No…a higher skill ceiling means you must be better to get the most out of something. Therefore, it take more skill to make it shine.
Funny how absolutely amazing shots come from all angles after 10:00 et… Your post will get flagged when they get on.
Not really.
The T-series are also just hard capped in terms of how much you can get out of them with skill, while the Abrams has an almost unlimited potential.
Something stomping doesn’t stomp something. M1A1 > all russian tanks. End of discussion
Turret basket seems was buffed with HP. I never recall surviving this much and basket not breaking from direct shots
But do not never forget: american tanks are trash
congrats? you can cherry pick and are better than the average player? that doesnt mean anything
With that argument nothing you say either means anything then
“blah blah cherry picked, worse/better than avg player etc…”
Dude the whole argument is that the problem is that a average player in a Russian tank can do the same performance as a skilled veteran in a NATO tank this should not be the case if the game was not balanced of stats
Press X for doubt.
??? what did I say something wrong
What? Average player means well player is average. How exactly he gonna farm 3-4 k/d and 65-80 wr even in Russian(any) tank? Maybe you know some of these players and show us? Instead of just blabbering?
Upd: checked their stats. Some heavy projecting I see. And guess how many Russian tanks have they both played?
2 things:
-
Not true
-
We really should stop grouping all of NATO/NATO aligned together in such a sentence, since there are 2-3 pretty clearly defined tiers of MBTs within the NATO/NATO aligned nations.
aand that’s why I focus around the abrams/leopard 2 in these discussions
Well, this is interesting. With the introduction of the new shells in the tanks, they changed their default ammunition to a new standard, as far as it can see.
Average Russian match when nobody has a jet or helicopter
fun game driving around with -4 gun depression, -4kph reverse, the worst ammo in terms of dmg, muzzle velocity, reload, pen, 3 crew and front of turret roof weakspots where people can literally shoot down into your tank bypassing all armor at even 5km range. 2 crew = 30 second repair for simple fixes.
Srsly if ur team doesn’t spawn a mi-28 or su-30, it’s joever
still better than the Chally’s and the Leclerc’s
atleast you have armour (more than a 75 TON bunker tank which im sure russian mains fully believe is realistic)
Using L27A1 btw so one of the worst top tier rounds still

Oplot would like it’s rightful claim to that title.
eh thats 12.3 so i didnt mention it but yeah
Leclerc is almost 1800m/s , it is a laser with the exact same pen and 5s reload vs 6s or even 7s.
Britain has a 12.0 tank that is better than every Russian tank in the TD with the L/55 lmao. They now even get an M1A2 with Kew-A2. The regular chally round is dead equal with 3BM60 but with a 5s reload not 6s or 7s.
10 degrees of gun depression is equivalant to 1000mm of armor
Every single time you play a Russian tank you are accepting the fact you are going to take hits in the turret. Chally have 36kph reverse and -10. They don’t even need to get hit in the first place on most maps.
And than you have Leopard 2’s and Abrams which are Chally except with better everything anyway, no compromise on weight, shell, armor weak spots or anything.
if you think the Chally 3TD is better than “every russian tank” then you are wrong. DM53 on a 6s reload doesnt mean much when you have no armour no blowout panels a turret basket etc. also L27A1 is NOT dead equal because its gets a faster reload for 4 shots
10 degrees of gun depresiion doesnt make up for the slow speed bad armour bad ROF because the small ready rack even worse survivability than russian tanks the power electronics etc, the challengers after this update became practically useless


