moment.
Thought you were being sarcastic about that.
I think it’s really unrealistic that manually loaded tanks with two crew left can reload and turn their turrets at the same time. One guy constantly jumping from the gunner’s seat to loader’s would drastically increase the reload times as well.
One simple mechanic that would seriously cripple vast majority of western tanks found at top tier.
one easy fix would be for gaijin to remove kh38mt until they provide some sources for the missile existing
You can cry and seethe all you want, KH38 is not getting removed.
1 Like
kh38mt doesn’t exist, thanks for acknowledging that gaijin went wot mode for russian top tier
IDK at least it’s realistic unlike 38
You can’t prove something doesn’t exist. You skipped science classes ?
An impact that cripples half of western tanks when 2 crew members are sent to sleep, such wow (Let’s not forget Type 10 and Leclerc existence, as well as a potential KF-51 addition)
Meanwhile :
- A missile not proven to exist serves as best in class for CAS in a certain nation
- DIRCM and rotor return not being modelled properly serving as force fields for helicopters (and who mainly uses helis for CAS ?)
- T-series caroussel eating spall like there’s no tomorrow, and somehow not generating any when hit
- Anti ERA tip not being modelled on some top end ammunition
- the US not even having access to its last APFSDS (A3, A4), France not having Shard, Germany not having DM63 and 73 (and no, VACUUM is not yet proven to be compatible with anything other than t-14)
- The manpads article (we believe lmao)
- The spall liner addition (merely avoided being added only to russia because everyone rightfully complained)
- Relikt ERA somehow having 200mm of efficiency against kinetic round and 100 more mm against chemical rounds compared to the absolute blocks on western MBTs while being paper thin, because of course it makes sense
- LOAL ground to ground missiles not being modelled
- Western ATGM loft being too low, ending up in the turret mask or gun instead of the turret top. Coding or technical issue maybe ? Nope, LMUR can loft all right
- R-77 double racks
Shall i continue ?
2 Likes
How they even proven it exists? Bc depents on their fuckup logic it can be proven that it exist
this one is such BS because they proved that they can make them loft with LMUR but apparently they only can for russian ATGMs
3 Likes
good point indeed
1 Like
You have plethora of fakes in WT, so it’s already went WoT mode, years ago.
Ha so AASM’s lock isn’t a problem after all ?
Pick one please, or admit it’s double standard
1 Like
lets give abrams apfsds that pens 1200mm and give france agms that go mach 5 and have 200kg of tnt and then remove it only when you prove them to be fake
1 Like
give us germany france britain and italy kh38mt
Also LMUR being somehow faster than their published stats and carrying more than officially seen carrying, top tier ground sim is literally ending in 5 mins top from half the team being wiped by LMUR’s and KH38’s. Extremely balanced when combined with magical force fields that make targeting helis only possible with SACLOS AA.
1 Like
There are photos of seeker on display, also it’s modular missile you can which seekers between each other.
The seeker on the left in Izdeliye 65MT the one from Kh-38MT
It’s export DM53 with minor changes.
They exist and VKS use them but on Su-35S, it was pointing out to gaijin with classic response “Primary source…”
hm??
double pylons for r77 is real but gaijin is too lazy to add the su-35 cus they probably think it would be too op so they gave its weapons to su30sm.
give us a picture of 6 kh38mts on a su30 please
Capture points, and limited spawn points says tanks with anti-tank guns are the primary determining factor for winning matches.
This is why people claimed Soviets had a 70% win rate, because they had no CAS during that time, and their opponents were both less skilled and spawned CAS which can’t capture points as well as being spawn point inefficient.
MBTs are THE meta in ground. 100 - 150 spawn points first spawn.
IFVs are even 100 SP while being less effective.
IR AGM CAS is hilariously expensive, especially now that 6 frags is even less likely than ever before.
Unfortunately, it’s just stupid that 2 jets which never ever used double racks get them in game
1 Like