Leopard 2A7s are good because they not just have good armour, but good mobility, gun traverse/depression as well as amazing firepower.
They also have the superior internal layout and ammunition storage which boosts survivability.
1 Like
The 2a7 is the best tank in game because it literally does everything better than almost every tank in the game.
You can just, not shoot the Relikt.
T-90s can’t side-scrape due to reverse gear, the reload means anyone can out reload you or push you freely after you fire.
CQC fights need fast reloads, T-90s don’t have that
2 Likes
Abrams firepower is actually superior to leopard 2.
2nd best round with much better reload.
Abrams has superior ammunition layout (no hull ammo)
Pretty sure Abrams also has superior mobility.
Abrams also gets HEATMP.
The armour just makes the 2A7 more forgiving
So you’re saying that despite the advantages of the abrams mobility and firepower that armor makes the leo a better tank?
No, it just makes the leopard more forgiving.
Not better.
They’re pretty much equal, although a highly skilled player will do better in an abrams than a leopard
1 Like
So what your saying is armor matter in a top tier tank.
I’m saying armour isn’t the priority.
Mobility + firepower are more important
It’s mediocre firepower and garbage mobility make the T-90M one of the worst brawlers at top tier.
I love facing them in a brawl, because they are mostly a free kill for me at that point.
But worse vehicle will limit player maximum output. No matter how good player is, they will always perform worse in ghibli than in tram or su25t.
unless its the leo where the armor makes it better than the abrams which has better firepower and mobility though right?
Idk I enjoy facing russian tanks in long range where my ariete has all its downsides removed and instead get to play on equal footing now.
No, I said it makes it more forgiving, not better.
Stop misunderstanding what I’m saying
In fact, I even indirectly said the Abrams is better.
This is like saying a pro soccer player will be limited in output during a football match lol.
The abrams isnt better than the leo lmao.
Armor matters only when combined with good/great mobility, good/great firepower or both. The 2A7s have great armor, great mobility and great firepower which makes it the best top tier tank.
The T-90M has great armor, mediocre firepower and bad mobility which just makes it nothing special.
It is equal to the leopard for a decent player, for a highly skilled player it is better.
Mediocre mobility of the T-90M means that I will always decide the conditions and locations of the brawl when fighting one in my M1A2.
The mediocre firepower of the T-90M means that I only need to bait out one shot for the T-90M to be dead in the water when fighting one in my Abrams.
This is what makes the T-90M a worse brawler than the M1A2s.
1 Like
T-80 is actually a better brawler than the T-90 thanks to reload and mobility.
But it is forced to use the worse round for the good reload and still suffers from bad mobility.
The armour can’t make up for those downsides either
1 Like
Seems like you didnt understand the example. Okay, Ill rephrase it to make it easier. Pro soccer player will perform worse if their legs are tied. And if they wear slippers instead of sneakers.