Ngl, this is some of the dumbest stuff i read here so far.
1 Like
You clearly don’t know what you’re talking about.
Basically Abrams supposed to win every peeking from hill contest because T series has vulnerable turret roof. Its known weakspot.
Everytime I see T series hiding behind small terrain I push them with no fear and win almost all of them
1 Like
Speaking with your vast experience using soviet tanks I assume
Can’t show it, still ‘classified’, but the transmission showed in the leaked Thai VT-4 document did have 17km/h reverse. I am surprised u are not aware of that, since the Thai VT-4 is one of the more major leaks from this forum. U can have a look yourself, should be somewhere. Or go and check out one of the relevant threads where the same conversation has already taken place many many times.
That’s a crap way to do it, you are comparing a coordinated team playing together to a group of Randoms. Competitive players are not holding W in a BMP-T or a T-80UE. T-90M2 will be the best tank in the game not because it is but because it can reverse and Gaijin love to glaze Russia.
Yet in Random games that tactic will win you the game.
We should share videos of the T-90M that I shot in the breach 4 times and never once killed a crew member yet he killed my crew in my Cr2 when he hit my breach. T-90s are famous for being so spacious, I shouldn’t be surprised that none of the spall hit any crew members…
Neither of those are going to completely disarm the tank like they would an Abrams though. Leopard has the hull rack and killing only autoloader on T-90 is basically nothing, he can still fight after short repair
You share yours I will share mine - what’s exactly you want to say and prove? Happens with every vehicles occasionally. Or you think I’m playing only against russian MBTs?
Man, I’m so tired of these obnoxious arguments covering this pampered nation. Especially the ones telling other people to aim better like you are some kinds of Lv10 FACEIT CS2 big times
If you are that good, you shouldn’t be worry how people want to fix the balance.
Instead, just went on cried again and again to stop the balance from being fixed.
Thing is, where does fixing balance stop and handholding bad players start.
For example the T-90M is already an average tank at best, but some people here (usually with questionable skill) make it out to be this really strong and dominant tank.
In many scenarios, reverse back to cover and not exposes to enemy fire a much
Yeah, totally not hand holding TT and premium anything.
Then you shouldn’t be worried buddy
Can’t retaliate? Just call things dumb.
Know it’s the truth but want to have at least some input? Just call things dumb.
What purpose was behind that fart into obscurity of yours?
So you admit that T-series can be pretty limited in when,where and how they can engage.
And that is exactly why I will always choose to play the Abrams over the top tier T-series. Playing the T-90M makes me so miserable.
I genuinely think you scoop soup with chopsticks.
Ahem. That ‘miserable experience’ somehow leads you to win more in the ‘worse T-90M’ than in the Abrams.
Truly - I don’t know how people cope with their sub-standard MBTs that they keep winning in…
Don’t try to “rusia main” my entire argument. That’s why I usually avoid engaging in any type of argument with you guys.
Has limitations and pretty limited are two completely different things. Every tank has limitations. Limitations on timings, positions, playstyles. Abrams has it, leopard has it, Trashcanks have it as well.
What about NATO hump? Limitation? Yes, leopards do suffer from it the most. Are they unplayable because of it? No, not at all.
The counter argument for NATO humps was something like “just turn the hull”. Yea? Why not do the same with any Trashcank then?
@_Renzo Here’s your basic problem. You are conflating your preferences with actual data.
You might find non Russian vehicles more fun to play, you might prefer the handling, the mobility, whatever. Yet the data shows that you aren’t doing ‘better’ in them. You are actually doing often ‘better’ in tanks you think are worse - despite your comments above. You are an above-average player.
Now we move on to the playerbase in general - the average. They are doing better in Russian vehicles than NATO ones at top tier.
The really bad players do really badly in everything they use - yet somehow they are less bad in Russian vehicles at top tier.
Summary -
Above average players are doing better using T-series tanks.
Average players are doing better using T-series tanks.
Below-average players are doing better using T-series tanks.
Do you see the COMMON theme in all of the above statements (all shown by the statistics)? I’ll give you a clue.
It’s those terrible sub-par MBTs that you keep telling us are miserable to play…
CAS factors in - but not in every single match. In GRB people have to start off using MBTs before they get to play in the aerial toys. You stand a better chance of getting those SP if your MBTs are solid choices for their tier (which I’d argue all of the Russian lineup is).
If you’re referring to Thai leaks then we’re talking about same thing.
I’m aware that, the thing is classified source also causing conflicting, some people say its translated wrong and thats why Gaijin modelled current transmission like how its in game.
Also dont you think its little weird that China suddenly decided make worse transmission for their export tanks compare to previous MBTXXXX projects?
There is no official source that indicates T-90M2 will have better reverse speed.
Only some claims and questionable video that was speed up.