That is wromg due to t series being limited to their counterpart from nato. Good player on tank with better armament + better armor layout + actual reverse speed will be much more effective than good player or bvm. That is the reason pro players mainly pick leopards, abrams, leclercs, type10s.
Bvm has weak roof so sitting in hulldown will lead you to hangar. And its not hard to hit. Thats issue of many t series including this one.
By this logic t72a, t80ud and other stuff can be defined as best on their respective tiers. “I drive, I shoot, I shrug off some shot, I best” while losing to analogs in terms of mobility, gun handling, reload speed and other factors.
But it doesnt become more efficient than 2a7, 122b+. Because vehicle itself is limited compared to analogs. This is proven by both stats and tournaments. By average players and by experienced ones.
Does Russia has the best SACLOS SPAAs + best IFVs + best tank destroyer + best CAS at top tier yes or no ?
Of course yes, thus of course they dominate top tier thus of course there is a bias in this game. It’s that simple
Plus, t-series are the best MBTs along with Leos, every other MBTs are crap because lack of armor. So again, Russia has a semi bias in that category as well.
So unfair to other nations. What are we, a joke ? Food for Russia at best ?
Better mobility… than an 80bvm? Reverse speed sure, but I rarely realistically need more than what the 80BVM has when playing it. Forward mobility and steering counts for more in my view. This is getting subjective though.
Also you heavily overestimate the utility of APS. It’s nice but it doesn’t account for the challenger 2 base in reality.
I wouldn’t go calling the typhoon strong cas tbh. Not in comparison to kh38 carriers. Gripen is better because 16 spice 250s but it’s a matter of whether you value saturation vs mach jesus instant death stick.
