Amazing.
Remind me why again that the least skilled IFV has the highest overall win rate again. And why is it RU.
Tell me again about all the vehicles that NATO players have that can just W to 57 to 60 percent win rates. Or is that only a certain IFV on the RU side?
not Russia’s fault that US players just can’t figure out how to shoot weakspots and use their superior tanks to their advantage
Right.
I’m sure its just NATO players and how stupid they are that they can’t hit that magical one shot spot on BMPT’s.
Or any of the other magical RU vehicles that avoid this same conumdrum.
I can’t imagine it has anything to do with magical armor, combat performance and modules that are continually applied - singularly - to the RU tree because Wargaming can’t get over its RU favoritism.
Considering LMUR is RU based I doubt it’s authenticity. Just like the KH-38MT.
Always about the perception of RU power rather than the reality of it - which is that they can’t deploy and execute missile systems as complex as this with this frequency.
Always another make believe russian wonderwaffe to add to the RU tree - while everyone else has ‘realism’.
You mean like make believe ATGM’s getting added?
or make believe IFV’s getting combat performance not reflected in RL?
In both cases it would be RU.
Not sure what that has to do with defeating them with smoke.
Whatever, other countries don’t have unlimited ressources of their “good stuff” either.
yes actually
Sooner or later, players will get tired of this, and that’s how it will be.
Gaijin, keep strengthening the Soviet nation.
This has never happened. The USSR always dominated, it just wasn’t as obvious before as it is now. In 2018-2019, the Soviets already had the 3BM42, T-64, T-80U, BMP-2M, Tunguska, and many other OPs. So what you’re showing is fake.
No lmao.
2017 US dominated ground hard for the whole year.
2018 Germany dominated most of the year with the 2A5 and the last couple of months the US joined them with the M1A2.
Ah yes, the BMP-2M so famously OP in 2018-2019 while it was only added in early 2020.
Meanwhile none of the T-64s have ever been OP during that time. Both the T-64A and 64B got roflstomped on their release.
So not only are you a mediocre player, you are also either lying on purpose or have selective memory.
I wasn’t playing Toptir back then, so I can’t know for sure. I was playing mid-ranks back then.
But I don’t remember seeing any videos of Abrams tanks dominating. There were even challenges to destroy as many Abrams tanks as possible with a BT5 tank. After all, the Abrams tanks weren’t armored. The Abrams’ only advantage was their speed. They weren’t as OP as the Terminator or T-90M are now. It doesn’t even compare.
But even if you believe your diagram, the US dominated for just over a year. Then the USSR took over, and continued to dominate for six years. A steep price to pay for one year of dominance, only to then spend six years humiliating the US and Germany and elevating the USSR. Let me remind you that the Pantsir, Su-39, and T-90M were introduced more than three years ago. And over the next three years, all these vehicles received nothing but buffs, while the Abrams and Leopards were heavily nerfed.
Then you haven’t really looked, or you just don’t want to see it since you are a US main with a victim complex.
The M1 slapped the absolute crap out of the T-64B/Leo 2K/Chally Mk.2 and it wasn’t even close.
Then about 6 months later they finally gave Russia a tank that was close to the M1 in the T-80B, only for Gaijin to add the even better IPM1 in the same update.
Alongside giving the US the best AA (M247) and best heli (AH-1Z) at the time.
And even with those buffs the T-90M has always been and is still just average and nothing special.
Meanwhile the 2A7s/122s and Abrams are still among the best tanks at top tier even with those nerfs.
The Abrams is nothing special. It has no armor, no shells capable of destroying Soviet MBTs in silhouette, and no proper visor. All it has is reverse and a gun depression/elevation system, which are useless on urban maps or open fields.
Did I understand you correctly, because the US dominated for 1 year, now this nation must be destroyed for 6 years?
It is always the same excuse.
Kh-38, LMURS, BMPT, pantsirs and the next broken thing they add is ok cuz rivers and deprechion bad.
It reminds me of “Children must pay for the sins of their fathers,” like in Westeros. I wasn’t playing top tier then, that was a long time ago. Why should I suffer now?
I remember there used to be a balance: the USSR got Tunguska, then they got ADATS, etc. It wasn’t like one nation got only OP for years.
No:
I’m just calling out your blatant lie that Russia has always dominated.
The US is fine. Their tanks are incredible and everything else is solid.
The current balance issues are only the BMPT, SM-SV, KH38MT and LMURs. Not US equipment being bad.
If you are seriously implying that the T-90M is better overall than the M1A2s than that is your skill issue speaking.
Do you think is normal?
