The Abrams is nothing special. It has no armor, no shells capable of destroying Soviet MBTs in silhouette, and no proper visor. All it has is reverse and a gun depression/elevation system, which are useless on urban maps or open fields.
Did I understand you correctly, because the US dominated for 1 year, now this nation must be destroyed for 6 years?
It is always the same excuse.
Kh-38, LMURS, BMPT, pantsirs and the next broken thing they add is ok cuz rivers and deprechion bad.
It reminds me of “Children must pay for the sins of their fathers,” like in Westeros. I wasn’t playing top tier then, that was a long time ago. Why should I suffer now?
I remember there used to be a balance: the USSR got Tunguska, then they got ADATS, etc. It wasn’t like one nation got only OP for years.
No:
I’m just calling out your blatant lie that Russia has always dominated.
The US is fine. Their tanks are incredible and everything else is solid.
The current balance issues are only the BMPT, SM-SV, KH38MT and LMURs. Not US equipment being bad.
If you are seriously implying that the T-90M is better overall than the M1A2s than that is your skill issue speaking.
Do you think is normal?
These winrates are for the overwhelming majority carried by the BMPT, SM-SV, KH38MT and LMUR.
The M1A2s performance besides winrate is still very much in line with the BVM/90M. The M1A2s just have a much higher skill ceiling meaning they are much better tanks for decent players.
Skill has nothing to do with it. Everyone who plays for the USA against the USSR loses. I sent you your own table above.
No dude, Vikhrs, HE damage, autoloader-basket joke, stock reload, damage model in general and free vehicles in a match are also a balance issue.
One side has for free an AA that is the 2nd-3rd best in the game (after sm-sv) the other one has adats, I can´t count how many times I was watching the plane/missile I want to shoot down and the adats radar just can´t get a propper lock, even understanding that an adats is better against tanks, it just make you doubt about the balance concerns of dev´s.
It just took 1 update of having Buk´s not performing well and japanese kh-38s to add a max 48 and mach 5 missiles AA, while israel still has to deal with the spyder that cant kill a UAV.
But at least you don’t deny that the USSR currently dominates everyone. Not everyone is willing to admit that.
It has actually on the ground. The T-90M that is shown in your video is just a perfect skill check tank.
Bad players usually struggle against it while decent players just farm it.
Yeah I never denied that. I’m just done with people overhyping the T-series MBTs and underselling the Abrams.
Hahahaha. This is very funny. I got your joke.
I get it, being decent at the game is hard to comprehend for struggling players.
I played for a long time on 11.7, and the Abrams was tolerable. It wasn’t great, it wasn’t bad, but as soon as I reached 13.0 and encountered the T-90M, which is impossible to destroy from the side, simply unkillable, and it happens in every battle, I simply deleted the game. I abandoned the KV-8 Event. It’s a good thing I didn’t buy a premium account.
I one shot kill them through the side 70-90% of the time with no problems, depending on my physical and mental state at the moment.
I have never ever considered the T-90M more of a problem than any other MBTs in battle. Hell a well played Leclerc/Merkava Mk.4/Type 10/Abrams is much scarier than a well played T-90M.
Holy skill issue.
It’s kinda debatable. People always say that the Abrams (or other nato tanks) can be more dangerous if they’re played well, but the fact is that… most tanks aren’t played well. I’m not a very good player, but I do better in the T-80BVM or T-90M than any Abrams simply because it’s easier to tank hits. Even when I do get penned in a Russian mbt, I often find myself surviving minus the autoloader (which itself is less of a problem considering you can still aim and return a shot).
Once you give that to a whole team (which consists of mostly not-great players), they absolutely do become an issue. That’s without even mentioning bmpts, Russian cas, and Russian spaa, which are their own whole issues.
0.1 0.05 Tank KD Gap at Russia bias defenders look it is Large gap . And selectively ignore BMPT(BMPT not Russia tank?) and Russia air > 1KD gap of NATO same kind
