Russian Teams Steamrolling NATO - Top Tier is Broken Again?

The TD is great until someone idk… someone shoots at you and sets the bomb off at the back of the turret through the mantlet

OK thats great but try and make a small turn in the Challenger, it will slow down to a crawl after a 90 degree turn at speed - driving a T-80-UE1 around is like driving on ice, it feels as if it has no weight at all

When half the maps are flat terrained, street maps or maps with very shallow elevation changes, this doesnt mean much - it also doesnt help the CR2s can and will be one shotted through the area above the gun

1 Like

Worst ammo…get the fk out of here it’s the 3rd best shell.

More like 5th or 6th best shell.

1 Like

Comparing horse shit to cow shit isnt saying much. T90s, challies (not the BN), chinese tracked shitboxes, arietes and leclerc should not be top tier

4 Likes

Leclerc to 11.7 so it’s actually next to it’s closest relative in performance (base M1A1)

Opens up slot for Senrai tank too if you think about it.

1 Like

Seen enough, Nerf birsmark

Wow and in the Russian tank tree only 1 tank past 12.0 with turbine, the rest are premium (which also mega suck in other regards)

I also think you forget the whole point of reverse. It’s being able to go backwards without having to turn 180 with zero neutral steering (Russian tanks)

Sure, but reverse works in street maps. You can get out of impossible 1v2’s on corners.

JP, USA, GER, SWE, ISR, IT, all have better ammo lmao. Thanks to them all having the same shared platforms or modified derivative.

Even CN which is basically a copy-pasta Russia faction with reverse gear has slightly better.

3 Likes

M1A2T

1 Like


image
i just found this kinda funny.
Kh31PDs are genuinely broken, it is actually so funny that there are genuinely people that defend this. Just for clarity sake, that is a 49+km release with 3950kph which is Mach ~3.2 roughly.
So that is a stable Mach 3+ wide band anti radiation missile on every single 12.7+ flanker in the game with over 50km range and 144kg warhead.

4 Likes

there is no solution for this matter.
if we remove them. russia will not have any arms except kh58.
if we keep them, they will be busted.

1 Like

ok and?

the wide band kh58 is kinetically similar to or slightly better than HARM
there is no reason that russia needs kh31 especially given that their AA was already by far the best and most reliable at intercepting missiles including ARMs

2 Likes

Option 1 is much better than option 2 when russia already has access to Kh38s and the best SPAA in the entire game.
So the solution seems quite simple.
also “will not have any ARMs except Kh58s” as if Kh58s were terrible.
Genuinely people defending Kh31s can cry me a river for all i care. This thing is demonically busted compared to non-russian ARMs ingame.

Someone else will have to do that considering kh31 is in game right now.

1 Like

AS-17 is mostly broken because the other systems in the game are either not implemented or multiple decades older. AARGM (HARM but modern) would be quite strong, and AARGM-ER/SiAW should be even better (once it’s finished development). I don’t have info on other NATO systems but the capabilities of their modern systems are likely also as good as AS-17 or better.

image
Get CAS or lose

3 Likes

none of the thing you said was true.

it niether better or equal. it actually worse. not mentioning the platform that these missiles uses. being faster and better than the kh58 platforms.

1 Like

hmm…
yeah i think your forgeting the platforms that uses kh58. bcz i am not crazy like you to think a su24 or su22 is worth doing sead with at 13.0 GRB.

Su25SM3 has them. Also more importantly, does russia need them? Russia already gets a built in extremely good ESM that is basically a wallhack against SPAAs coupled with Kh38s
But of course, nah, russia requires not only the best SPAA but also the best ARM coupled with the best ATGM be it SAL or IR because we cant have russia losing 1% WR
What a tragedy.

maybe you should reread what I said

also stop playing dumb, theres a reason you cut it off at that range and even in your video at most it is 2 seconds slower not a world apart like you are trying to imply

kinematicaly they are similar at closer ranges with HARM having traveled up to ~1000m further at close range

however past ~15-20km depending on launch speed KH58 is significantly better

so as I said they are very comparable as much as you try to downplay it

and lets see how it compares with every other ARM, oh yeah it is right in the middle of the best ones and is the best at longer ranges

1 Like

idk take that to the dev.

cut off range ? as i said it to you, if you think you will be launching sead weapons at 40km in GRB. quit playing the mode.

oh well at least you understood what i said.