Your “source” is an incorrect analysis of a blatantly forwards tear pattern.
7 Likes
I’ll watch it and get back to you on that one, cheers.
1 Like
Ahahahaha, dude your head is designed to think, not to just eat. Stop believing everything you like or want to be true.
seeing absolutely everything that you posted here in the thread, and seeing that the dude above literally has shown you how you can nicely see the pattern on top of the fact that the 2A42 lacks any form of additional structural stabilizers or fasteners to prevent the recoil and is known to fly all over the place, i think its safe to say that the one who should start thinking and stop blindly believing everything he reads on the internet is you.
2 Likes
Inaccurate in what way? You mean the rating they made?
Yeah I don’t need to use that. I look at games played, winrate, kills, deaths and spawns. All of those are pretty accurate since statshark just pulls them from the game or API or whatever the name is.
I did after an image was provided.
Gone through the transcript and looked at anything that appeared to be of note, I still can’t find any mention of its accuracy. It appears to be another (again very valid) complaint about the site actively encouraging toxicity just by existing.
4 Likes
is known
Trust me bro
What are you even on about? If you don’t have anything of significance, just don’t reply.
if you cant look at a video evidence, a real life live fire video evidence of a cannon and willingly ignore VISIBLE wobble during extremely short bursts, you should simply just not be here.
Youre living in a imaginary world that doesnt follow basic principles of logic. Especially after multitude of people have told you otherwise you are pulling a petulent 5 year old act of stubbornness trying to disprove shit others have literally shown you.
The problem lies with you friendo, not with the people trying to explain to you something you actively choose to ignore.
Dont even bother replying, because unlike you I know that you wont have anything of significance to say.
6 Likes
I watched the above video and it doesn’t talk about the accuracy or reliability of statshark at all.
The whole video is about: 1) the live match viewer and it’s possibly negative effects on the community and 2) about the statshark dev that turned out to be a hacker and did some messed up stuff.
2 Likes
thats not what he said
1 Like
Looks close to what we have in the game.
1 Like
I’d be inclined to disagree.
I’d also say it’s telling that the PKT is actually more accurate.
Kh-38MT does exist it just does not function like it does in game. It is for all intents and purpose a GNS guided missile. The IR seeker is only during the terminal phase similar to a Stormshadow/Scalp missile
It would not have a gen 3 seeker and it would not be able to lock optically from 12-20km away like it does in game. Unfortunately the missile has been given the same properties as the AGM-65
2 Likes
As a matter of fact, I’d agree, at night and from a distance, it really does look like what we have in the game. Especially on a heavily compressed video from a cheap phone.
The heck i supposed to see here ? Can you pick timecode in video like normal person ?
It’s the only point where they fire the PKT…
There’s nothing to catch here. It’s literally an echochamber. Flagger_cbs here is going to tear up again and report your post for suggesting the other echochamber member to act like a normal person. It’s miserable.
Oh wow rifle caliber fixed machinegun is more accurate than automatic 30mm cannon if you have nothing to say than say nothing.