It’s all just so tiresome, isn’t it?
I’d like to confess that whenever I feel like playing top-tier NATO nowadays, I just ask one of my friends to queue as russia with me. I feel like a coward and the wait times are admittedly atrocious, however, the overall experience is much more enjoyable this way.
May god have mercy upon my sinful soul.
Holy deserved.
I played a session in Elsa Leopard and played Abrams a lot before, it feels awful
russian 'tarded teammates never capture the point though
It’s pretty comparable to the Chally 1.
But honestly the Booker is kind of criminal at 10.7, especially when it’s closes counterpart in the VT5 sits at 11.7 (probably more to do with that thing being overtiered).
The whole reason why VT-5 sits at 11.7 because of combination Autoloader,Spall liners and amazing mobility.
No doubt Booker is more or less on same level but if you ask me but should be 11.3 at best or they can give BT4A round to VT-5 to increase its firepower.
Oh I absolutely agree that the VT5 is better than the Booker overall. I just don’t think it’s a full 1.0 BR jump better.
Agreed, but given how Gaijin has treated some of the Chinese equipment/weaponry lately I don’t have much hope.
I was actually quite surprised when VT family recieved spall liners.
Then again they refused to fix VT4’s reverse speed , DTC-125 penetration and also refuse to add spall liners to WZ1001/ZTZ99A/MBT-2000 family.
Not gonna even talk about WZ’s reload rate which is also wrong.
I have personal bias towards Germany thinking Gaijin made personal setting for Germany more likely to team up with Russia so their winrate won’t fall to abysmal 30%.
Observation from 700 battles with abrams.
It still baffles me that there are some people on here (not you obviously) that look at all the examples you give alongside PL12/12A being gutted and somehow still believe that Gaijin is biased towards China as well.
I believe main reason is because of Taiwanese vehicles, they look at Mirag2000-5,M1A2T and AH-64E and think “yeah Gaijin is based towards China” while completely ignoring those facts.
Not gonna lie I was skeptical that China was receiving NATO vehicles but in time I got use to it.
China absolutely did need the Abrams tbf
Ironic that their best vehicle is american
Most irrevelant reply to our debate…
Nuh-uh
I understand you jump into conclusions before reading the entire debate but its not helpful.
i mean your just straight up wrong on this. Abrams reload is 6.5 seconds base and t-80s and t90s are 6… even if you were right though it wouldnt matter bc a .2 second faster reload isnt gonna save you when your round just gets eaten by volumetric and era hell. Super unconvincing argument bro… gotta work on it
???
The T-90s have a flat 7 second reload. And the T-80BVM has a 6.4 second reload if it wants to use 3BM60.
Something something pot something something kettle?
People not experting their crews is not a fault of the tank.
If you don’t expert your tank, that’s 100% on you.
it’s like taking DM33 over DM53 cause you don’t like how the number “53” looks
This spot is more deadly in the hands of a bmpt no?
