best layout, meaning it’s all in the turret, with a blowout panel.
Unlike the T-series tinderbox and leopard 2 hull ammo storage.
You’re proving me right here.
The crew is safe, tank still alive.
Not having to skyline yourself to take a shot because there’s a slight incline and then being able to retreat easily and quickly is infinitely superior to a slightly lower profile and not being able to properly disengage thanks to reverse.
your main argument is “RNG”. Which you can’t really prove that well
A simple way to see which vehicle is better is to simply look at more competitive aspects of the game, such as squadron battles and TSS.
Which vehicles are meta?
That’s right, it’s NOT the T-series.
Let’s look at the meta list for the last br:
And now top tier:
If you watch the lineups that squadrons use at top tier you’ll notice there’s a larger amount of abrams players compared to any T-series.
Or even just leopard 2 vs any T-series.
Only time the T-series is used is when pantsir/Kamov/Mi-28 player has to go tank or they have no more abrams/leo players
I wonder why the abrams is used more often? Surely it’s not because it’s the superior vehicle.
It’s almost like it has significantly more things going for it compared to any T-series tank.
Hell, even the 12.0 clickbait is superior to a T-90M or even T-80BVM.
you were destroyed multiple times by multiple people using multiple arguments and you fail to notice you just repeat over and over the things that were denied by others using factual data…
Stop coping and defending the obvious favoritism towards one nation in this game. LAME
Which is actually realistic. Although they do not accept the leaked document for other reports this is indeed as stated on the document, BR should come down though, and some armour fix should be implemented.
You clearly don’t know what you’re talking about.
Basically Abrams supposed to win every peeking from hill contest because T series has vulnerable turret roof. Its known weakspot.
Everytime I see T series hiding behind small terrain I push them with no fear and win almost all of them
Can’t show it, still ‘classified’, but the transmission showed in the leaked Thai VT-4 document did have 17km/h reverse. I am surprised u are not aware of that, since the Thai VT-4 is one of the more major leaks from this forum. U can have a look yourself, should be somewhere. Or go and check out one of the relevant threads where the same conversation has already taken place many many times.
That’s a crap way to do it, you are comparing a coordinated team playing together to a group of Randoms. Competitive players are not holding W in a BMP-T or a T-80UE. T-90M2 will be the best tank in the game not because it is but because it can reverse and Gaijin love to glaze Russia.
Yet in Random games that tactic will win you the game.
We should share videos of the T-90M that I shot in the breach 4 times and never once killed a crew member yet he killed my crew in my Cr2 when he hit my breach. T-90s are famous for being so spacious, I shouldn’t be surprised that none of the spall hit any crew members…
Neither of those are going to completely disarm the tank like they would an Abrams though. Leopard has the hull rack and killing only autoloader on T-90 is basically nothing, he can still fight after short repair
You share yours I will share mine - what’s exactly you want to say and prove? Happens with every vehicles occasionally. Or you think I’m playing only against russian MBTs?
Man, I’m so tired of these obnoxious arguments covering this pampered nation. Especially the ones telling other people to aim better like you are some kinds of Lv10 FACEIT CS2 big times
If you are that good, you shouldn’t be worry how people want to fix the balance.
Instead, just went on cried again and again to stop the balance from being fixed.
Thing is, where does fixing balance stop and handholding bad players start.
For example the T-90M is already an average tank at best, but some people here (usually with questionable skill) make it out to be this really strong and dominant tank.